Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 596

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evolution of biological complexity

Open access
Adami, Christoph, Ofria, Charles, Collier, Travis C.·2000·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

To make a case for or against a trend in the evolution of complexity in biological evolution, complexity needs to be both rigorously defined and measurable. A recent information-theoretic (but intuitively evident) definition identifies genomic complexity with the amount of information a sequence stores about its environment. We investigate the evolution of genomic complexity in populations of digital organisms and monitor in detail the evolutionary transitions that increase complexity. We show that, because natural selection forces genomes to behave as a natural “Maxwell Demon,” within a fixed environment, genomic complexity is forced to increase.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.97.9.4463

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.4159/harvard.9780674063396 · DOI · Paper page
  2. D W McShea Evolution (Lawrence, Kans) 50, 477–492 (1996).
  3. 10.1016/0167-2789(95)00107-F · doi:10.1016/0167-2789(95)00107-f
  4. 10.1016/S0167-2789(99)00179-7 · DOI
  5. 10.1086/406830 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1007/978-1-4612-1650-6 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1038/23245 · DOI · Paper page
  8. T Cavalier-Smith The Evolution of Genome Size, ed T Cavalier-Smith (Wiley, New York, 1985).
  9. M Dixon, E C Webb The Enzymes (Academic, New York, 1964).
  10. 10.1126/science.165.3891.349 · DOI · Paper page
  11. E Schrödinger What is Life? (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1945).
  12. L L Gatlin Information Theory and the Living System (Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 1972).
  13. 10.2307/2413283 · doi:10.2307/2413283
  14. 10.1063/1.3057866 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1007/BF00127087 · DOI
  16. 10.1063/1.881299 · DOI · Paper page
  17. R Dawkins The Selfish Gene (Oxford Univ. Press, London, 1976).
  18. D Deutsch The Fabric of Reality (Penguin, New York), pp. 179 (1997).
  19. 10.1038/225563a0 · DOI · Paper page
  20. J Maynard Smith On Evolution (Edinburgh Univ. Press, Edinburgh), pp. 92–99 (1972).
  21. 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90165-8 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1137/1104033 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1038/37108 · DOI · Paper page
  24. R E Lenski Population Genetics of Bacteria, Society for General Microbiology, Symposium 52, eds S Baumberg, J P W Young, S R Saunders, E M H Wellington (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.), pp. 193–215 (1995).
  25. 10.1086/285289 · DOI · Paper page
  26. S F Elena, V S Cooper, R E Lenski Nature (London) 387, 703–705 (1996).
  27. 10.1016/0027-5107(64)90047-8 · DOI · Paper page
  28. C Ofria, C T Brown, C Adami Introduction to Artificial Life, ed C Adami (Springer, New York), pp. 297–350 (1998).

Cited by

See all 596

Metadata

Authors
Adami, C., Ofria, C., & Collier, T. C.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2000-04-25
Volume
97
Issue
9
Pages
4463-4468
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2162170584
Cited by
596
References
2
FWCI
9.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolution of biological complexity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.97.9.4463
The paper
Adami, C., Ofria, C., & Collier, T. C. (2000). Evolution of biological complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.9.4463

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.