Cited by 186Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchMigration, Health and Trauma

Predictors of chronic post-traumatic stress disorder: A prospective study

Freedman, Sara A., Brandes, Dalia, Peri, Tuvia, Shalev, Arieh Y.·1999·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Most individuals who, shortly after trauma, express symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) recover within one year of their traumatic experiences. In contrast, those who remain ill for one year rarely recover completely. The early identification of the latter is, therefore, very important. Aims To prospectively evaluate predictors of PTSD at four months and one year. Method We followed 236 trauma survivors recruited from admissions to a general hospital's emergency room for four months, at which point 41 (17.4%) met diagnostic criteria for PTSD. Twenty-three of these individuals, and 39 individuals without PTSD at four months, were assessed again at one year. Results Depressive symptoms were the best predictors of PTSD at both time points. Intrusive symptoms and peri-traumatic dissociation were better at predicting four-month PTSD than one-year PTSD. Conclusions The occurrence of depression during the months that follow a traumatic event is an important mediator of chronicity in PTSD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.174.4.353

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prospective studies disagree about whether peritraumatic dissociation predicts later PTSD.

    “Indeed, some prospective studies suggest that peritraumatic dissociation predicts PTSD over time (e.g., Birmes et al., 2003; Ehlers, Mayou, & Bryant, 1998; Holen, 1991; Marmar et al., 1999; Murray, Ehlers, & Mayou, 2002; Schafer, Barkmann, Riedesser, & Schulte-Markwort, 2004; Shalev & Freedman, 2005; Ursano et al., 1999); however, others do not”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Freedman, S. A., Brandes, D., Peri, T., & Shalev, A. Y.
Affiliations
Hadassah Medical Center (IL)
Corresponding author
Shalev, Arieh Y.
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
1999-04
Volume
174
Issue
4
Pages
353-359
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2112581545
Cited by
186
References
3
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
13.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH-50379, R01MH050379)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
Keywords
chronic posttraumatic stress disorder, predictors of PTSD, depressive symptoms, intrusion symptoms, trauma survivors, emergency department patients
MeSH terms
Adult, False Positive Reactions, Female, Forecasting, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, ROC Curve, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review