Cited by 34Sexual Assault and Victimization StudiesMemory Processes and InfluencesPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Does trauma memory play a role in the experience of reporting sexual assault during police interviews? An exploratory study

Hardy, Amy, Young, Kerry, Holmes, Emily A.·2009·Memory

Abstract

A recent study indicated that 94.4% of reported sexual assault cases in the UK do not result in successful legal prosecution, also known as the rate of attrition (Kelly, Lovett, & Regan, 2005). Scant research has examined the role of trauma-related psychological processes in attrition. Victims of sexual assault (N =22) completed questions about peri-traumatic dissociation, trauma memory fragmentation, account incoherence during police interview, and likelihood of proceeding with legal cases. Higher levels of dissociation during sexual assault were associated with participants reporting more fragmented trauma memories. Memory fragmentation was associated with participants indicating that they provided more incoherent accounts of trauma during police interview. Importantly, people who viewed themselves as providing more incoherent accounts predicted that they would be less likely to proceed with their legal cases. The findings suggest trauma impacts on memory, and these trauma-related disruptions to memory may paradoxically contribute to attrition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09658210903081835

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hardy et al. found that peritraumatic dissociation on the PDEQ was moderately to strongly positively related to two single-item meta-memory fragmentation measures.

    “Self reports of peritraumatic dissociation, assessed using the Peritraumatic Dissociative Experiences Questionnaire (PDEQ; Marmar et al., 1997), were moderately to highly positively associated with two single items of meta-memory fragmentation, assessing “fragmented pieces” and “account incoherence”.”
  • Across Criterion A trauma samples, higher peritraumatic dissociation consistently accompanied higher self-rated fragmentation.

    “Taken together results of Halligan et al. (2003), Murray et al. (2002), and Hardy et al. (2009) generally suggest that, in Criterion A trauma-exposed samples, individuals with higher peritraumatic dissociation consistently show higher meta-memory ratings of fragmentation.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hardy, A., Young, K., & Holmes, E. A.
Affiliations
  • Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Hardy, Amy
Venue
Memory
Published
2009-11
Volume
17
Issue
8
Pages
783-788
ISSN
  • 0965-8211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0686
OpenAlex
W2120880692
Cited by
34
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
sexual assault, traumatic memory, memory fragmentation, police interviews, victim testimony, sexual assault survivors
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Memory, Surveys and Questionnaires, Repression, Psychology, Sex Offenses, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Police, Crime Victims

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review