The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Political scientists have found that partisan bias effects on questionanswering accuracy [Bartels, 2002] are significantly reduced when respondents are offered a monetary bonus for correct answers [Bullock et al., 2015, Prior et al., 2015].”
From Talk Isn't Always Cheap: Understanding Failure Modes in Multi-Agent Debate (2025) · cites this paper as Bartels, 2002
In the citing paper
“A seminal finding in political behavior research is that people tend to believe that economic outcomes (e.g., GDP growth, unemployment rate) are more favorable when their party is in the White House and more unfavorable when it is out (Bartels 2002).”
From The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States (2019) · cites this paper as Bartels 2002
In the citing paper
“A number of studies find that partisans disagree about politically-relevant facts on topics ranging from the performance of the economy (e.g., Bartels, 2002;Scha↵ner and Roche, 2017;Bisgaard and Slothuus, 2018) to the details of health care policy (e.g., Berinsky, 2017;Nyhan, 2010).”
From Partisan Gaps in Political Information and Information-Seeking Behavior: Motivated Reasoning or Cheerleading? (2019) · cites this paper as Bartels, 2002
Citations
Cites
An Economic Theory of Democracy.
Banfield, E. C., & Downs, A. J. (1958) · Midwest Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2109186 · Cited by 18,558
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
Zaller, J. R. (1992) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818691 · Cited by 7,785
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion.
Kenski, H. C., & Zaller, J. R. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2074664 · Cited by 5,150
Eulau, H. H. F. (1960) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1952653 · Cited by 4,744
Katz, R. S. (1982) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1961197 · Cited by 2,471
Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-5486 · Cited by 1,800
A Simple Theory of the Survey Response: Answering Questions versus Revealing Preferences
Zaller, J. R., & Feldman, S. (1992) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2111583 · Cited by 1,624
Voting, a Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign
Roshwalb, I., Berelson, B., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & McPhee, W. N. (1955) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1247297 · Cited by 1,591
Specification Searches: Ad Hoc Inference with Non-Experimental Data.
Richard, J.-F., & Leamer, E. E. (1981) · Economica · doi:10.2307/2553491 · Cited by 1,127
The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates
Rahn, W. M. (1993) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2111381 · Cited by 900
Flagged first, then by citations
4 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E. (1960). The American Voter. New York: John Wiley &Sons.
- Fiorina, Morris P. (1981). Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Leamer, Edward E. (1978). Specification Searches: Ad Hoc Inference with Nonexperimental Data. New York: John Wiley &Sons.
- Wattenberg, Martin P. (1996). The Decline of American Political Parties, 1952-1994. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,002
Mobility Optimism in an Age of Rising Inequality
Manza, J., & Brooks, C. (2020) · Sociological Quarterly · doi:10.1080/00380253.2020.1756520 · Cited by 25
Voter Decision-Making with Polarized Choices
Rogowski, J. C. (2016) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123415000630 · Cited by 26
Bernardi, L., & Adams, J. (2017) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123417000199 · Cited by 23
Anson, I. G., & Hellwig, T. T. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0090 · Cited by 25
Who Said or What Said? Estimating Ideological Bias in Views Among EconomistsPreprint
Javdani, M., & Chang, H. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3356309 · Cited by 23
Party politics and electoral behaviour
Saalfeld, T., & Schoen, H. (2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315747040.ch7 · Cited by 22
Polarization and the Decline of Economic Voting in American National Elections
Ellis, C., & Ura, J. D. (2020) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/ssqu.12881 · Cited by 24
Montgomery, M. D., Rogol, N. C., & Kingsland, J. T. (2019) · Presidential Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/psq.12596 · Cited by 22
Trumped by Trump? Public Support for Mail Voting in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic
Clinton, J. D., Lapinski, J. S., Lentz, S., & Pettigrew, S. (2021) · Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy · doi:10.1089/elj.2020.0671 · Cited by 22
Motivated reasoning, fast and slow
Strömbäck, C., Andersson, D., Västfjäll, D., & Tinghög, G. (2021) · Behavioural Public Policy · doi:10.1017/bpp.2021.34 · Cited by 23
Nawara, S. P. (2015) · Presidential Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/psq.12173 · Cited by 22
The role of authenticity in electoral social media campaigns
Grow, G., & Ward, J. (2013) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v18i4.4269 · Cited by 22
Polarized partisanship, over-stability and partisan bias in turkey
Çakır, S. (2019) · Turkish Studies · doi:10.1080/14683849.2019.1678030 · Cited by 22
Experts, Activists, and Interdependent Citizens: Are Electorates Self-Educating?
Ahn, T. K., Huckfeldt, R., & Ryan, J. B. (2014) · Cited by 22
European by action: How voting reshapes nested identities
Sczepanski, R. (2023) · European Union Politics · doi:10.1177/14651165231175533 · Cited by 23
Baranowski, M., Huber, R. A., Jabkowski, P., & Szulecka, J. (2024) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2024.2401257 · Cited by 22
Who Cares? Explaining Perceptions of Compassion in Candidates for Office
McDonald, J. A. (2020) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-020-09592-8 · Cited by 22
Party hacks and true believers: The effect of party affiliation on political preferences
Gould, E. D., & Klor, E. F. (2019) · Journal of Comparative Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jce.2019.03.004 · Cited by 21
Elections, competition, and constituent evaluations of U.S. senators
Sievert, J., & Williamson, R. D. (2021) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102424 · Cited by 21
Who said or what said? Estimating ideological bias in views among economists
Javdani, M., & Chang, H. (2023) · Cambridge Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/cje/beac071 · Cited by 21
Lying for Trump? Elite Cue-Taking and Expressive Responding on Vote Method
Shino, E., Smith, D. A., & Uribe, L. (2022) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfac045 · Cited by 21
Predicting Political Biases Against the O ccupy W all S treet and T ea P arty Movements
Crawford, J. T., & Xhambazi, E. (2013) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12054 · Cited by 21
Implicit Candidate‐Trait Associations in Political Campaigns
Ksiazkiewicz, A., Vitriol, J. A., & Farhart, C. E. (2017) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12398 · Cited by 24
Looking left or looking right? Effects of newspaper layout style on the perception of political news
Schindler, J., Krämer, B., & Müller, P. (2017) · European Journal of Communication · doi:10.1177/0267323117718463 · Cited by 21
Does voter polarisation induce party extremism? The moderating role of abstention
Dreyer, P., & Bauer, J. (2019) · West European Politics · doi:10.1080/01402382.2019.1566852 · Cited by 21
Brader, T. A., Sio, L. D., Paparo, A., & Tucker, J. A. (2020) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12651 · Cited by 26
An extraordinary election? A longitudinal perspective of the Québec 2018 election
Daoust, J., & Jabbour, A. (2020) · French Politics · doi:10.1057/s41253-020-00120-y · Cited by 21
Presidential Appeals to Moral Foundations: How Modern Presidents Persuade Cross‐Ideologues
Miles, M. R. (2016) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/psj.12151 · Cited by 21
Social Learning with Model Misspecification: A Framework and a CharacterizationPreprint
Bohren, J. A., & Hauser, D. N. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3236842 · Cited by 21
Heubeck, T., & Ahrens, A. (2025) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.4212 · Cited by 20
Magalhães, P. C. (2021) · Scientific Repository of Open Access of Portugal (RCAAP) · doi:10.31447/as00032573.2017225.01 · Cited by 20
Ideological and Partisan Bias in the Canadian Public
Merkley, E. (2021) · Canadian Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0008423921000147 · Cited by 23
Raymond, C. D., & Overby, L. M. (2014) · Party Politics · doi:10.1177/1354068814549346 · Cited by 20
Effects of physical attractiveness on political beliefs
Peterson, R. D., & Palmer, C. L. (2017) · Politics and the Life Sciences · doi:10.1017/pls.2017.18 · Cited by 20
Framing hate: Moral foundations, party cues, and (in)tolerance of offensive speech
Armstrong, G. M., & Wronski, J. (2019) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.v7i2.1006 · Cited by 24
Jungherr, A. M., Wuttke, A., Mader, M., & Schoen, H. (2021) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqab005 · Cited by 20
Eberhardt, L., & Merolla, J. L. (2016) · Journal of Women Politics & Policy · doi:10.1080/1554477x.2016.1198652 · Cited by 19
Unreflective Partisans? Policy Information and Evaluation in the Development of Partisanship
Brader, T. A., & Tucker, J. A. (2018) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12480 · Cited by 22
Economic crisis and support for progressive taxation in Europe
Garcia-Muniesa, J. (2018) · European Societies · doi:10.1080/14616696.2018.1547836 · Cited by 19
Voting and the rise of populism: Spatial perspectives and applications across Europe
Leeuwen, E. S. V., & Vega, S. H. (2021) · Regional Science Policy & Practice · doi:10.1111/rsp3.12411 · Cited by 19
Cognitive Political Economy: A Growing Partisan Divide in Economic Perceptions
Brady, D., Ferejohn, J., & Parker, B. (2021) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x211032107 · Cited by 19
Partisan attachments in a multidimensional space
Dassonneville, R. C., Fournier, P., & Somer‐Topcu, Z. (2022) · West European Politics · doi:10.1080/01402382.2022.2087387 · Cited by 17
Hoang, T., Ngo, P. T. H., & Zhang, L. (2024) · Journal of Corporate Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2024.102697 · Cited by 21
The President's Effect on Partisan Attitudes
Jacobson, G. C. (2012) · Presidential Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1741-5705.2012.04013.x · Cited by 20
Kim, H. A., & LeVeck, B. L. (2013) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055413000245 · Cited by 19
Economic Perceptions, Presidential Approval, and Causality
Dickerson, B. T. (2015) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x15600787 · Cited by 20
Ulbig, S. G. (2010) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/0891988709358950 · Cited by 19
Barabas, J. (2008) · Presidential Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1741-5705.2008.02636.x · Cited by 19
Fair and Balanced? Experimental Evidence on Partisan Bias in Grading
Musgrave, P., & Rom, M. C. (2014) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x14561655 · Cited by 18
Public Perceptions of State Court Impartiality and Court Legitimacy in an Era of Partisan Politics
Barwick, C. M., & Dawkins, R. (2019) · State Politics & Policy Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1532440019883979 · Cited by 19
Sources of Government Approval During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Threat or Electoral Predispositions?
Pignataro, A. (2021) · Journal of Politics in Latin America · doi:10.1177/1866802x211059184 · Cited by 20
Collins, J. (2022) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x221135521 · Cited by 18
Updating amidst Disagreement: New Experimental Evidence on Partisan Cues
Fowler, A., & Howell, W. G. (2023) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfac053 · Cited by 18
Donahue, S. T. (2023) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/00031224231173070 · Cited by 18
The people think what I think: False consensus and unelected elite misperception of public opinion
Furnas, A. C., & LaPira, T. M. (2024) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12833 · Cited by 22
Dyck, J. J., & Pearson‐Merkowitz, S. (2011) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912911411102 · Cited by 18
Citizens’ evaluations of campaign pledge fulfillment in Canada
Duval, D., & Pétry, F. (2018) · Party Politics · doi:10.1177/1354068818789968 · Cited by 21
Are all types of wrongdoing created equal in the eyes of voters?
Botero, S., Cornejo, R. C., Gamboa, L., Pavão, N. D. C., & Nickerson, D. W. (2019) · Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties · doi:10.1080/17457289.2019.1651322 · Cited by 19
It’s their fault: Partisan attribution bias and its association with voting intentions
Zell, E., Stockus, C. A., & Bernstein, M. J. (2021) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430221990084 · Cited by 18
FIGHTING POWER WITH POWER: THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE AS A WEAPON AGAINST CONCENTRATED PRIVATE POWER
Bagg, S. E. (2021) · Social Philosophy and Policy · doi:10.1017/s0265052521000297 · Cited by 18
Brewer, P. R., Hoffman, L. H., Harrington, R., Jones, P. E., & Lambe, J. L. (2014) · Presidential Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/psq.12158 · Cited by 18
The photosynthetic President: Converting sunshine into popularity
Cohen, A. H. (2011) · The Social Science Journal · doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2010.11.007 · Cited by 18
Kaplan, N. J., Park, D. K., & Gelman, A. (2012) · Presidential Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1741-5705.2012.04021.x · Cited by 18
Shtudiner, Z., Klein, G., & Kantor, J. (2016) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-015-0307-9 · Cited by 18
Popa, S. A., Rohrschneider, R., & Schmitt, H. (2016) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2016.07.001 · Cited by 18
Marino, G., & Iannelli, L. (2023) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2023.1174161 · Cited by 26
Larson, J., & Lewis, J. I. (2024) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055424000303 · Cited by 19
Liñeira, R. (2016) · Publius The Journal of Federalism · doi:10.1093/publius/pjw015 · Cited by 17
Converging on Truth : A Dynamic Perspective on Factual Debates in American Public Opinion
Stimson, J. A., & Wager, E. (2020) · Cited by 17
Vila‐Henninger, L. A. (2020) · Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour · doi:10.1111/jtsb.12255 · Cited by 19
Same scandal, different interpretations: politics of corruption, anger, and partisan bias in Mexico
Cornejo, R. C. (2023) · Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties · doi:10.1080/17457289.2022.2120487 · Cited by 17
Associations between COVID-19 vaccine uptake, race/ethnicity, and political party affiliation
Andersen, J. A., Gloster, E., Hall, S., Rowland, B., Willis, D. E., Kraleti, S. S., & McElfish, P. A. (2022) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-022-00379-2 · Cited by 21
Spälti, A. K., Lyons, B. A., Stoeckel, F., Stöckli, S., Szewach, P., Mérola, V., Stednitz, C., González, P. L., & Reifler, J. (2023) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/09636625231154131 · Cited by 17
The impact of public opinion on voting and policymaking
Ahrens, L. (2024) · Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s41358-024-00366-w · Cited by 23
Explaining Public Support (or Lack Thereof) for Extending Health Coverage to Undocumented Immigrants
Sánchez, G. R., Sanchez‐Youngman, S., Murphy, A. A., Goodin, A. S., Santos, R., & Valdez, R. B. (2011) · Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved · doi:10.1353/hpu.2011.0043 · Cited by 17
Is a corrupt government totally unacceptable?
Cordero, G., & Blais, A. (2017) · West European Politics · doi:10.1080/01402382.2017.1280746 · Cited by 18
Incongruent Voting or Symbolic Representation? Asymmetrical Representation in Congress, 2008–2014
Cayton, A. F., & Dawkins, R. (2020) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592720003746 · Cited by 17
Social penumbras predict political attitudes
Gelman, A., & Margalit, Y. M. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2019375118 · Cited by 17
Stimson, J. A., & Wager, E. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108876865 · Cited by 34
Vitriol, J. A., Ksiazkiewicz, A., & Farhart, C. E. (2018) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2018.04.009 · Cited by 18
Inequality and American governance
Bartels, L. M., Hečlo, H., Hero, R. E., & Jacobs, L. R. (2007) · Cited by 17
Self-citationVoter Information Search and Ranked Choice Voting
Ntounias, T. (2023) · Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy · doi:10.1089/elj.2022.0052 · Cited by 16
Polls and Elections: Opinion Formation, Polarization, and Presidential Reelection
Burden, B. C., & Hillygus, D. S. (2009) · Presidential Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1741-5705.2009.03693.x · Cited by 16
Polarization in COVID-19 Vaccine Discussion Networks
Amlani, S., Kiesel, S., & Butters, R. (2023) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x221148670 · Cited by 18
Preferences, Knowledge, and Citizen Probability Assessments of the Terrorism Risk of Nuclear Power
Li, Q., Fuhrmann, M., Early, B. R., & Vedlitz, A. (2012) · Review of Policy Research · doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.2011.00552.x · Cited by 16
Identity Sorting and Political Compromise
Davis, N. T. (2018) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x18799273 · Cited by 18
Who Owns What, and Why? The Origins of Issue Ownership Beliefs
Craig, S. C., & Cossette, P. S. (2020) · Politics & Policy · doi:10.1111/polp.12338 · Cited by 15
Partisanship, Economic Assessments, and Presidential Accountability
Ang, Z., Reeves, A., Rogowski, J. C., & Vishwanath, A. (2022) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12659 · Cited by 16
Partisanship as Cause, Not Consequence, of Participation
Rau, E. G. (2021) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/00104140211047406 · Cited by 19
VanDusky‐Allen, J., Utych, S., & Catalano, M. (2021) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10659129211056374 · Cited by 16
The madness of misperceptions: evaluating the ways anger contributes to misinformed beliefs
Carnahan, D., Ahn, S., & Turner, M. M. (2022) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqac041 · Cited by 18
Looking to the future: Prospective economic voting in 2008 Presidential Elections
Michelitch, K. G., Morales, M. A., Owen, A., & Tucker, J. A. (2012) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2012.04.002 · Cited by 16
Political Issues and the Dynamics of Vote Choice in 2008
Hillygus, D. S., & Henderson, M. (2010) · Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties · doi:10.1080/17457281003697263 · Cited by 16
An Experimental Approach to Economic Voting
Simonovits, G. (2015) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-015-9303-y · Cited by 16
The Contextual Causes of Issue and Party Voting in American Presidential Elections
Highton, B. (2010) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-009-9104-2 · Cited by 16
The Policy Consequences of Motivated Information Processing Among the Partisan Elite
Anderson, S. E., & Harbridge, L. (2013) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x13511658 · Cited by 18
Untangling myths and facts: Who supported the Québec Charter of Values?
Tessier, C., & Montigny, É. (2016) · French Politics · doi:10.1057/fp.2016.1 · Cited by 16
All Economics is Local: Spatial Aggregations of Economic Information
Fortunato, D., Swift, C. S., & Williams, L. K. (2016) · Political Science Research and Methods · doi:10.1017/psrm.2016.26 · Cited by 16
Elite polarization and correcting misinformation in the “post-truth era”.
Boussalis, C., & Coan, T. (2017) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.004 · Cited by 17
THE SCOPE AND GENERALITY OF AUTOMATIC AFFECTIVE BIASES IN POLITICAL THINKING: REPLY TO THE SYMPOSIUM
Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. G. (2012) · Critical Review · doi:10.1080/08913811.2012.719664 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Bartels, L. M.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bartels, Larry M.
- ORCID
- Bartels, Larry M.
- Venue
- Political Behavior
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 117-150
- ISSN
- 0190-9320 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6687
- OpenAlex
- W178177854
- Cited by
- 1,468
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 72 · 2025: 96 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 106 · 2020: 128 · 2019: 94 · 2018: 106 · 2017: 91 · 2016: 80 · 2015: 75 · 2014: 82 · 2013: 67 · 2012: 56
- FWCI
- 58.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Political Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Keywords
- partisan bias, party identification, partisan loyalty, political perception, opinion change, partisan polarization, Democrats and Republicans, political attitudes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
