CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 648Probiotics and Fermented FoodsBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyHeat shock proteins research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 294 of the 294 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stress responses in lactic acid bacteria

van de Guchte, Maarten, Serror, Pascale, Chervaux, Christian, Smokvina, Tamara, Ehrlich, Stanislav D., Maguin, Emmanuelle·2002·Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
DOI 10.1023/a:1020631532202
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) constitute a heterogeneous group of bacteria that are traditionally used to produce fermented foods. The industrialization of food bio-transformations increased the economical importance of LAB, as they play a crucial role in the development of the organoleptique and hygienic quality of fermented products. Therefore, the reliability of starter strains in terms of quality and functional properties (important for the development of aroma and texture), but also in terms of growth performance and robustness has become essential. These strains should resist to adverse conditions encountered in industrial processes, for example during starter handling and storage (freeze-drying, freezing or spray-drying). The development of new applications such as life vaccines and probiotic foods reinforces the need for robust LAB since they may have to survive in the digestive tract, resist the intestinal flora, maybe colonize the digestive or uro-genital mucosa and express specific functions under conditions that are unfavorable to growth (for example, during stationary phase or storage). Also in nature, the ability to quickly respond to stress is essential for survival and it is now well established that LAB, like other bacteria, evolved defense mechanisms against stress that allow them to withstand harsh conditions and sudden environmental changes. While genes implicated in stress responses are numerous, in LAB the levels of characterization of their actual role and regulation differ widely between species. The functional conservation of several stress proteins (for example, HS proteins, Csp, etc) and of some of their regulators (for example, HrcA, CtsR) renders even more striking the differences that exist between LAB and the classical model micro-organisms. Among the differences observed between LAB species and B. subtilis, one of the most striking is the absence of a sigma B orthologue in L. lactis ssp. lactis as well as in at least two streptococci and probably E. faecalis. The overview of LAB stress responses also reveals common aspects of stress responses. As in other bacteria, adaptive responses appear to be a usual mode of stress protection in LAB. However, the cross-protection to other stress often induced by the expression of a given adaptive response, appears to vary between species. This observation suggests that the molecular bases of adaptive responses are, at least in part, species (or even subspecies) specific. A better understanding of the mechanisms of stress resistance should allow to understand the bases of the adaptive responses and cross protection, and to rationalize their exploitation to prepare LAB to industrial processes. Moreover, the identification of crucial stress related genes will reveal targets i) for specific manipulation (to promote or limit growth), ii) to develop tools to screen for tolerant or sensitive strains and iii) to evaluate the fitness and level of adaptation of a culture. In this context, future genome and transcriptome analyses will undoubtedly complement the proteome and genetic information available today, and shed a new light on the perception of, and the response to, stress by lactic acid bacteria.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1020631532202

Cites

294 of 294 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Items 201–294 of 294

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Bouvier J, Bordes P, Romeo Y, Fourcans A, Bouvier I& Gutierrez C (2000) Characterization of OpuA, a glycine-betaine uptake system of Lactococcus lactis. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2: 199–205.
  2. Cashel M, Gentry D, Hernandez V J& Vinella D (1996) The stringent response. In: Neidhardt F C, Ingraham J L, Low K B, Magasanik B, Schaechter M& Umberger H E (eds.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: Cellular and Molecular Biology (pp 1458–1496). American Society for Microbiology Press, Washington, DC.
  3. Delmas F, Pierre F, Coucheney F, Divies C& Guzzo J (2001) Biochemical and physiological studies of the small heat shock protein Lo18 from the lactic acid bacterium Oenococcus oeni. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 3: 601–610.
  4. Drici-Cachon Z, Guzzo J, Cavin J-F& Diviès C (1996) Acid tolerance in Leuconostoc oenos. Isolation and characterization of an acid-resistant mutant. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 44: 785–789.
  5. Koonin E V, Aravind L& Glaperin M Y (2000) A comparativegenomic view of the microbial stress response. In: Stortz G& Hengge-Aronis R (Eds.) Bacterial Stress Responses (pp 417–444). ASM Press, Washington, DC.
  6. Laport M S, de Castro A C, Villardo A, Lemos J A, Bastos M C& Giambiagi-deMarval M (2001) Expression of the major heat shock proteins DnaK and GroEL in Streptococcus pyogenes: a comparison to Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus. Curr. Microbiol. 42: 264–268.
  7. Mercenier A, Muller-Alouf H& Grangette C (2000) Lactic acid bacteria as live vaccines. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2: 17–25.
  8. Phadtare S, Yamanata K& Inouye M (2000) The cold-shock response. In: Stortz G& Hengge-Aronis R (Eds.) Bacterial Stress Response (pp 33–45). ASM Press, Washington, DC.
  9. Stortz G& Hengge-Aronis R (Eds.) (2000) Bacterial Stress Responses (p 485). ASM Press, Washington, DC.
  10. Suzuki T, Unemoto T& Kobayashi H (1988) Novel streptococcal mutants defective in the regulation of H+-ATPase biosynhesis and in F0 complex. J. Biochem. Chem. 263: 11840–11843
  11. Yura T, Kanemori M& Morita T M (2000) The heat shock response: regulation and function. In: Storz G& Hengge-Aronis R (Eeds.) Bacterial Stress Responses (pp 3–18). ASM Press, Washington, DC.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 648

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
van de Guchte, M., Serror, P., Chervaux, C., Smokvina, T., Ehrlich, S. D., & Maguin, E.
Affiliations
  • Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (FR)
  • Danone (France) (FR)
Corresponding author
Maguin, Emmanuelle
ORCID
Venue
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2002-08
Volume
82
Issue
1-4
Pages
187-216
ISSN
  • 0003-6072 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9699
DOI
10.1023/a:1020631532202
OpenAlex
W4296587746
Cited by
648
References
294
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 32
FWCI
25.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Antonie van Leeuwenhoek (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heat shock proteins research
Keywords
lactic acid bacteria, stress response, stress tolerance, adaptive response, cross-protection, heat shock proteins, molecular chaperones, HrcA, CtsR, sigma B, Bacillus subtilis comparison, Lactococcus lactis, Enterococcus faecalis, probiotics, starter cultures, freeze-drying, stress response regulation, stress response genes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review