Cited by 6,636Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningMachine Learning and AlgorithmsReinforcement Learning in Robotics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multitask Learning

Open access
Caruana, Rich·1997·Machine Learning

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1007379606734

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 67 references

3 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Caruana, R. (1994).”Multitask Connectionist Learning,” Proceedings of the 1993 Connectionist Models Summer School, pp. 372-379.
  2. Caruana, R. (1997). “Multitask Learning,” Ph.D. Thesis, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University.
  3. de Sa, V. R. (1994). “Learning Classification with Unlabelled Data,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 6, (Proceedings of NIPS-93), pp. 112-119.
  4. Liu, H. & Setiono, R. (1996). “A Probibilistic Approach to Feature Selection—A Filter Solution,” Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Machine Learning,ICML-96, Bari, Italy, pp. 319-327.
  5. Martin, J. D. (1994). “Goal-directed Clustering,” Proceedings of the 1994 AAAI Spring Symposium on Goal-directed Learning.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 1,024

Metadata

Authors
Caruana, R.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Corresponding author
Caruana, Rich
Venue
Machine Learning
Published
1997-07
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
41-75
ISSN
  • 0885-6125 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0565
OpenAlex
W2913340405
Cited by
6,636
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 532 · 2025: 617 · 2024: 510 · 2023: 505 · 2022: 565 · 2021: 803 · 2020: 767 · 2019: 563 · 2018: 323 · 2017: 259 · 2016: 188 · 2015: 151 · 2014: 124 · 2013: 89 · 2012: 136
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Machine Learning (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (9315428)
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Advanced Research Projects Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
Keywords
multi-task learning, inductive transfer, inductive bias, shared representations, task relatedness, k-nearest neighbors, kernel regression, case-based learning, decision tree

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review