Cited by 30Race, Genetics, and SocietyCognitive Abilities and Testingmelanin and skin pigmentation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Skin Color and Intelligence in African Americans

Lynn, Richard·2002·Population and Environment

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1014572602343

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Skin color was related to cognitive ability in models not including ancestry, as found in previous studies.

    “However, it was related to cognitive ability in models not including ancestry, as found in previous studies [17,[94][95][96] (for a review of older studies, see [1]).”

    From Global Ancestry and Cognitive Ability (2019) · cites this paper as [94]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Bean, R. B. (1906). Some racial peculiarities of the Negro brain. American Journal of Anatomy, 5, 353–432. · DOI
  2. Brody, N. (1992). Intelligence. San Diego: Academic.
  3. Davis, J. A., & Smith, T. W. (1996). General Social Surveys; Cumulative Codebook. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.
  4. Flynn, J. R. (1980). Race, IQ and Jensen. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  5. Flynn, J. R. (1991). Asian Americans: Achievement Beyond IQ. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  6. Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The Bell Curve. New York: Free Press.
  7. Herskovits, M. J. (1926). On the relation between Negro-white mixture and standing in intelligence tests. Pedological Seminary, 33, 30–42.
  8. Hill, M. E. (2000). Color differences in the socio-economic status of African American men: Results of a longitudinal study. Social Forces, 78, 1473–1460.
  9. Howe, M. J. (1997). IQ in Question. London: Sage.
  10. Jensen, A. R. (1973). Educability and Group Differences. London: Methuen.
  11. Jensen, A. R. (1981). Obstacles, problems and pitfalls in differential psychology. In S. Scarr (Ed), Race, Social Class and Individual Differences in IQ. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  12. Jensen, A. R., & Reynolds, C. R. (1982). Race, Social Class and ability patterns on the WISCR. Personality and Individual Differences, 3, 423–438. · DOI
  13. Klineberg, O. (1928). An experimental study of speed and other factors in racial differences. Archives of Psychology, 15, No. 93.
  14. Krieger, N., Sidney, S., & Coakley, E. (1998). Racial discrimination and skin color in the CARDIA study: Implications for public health research. American Journal of Public Health, 88, 1308–1313. · DOI
  15. Lynn, R. (1996). Racial and ethnic differences in intelligence in the United States on the Differential Ability Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 271–273. · DOI
  16. Lynn, R. (1997).Geographical Variation in Intelligence, in H. Nyborg (Ed.), The Scientific Study of Human Nature, Oxford: Pergamon.
  17. MacDonald, K. (1994). A People that Shall Dwell Alone: Judaism as a Group Evolutionary Strategy. Westport, CT: Praeger.
  18. Mackintosh, N. J. (1998). IQ and Human Intelligence. Oxford,UK: University Press.
  19. Nisbett, R. E. (1998). Race, genetics and IQ. In C. Jencks & M. Phillips (Eds.), The Black-White Test Score Gap. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
  20. Pearl, R. (1934). The weight of the Negro brain. Science, 80, 431–434. · DOI
  21. Rushton, J. P. (2000). Race, Evolution and Behavior. Port Huron, MI: Charles Darwin Research Institute.
  22. Scarr, S. (1981). Comments and replies. In S. Scarr Race, Social Class, and Individual Differences in IQ. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  23. Scarr, S. (1995). Inheritance, intelligence and achievement. Planning for Higher Education, 23, 1–9.
  24. Shockley, W. (1971). Hardy-Weinberg law generalized to estimate hybrid variance for Negro populations and reduce racial aspects of the environment-heredity uncertainty. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 68, 1390.
  25. Shuey, A. (1966). The Testing of Negro Intelligence. New York: Social Science Press.
  26. Vint, F. W. (1934).The brain of the Kenyan native. Journal of Anatomy, 48, 216–223.
  27. Witty, P. A., & Jenkins, M. D. (1936). Intra-race testing and Negro intelligence. Journal of Psychology, 1, 179–192.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lynn, R.
Affiliations
University of Ulster (GB)
Corresponding author
Lynn, Richard
Venue
Population and Environment
Published
2002-03
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
365-375
ISSN
  • 0199-0039 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7810
OpenAlex
W2142056854
Cited by
30
References
0
Citations by year
2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Population and Environment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Race, Genetics, and Society
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
Keywords
skin color, intelligence, African Americans, racial mixing, genetic ancestry, racial differences in intelligence, skin pigmentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review