Cited by 118Cognitive Abilities and TestingChild Welfare and AdoptionRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

The Minnesota transracial adoption study: A follow-up of IQ test performance at adolescence

Weinberg, Richard A., Scarr, Sandra, Waldman, Irwin D.·1992·Intelligence

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0160-2896(92)90028-p

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weinberg, R. A., Scarr, S., & Waldman, I. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Weinberg, Richard A.
Venue
Intelligence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-01
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
117-135
ISSN
0160-2896 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085387995
Cited by
118
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
7.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Intelligence (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
transracial adoption, academic performance, adolescence, adoptive families, racial identity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review