Cited by 104Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationAdvanced Neural Network Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Generic Quality Control Framework for Fetal Ultrasound Cardiac Four-Chamber Planes

Dong, Jinbao, Liu, Shengfeng, Liao, Yimei, Wen, Huaxuan, Lei, Baiying, Li, Shengli, Wang, Tianfu·2020·IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics

Abstract

Quality control/assessment of ultrasound (US) images is an essential step in clinical diagnosis. This process is usually done manually, suffering from some drawbacks, such as dependence on operator's experience and extensive labors, as well as high inter- and intra-observer variation. Automatic quality assessment of US images is therefore highly desirable. Fetal US cardiac four-chamber plane (CFP) is one of the most commonly used cardiac views, which was used in the diagnosis of heart anomalies in the early 1980s. In this paper, we propose a generic deep learning framework for automatic quality control of fetal US CFPs. The proposed framework consists of three networks: (1) a basic CNN (B-CNN), roughly classifying four-chamber views from the raw data; (2) a deeper CNN (D-CNN), determining the gain and zoom of the target images in a multi-task learning manner; and (3) the aggregated residual visual block net (ARVBNet), detecting the key anatomical structures on a plane. Based on the output of the three networks, overall quantitative score of each CFP is obtained, so as to achieve fully automatic quality control. Experiments on a fetal US dataset demonstrated our proposed method achieved a highest mean average precision (mAP) of 93.52% at a fast speed of 101 frames per second (FPS). In order to demonstrate the adaptability and generalization capacity, the proposed detection network (i.e., ARVBNet) has also been validated on the PASCAL VOC dataset, obtaining a highest mAP of 81.2% when input size is approximately 300 × 300.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jbhi.2019.2948316

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Branch, 2012, Guidelines for prenatal ultrasound examination, Chin. J. Med. Ultrasound (Electron. Ed.), 9, 574
  2. 10.5555/3298023.3298188 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dong, J., Liu, S., Liao, Y., Wen, H., Lei, B., Li, S., & Wang, T.
Affiliations
  • Shenzhen University (CN)
  • Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital (CN)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Published
2020-04
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
931-942
ISSN
  • 2168-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-2208
OpenAlex
W2980762210
Cited by
104
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81571758, 81771922, 61871274, 61801305, 61501305)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China Stem Cell and Translational Research (2016YFC0104700)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
prenatal ultrasound, image quality control, automated quality assessment, deep learning, multi-task learning, convolutional neural networks, object detection
MeSH terms
Female, Fetal Heart, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Pregnancy, Quality Control, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review