Cited by 140Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionImpact of Technology on AdolescentsHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

From normative influence to social pressure: How relevant others affect whether bystanders join in cyberbullying

Open access
Bastiaensens, Sara, Pabian, Sara, Vandebosch, Heidi, Poels, Karolien, Van Cleemput, Katrien, DeSmet, Ann, De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse·2016·Social Development

Abstract

Abstract As cyberbullying is a phenomenon that is inherently social, the normative social influence of significant others can play an important role in the behaviour of adolescents involved in cyberbullying incidents. Using data from 525 adolescent bystanders of cyberbullying, we created a path model in order to investigate whether injunctive and descriptive norms of certain reference groups can cause bystanders to experience social pressure and join in cyberbullying. The results showed that social pressure fully mediated the relationship between the injunctive norm of friends approving of cyberbullying and joining in cyberbullying as a bystander. Furthermore, both the injunctive norm of parents approving of cyberbullying and bystanders’ involvement in cyberbullying perpetration were related to joining in cyberbullying as a bystander.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/sode.12134

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bastiaensens, S., Pabian, S., Vandebosch, H., Poels, K., Van Cleemput, K., DeSmet, A., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I.
Affiliations
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
  • University of Antwerp
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • Ghent University
Corresponding author
Bastiaensens, Sara
Venue
Social Development
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-06
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
193-211
ISSN
  • 0961-205X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9507
OpenAlex
W1484409664
Cited by
140
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
15.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Development (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • BOF-NOI internal grant of the University of Antwerp (Belgium)
  • Friendly ATTAC (Adaptive Technological Tools Against Cyberbullying) SBO-project
  • IWT Flanders (Belgium)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
cyberbullying, normative influence, injunctive norms, descriptive norms, social pressure, adolescents, peer approval, parental approval, cyberbullying perpetration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review