Cited by 106Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsSleep and related disorders

Influence of Shock Training and Explicit Fear-Conditioned Cues on Sleep Architecture in Mice: Strain Comparison

Sanford, Larry D., Tang, Xiangdong, Ross, Richard J., Morrison, Adrian R.·2003·Behavior Genetics

Abstract

Fear conditioning is thought to model anticipatory anxiety. Inbred mouse strains exhibit different levels of reactivity to aversive environmental stimuli, which may reflect anxiety. We examined the effects of fear conditioning on sleep in mouse strains that differ on behavioral measures of anxiety. Mice (BALB/cJ [C], C57BL/6J [B6], CB6F1/J [CB6], n = 7-10 per strain) were implanted with transmitters for recording sleep by telemetry. Baseline sleep was recorded, and the mice were trained to associate a cue (tone) with footshock (15 cue-shock pairings on 4 consecutive days). Sleep was recorded after shock training and again 4 to 5 days later after presentation of the cue alone. Shock training produced a relatively selective suppression of rapid eye movement sleep (REM) that was greater in the C strain compared to the B6 and CB6 mice. Post-training exposure to the cue alone suppressed REM in all strains. The C strain exhibited a relatively greater immediate suppression of REM, and the CB6 hybrid mice showed the greatest overall suppression of REM. These data demonstrate that stimuli associated with an aversive event can alter sleep and suppress REM in much the same way as exposure to the event itself. Fear conditioning may provide a model for examining genetic and neural mechanisms underlying the influence of anxiety on sleep.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1021051516829

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clonidine during SWS-rich retention impaired specifically emotional memory processing.

    “In a subsequent study, clonidine infused during a SWS-rich period of retention sleep appeared to impair specifically emotional memory processing (1031).”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [1031]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sanford, L. D., Tang, X., Ross, R. J., & Morrison, A. R.
Affiliations
  • Eastern Virginia Medical School (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Sanford, Larry D.
Venue
Behavior Genetics
Published
2003-01
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
43-58
ISSN
  • 0001-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3297
OpenAlex
W139460844
Cited by
106
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavior Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ns036694-04)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH061716, MH64827, MH 61716, R01MH064827)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS36694)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
fear conditioning, sleep architecture, REM sleep suppression, anticipatory anxiety, inbred mouse strains, BALB/cJ, C57BL/6J mice, hybrid mice, aversive stimuli, footshock
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Conditioning, Psychological, Cues, Electroshock, Fear, Genetics, Behavioral, Hybridization, Genetic, Male, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Sleep, Sleep, REM, Reflex, Startle, Telemetry, Time Factors, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review