Cited by 37Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchCircadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and related disorders

Strain Differences in Sleep Patterns of Healthy and Influenza-Infected Inbred Mice

Toth, L. A., Verhulst, S. J.·2003·Behavior Genetics

Abstract

Influenza-infected C57BL/6J and BALB/cByJ mice respectively develop increased slow-wave sleep (SWS) during the dark phase and reduced SWS during the light phase of the 24 hour circadian cycle. To determine whether similar or alternative variations in SWS develop after influenza infection in other inbred strains of mice, we characterized the sleep patterns of additional strains both before and after influenza infection. Three strains (A/J, BALB/cByJ, and C3H/HeJ) showed light-phase SWS suppression, two strains (C57BL/6J and DBA/2J) showed dark-phase SWS enhancement, and one strain (A/J) showed dark-phase SWS suppression. Three strains (AKR/J, C57BR/cdJ, and FVB/NJ) did not show significant changes in SWS time on day two post-inoculation. Core temperatures were correlated to change in SWS time after infection, but were not correlated to SWS during the baseline period. These data support and expand the existing literature that indicates genetic modulation of sleep both in healthy mice and in mice undergoing viral infection.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1023402709896

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Strain differences in mice responses indicate a genetic component affecting the sleep response to influenza virus.

    “There are strain differences in responses of mice to this challenge (Toth and Verhulst, 2003), indicating a genetic component affecting the sleep response to influenza virus (Trammell and Toth, 2008).”

    From Sleep health: Reciprocal regulation of sleep and innate immunity (2017) · cites this paper as Toth and Verhulst, 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Toth, L. A., & Verhulst, S. J.
Affiliations
SIU Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Toth, L. A.
Venue
Behavior Genetics
Published
2003-05
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
325-336
ISSN
  • 0001-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3297
OpenAlex
W122971914
Cited by
37
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavior Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ns040220-09, 5r01ns026429-10)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL-70522, R01HL070522)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA21765, P30CA021765)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-26429, NS-40220)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
influenza, slow-wave sleep, inbred mouse strains, core body temperature, C57BL/6J mice, BALB/cByJ mice
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Male, Mice, Inbred A, Mice, Inbred AKR, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Orthomyxoviridae Infections, Reference Values, Sleep, Species Specificity, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review