Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 167Chromosomal and Genetic VariationsEvolution and Genetic DynamicsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Modular Assembly of Genes and the Evolution of New Functions

Patthy, László·2003·Genetica

Abstract

Modular assembly of novel genes from existing genes has long been thought to be an important source of evolutionary novelty. Thanks to major advances in genomic studies it has now become clear that this mechanism contributed significantly to the evolution of novel biological functions in different evolutionary lineages. Analyses of completely sequenced bacterial, archaeal and eukaryotic genomes has revealed that modular assembly of novel constituents of various eukaryotic intracellular signalling pathways played a major role in the evolution of eukaryotes. Comparison of the genomes of single-celled eukaryotes, multicellular plants and animals has also shown that the evolution of multicellularity was accompanied by the assembly of numerous novel extracellular matrix proteins and extracellular signalling proteins that are absolutely essential for multicellularity. There is now strong evidence that exon-shuffling played a general role in the assembly of the modular proteins involved in extracellular communications of metazoa. Although some of these proteins seem to be shared by all major groups of metazoa, others are restricted to certain evolutionary lineages. The genomic features of the chordates appear to have favoured intronic recombination as evidenced by the fact that exon-shuffling continued to be a major source of evolutionary novelty during vertebrate evolution.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1024182432483

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Patthy, L., 1999b. Protein Evolution. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford.

Cited by

See all 167

Metadata

Authors
Patthy, L.
Affiliations
Institute of Molecular Life Sciences (HU)
Corresponding author
Patthy, László
Venue
Genetica
Published
2003-07
Volume
118
Issue
2-3
Pages
217-231
ISSN
  • 0016-6707 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6857
OpenAlex
W1570477334
Cited by
166
References
74
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
FWCI
15.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Genetica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
gene birth, exon shuffling, intracellular signaling, extracellular matrix proteins, evolution of multicellularity, chordate evolution, vertebrate evolution, animals, eukaryotic evolution
MeSH terms
Exons, Genes, Introns, Proteins, Genome, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.