Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science

Comparing science communication theory with practice: an assessment and critique using Australian data

Metcalfe, J. (2019) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662518821022 · Cited by 138

Whose knowledge, whose values? An empirical analysis of power in transdisciplinary sustainability research

Fritz, L., & Binder, C. R. (2020) · European Journal of Futures Research · doi:10.1186/s40309-020-0161-4 · Cited by 105

Following from the front: theorizing deliberative facilitation

Moore, A. (2012) · Critical Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/19460171.2012.689735 · Cited by 81

Public engagement for inclusive and sustainable governance of climate interventions

Fritz, L., Baum, C. M., Low, S., & Sovacool, B. K. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-48510-y · Cited by 87

From Deliberation to Production: Public Participation in Science and Technology Policies of the European Commission (1998–2019)

Macq, H., Tancoigne, É., & Strasser, B. J. (2020) · Minerva · doi:10.1007/s11024-020-09405-6 · Cited by 79

The Making of Responsible Innovation

Macnaghten, P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108871044 · Cited by 79

Knowledge users’ perspectives and advice on how to improve knowledge exchange and mobilization in the case of a co-managed fishery

Young, N., Nguyen, V. M., Corriveau, M., Cooke, S. J., & Hinch, S. G. (2016) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.09.002 · Cited by 79

Inquiry, Instrumentalism, and the Public Understanding of Science

Rudolph, J. L. (2005) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20071 · Cited by 75

Deliberative democracy meets democratised science: a deliberative systems approach to global environmental governance

Berg, M., & Lidskog, R. (2017) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2017.1371919 · Cited by 78

Participatory design of citizen science experiments

Hidalgo, E. S., Ferrán-Ferrer, N., & Perelló, J. (2017) · Comunicar · doi:10.3916/c54-2018-03 · Cited by 100

The reflexive scientist: an approach to transforming public engagement

Salmon, R. A., Priestley, R., & Goven, J. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s13412-015-0274-4 · Cited by 76

Pig towers and in vitro meat: Disclosing moral worlds by design

Driessen, C., & Korthals, M. (2012) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312712457110 · Cited by 78

Locating Scientific Citizenship: The Institutional Contexts and Cultures of Public Engagement

Bickerstaff, K., Lorenzoni, I., Jones, M., & Pidgeon, N. (2010) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243909345835 · Cited by 75

Whose climate and whose ethics? Conceptions of justice in solar geoengineering modelling

McLaren, D. P. (2018) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.05.021 · Cited by 74

Synthesizing value sensitive design, responsible research and innovation, and energy justice: A conceptual review

Jenkins, K. E. H., Spruit, S. L., Milchram, C., Höffken, J. I., & Taebi, B. (2020) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101727 · Cited by 74

Evoking equity as a rationale for solar geoengineering research? Scrutinizing emerging expert visions of equity

Flegal, J. A., & Gupta, A. (2017) · International Environmental Agreements Politics Law and Economics · doi:10.1007/s10784-017-9377-6 · Cited by 75

Certain uncertainties: Modes of patient safety in healthcare

Jerak‐Zuiderent, S. (2012) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312712448122 · Cited by 77

An Emotional Deliberation Approach to Risk

Roeser, S., & Pesch, U. (2015) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243915596231 · Cited by 83

Citizen science for sustainable agriculture – A systematic literature review

Ebitu, L., Avery, H., Mourad, K. A., & Enyetu, J. (2021) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105326 · Cited by 72

Researchers as evaluators: tasks, tensions and politics

Langfeldt, L., & Kyvik, S. (2010) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-010-9382-y · Cited by 72

Knowing patients: The customer survey and the changing margins of accounting in healthcare

Pflueger, D. P. (2016) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2016.08.002 · Cited by 74

Toward inclusive tech policy design: a method for underrepresented voices to strengthen tech policy documents

Young, M., Magassa, L., & Friedman, B. (2019) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-019-09497-z · Cited by 71

National risk registers: Security scientism and the propagation of permanent insecurity

Hagmann, J., & Cavelty, M. D. (2012) · Security Dialogue · doi:10.1177/0967010611430436 · Cited by 71

‘Nothing to do with the science’: How an elite sociotechnical imaginary cements policy resistance to public perspectives on science and technology through the machinery of government

Smallman, M. (2019) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312719879768 · Cited by 71

Proceduralizing control and discretion: Human oversight in artificial intelligence policy

Koulu, R. (2020) · Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law · doi:10.1177/1023263x20978649 · Cited by 72

The persistence of ‘normal’ catchment management despite the participatory turn: Exploring the power effects of competing frames of reference

Cook, B. R., Kesby, M., Fazey, I., & Spray, C. J. (2013) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312713478670 · Cited by 70

Informed adaptation: Ethical considerations for adaptation researchers and decision-makers

Lacey, J., Howden, M. S., Cvitanovic, C., & Dowd, A.-M. (2015) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.011 · Cited by 78

Democratizing Expertise and Environmental Governance: Different Approaches to the Politics of Science and their Relevance for Policy Analysis

Carrozza, C. (2014) · Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning · doi:10.1080/1523908x.2014.914894 · Cited by 69

Subaltern forms of knowledge are required to boost local adaptation

Olazabal, M., Chu, E., Castán Broto, V., & Patterson, J. (2021) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2021.05.006 · Cited by 68

The Flexible Unity of Economics

Reay, M. J. (2012) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/666472 · Cited by 69

Fixing Technology with Society: The Coproduction of Democratic Deficits and Responsible Innovation at the OECD and the European Commission

Frahm, N., Doezema, T., & Pfotenhauer, S. M. (2021) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243921999100 · Cited by 66

Pure science or policy involvement? Ambiguous boundary-work for Swedish carbon cycle science

Lövbrand, E. (2006) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2006.10.003 · Cited by 68

Risk and Soft Impacts

Swierstra, T., & Molder, H. T. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_42 · Cited by 66

Reframing the governance of automotive automation: insights from UK stakeholder workshops

Cohen, T., Stilgoe, J., & Cavoli, C. (2018) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2018.1495030 · Cited by 65

Citizen Science and Policy

Schade, S., Pelacho, M., van Noordwijk, T., Vohland, K., Hecker, S., & Manzoni, M. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_18 · Cited by 65

Governance of new product development and perceptions of responsible innovation in the financial sector: insights from an ethnographic case study

Asante, K., Owen, R., & Williamson, G. (2014) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.882552 · Cited by 64

Processes of Inclusion, Cultures of Calculation, Structures of Power

Goven, J. (2006) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243906289612 · Cited by 66

An evolving science-society contract in India: The search for legitimacy in anticipatory risk governance

Gupta, A. (2011) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.07.011 · Cited by 62

What can science and technology studies learn from art and design? Reflections on ‘Synthetic Aesthetics’

Calvert, J. E., & Schyfter, P. (2016) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312716678488 · Cited by 64

Towards science in support of decision making: characterizing the supply of carbon cycle science

Dilling, L. (2006) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2006.10.008 · Cited by 62

Resilience scientists as change-makers—Growing the middle ground between science and advocacy?

Milkoreit, M., Moore, M., Schoon, M., & Meek, C. L. (2014) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2014.08.003 · Cited by 63

Understanding drivers, barriers and information sources for public participation in marine citizen science

Martin, V. Y., Christidis, L., Lloyd, D. J., & Pecl, G. T. (2016) · Journal of Science Communication · doi:10.22323/2.15020202 · Cited by 63

The SAFE FOODS framework for improved risk analysis of foods

König, A., Kuiper, H. A., Marvin, H. J. P., Boon, P., Busk, L., Cnudde, F., Cope, S., Davies, H. V., Dreyer, M., Frewer, L. J., et al. (2010) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.02.012 · Cited by 61

Universities claim to value community-engaged scholarship: So why do they discourage it?

Bell, M. Z., & Lewis, N. A. (2022) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/09636625221118779 · Cited by 60

Genetic frontiers for conservation: an assessment of synthetic biology and biodiversity conservation: technical assessment

Redford, K. H., Brooks, T. M., MacFarlane, N., & Adams, J. S. (2019) · doi:10.2305/iucn.ch.2019.05.en · Cited by 69

Public managers as catalysts of knowledge co-production? Investigating knowledge dynamics in local environmental policy

Maiello, A., Viegas, C. V., Frey, M., & Ribeiro, J. L. D. (2013) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.12.007 · Cited by 59

Citizen Science in Deliberative Systems: Participation, Epistemic Injustice, and Civic Empowerment

Herzog, L. M., & Lepenies, R. (2022) · Minerva · doi:10.1007/s11024-022-09467-8 · Cited by 68

Public Engagement for Informing Science and Technology Policy: What Do We Know, What Do We Need to Know, and How Will We Get There?

PytlikZillig, L. M., & Tomkins, A. J. (2011) · Review of Policy Research · doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.2011.00489.x · Cited by 60

Alter-ontologies: Towards a constituent politics in technoscience

Papadopoulos, D. (2010) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312710385853 · Cited by 59

“Response-able Practices” or “New Bureaucracies of Virtue”: The Challenges of Making RRI Work in Academic Environments

Felt, U. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64834-7_4 · Cited by 58

The challenges of building cosmopolitan climate expertise: the case of Germany

Beck, S. (2011) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.151 · Cited by 56

A Sociotechnical Framework for Governing Climate Engineering

Bellamy, R. (2015) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243915591855 · Cited by 56

Participation as Relational Space: A Critical Approach to Analysing Participation in Sustainability Research

Fritz, L., & Binder, C. R. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10082853 · Cited by 63

Anticipating governance challenges in synthetic biology: Insights from biosynthetic menthol

Ribeiro, B., & Philip Shapira, A. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.020 · Cited by 56

Three lessons from evidence-based medicine and policy: increase transparency, balance inputs and understand power

Oliver, K., & Pearce, W. (2017) · Palgrave Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-017-0045-9 · Cited by 79

Identifying what matters: Science education, science communication, and democracy

Lewenstein, B. V. (2015) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21201 · Cited by 55

Rethinking societal engagement under the heading of Responsible Research and Innovation: (novel) requirements and challenges

Bauer, A., Bogner, A., & Fuchs, D. (2021) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2021.1909812 · Cited by 55

Assessment of science and technologies: Advising for and with responsibility

Forsberg, E., Quaglio, G., O'Kane, H., Karapiperis, T., Woensel, L. V., & Arnaldi, S. (2015) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.12.004 · Cited by 55

Human centred science and technology—transdisciplinary foresight and co-creation as tools for active needs-based innovation governance

Gudowsky, N., & Peissl, W. (2016) · European Journal of Futures Research · doi:10.1007/s40309-016-0090-4 · Cited by 55

Framing Climate Change for Public Deliberation: What Role for Interpretive Social Sciences and Humanities?

Blue, G. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning · doi:10.1080/1523908x.2015.1053107 · Cited by 60

From risk assessment to in-context trajectory evaluation - GMOs and their social implications

Pavone, V., Goven, J., & Guarino, R. (2011) · Environmental Sciences Europe · doi:10.1186/2190-4715-23-3 · Cited by 54

Crowdsourcing the Human Gut. Is crowdsourcing also 'citizen science'?

Savio, L. D., Prainsack, B., & Buyx, A. (2016) · Journal of Science Communication · doi:10.22323/2.15030203 · Cited by 58

The "Problem of Extension" revisited: new modes of digital participation in science

Dickel, S., & Franzen, M. (2016) · Journal of Science Communication · doi:10.22323/2.15010206 · Cited by 54

Science and Technology Studies in Policy: The UK Synthetic Biology Roadmap

Marris, C., & Calvert, J. E. (2019) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243919828107 · Cited by 54

Hybridizing sustainability: towards a new praxis for the present human predicament

Benessia, A., Funtowicz, S., Bradshaw, G., Ferri, F., Ráez-Luna, E. F., & Medina, C. P. (2012) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-011-0150-4 · Cited by 91

H3Africa and the African Life Sciences Ecosystem: Building Sustainable Innovation

Dandara, C., Huzair, F., Borda‐Rodriguez, A., Chirikure, S., Okpechi, I. G., Warnich, L., & Masimirembwa, C. M. (2014) · OMICS A Journal of Integrative Biology · doi:10.1089/omi.2014.0145 · Cited by 53

Responsibility and Laboratory Animal Research Governance

McLeod, C. M., & Hartley, S. (2017) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243917727866 · Cited by 53

Responsibility through Anticipation? The ‘Future Talk’ and the Quest for Plausibility in the Governance of Emerging Technologies

López, S. U. (2021) · NanoEthics · doi:10.1007/s11569-021-00408-5 · Cited by 60

Public participation in mission-oriented innovation projects

Wiarda, M., Sobota, V., Janssen, M. J., van de Kaa, G., Yaghmaei, E., & Doorn, N. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122538 · Cited by 65

Monitoring the Impacts of Extraction: Science and Participation in the Governance of Mining in Peru

Himley, M. (2014) · Environment and Planning A Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a45631 · Cited by 53

How stakeholder interactions can reduce space for moral considerations in decision making: A contested CCS project in the Netherlands

Cuppen, E. H. W. J., Brunsting, S., Pesch, U., & Feenstra, Y. C. F. J. (2015) · Environment and Planning A Economy and Space · doi:10.1177/0308518x15597408 · Cited by 56

‘Opening up’ the governance of water-energy-food nexus: Towards a science-policy-society interface based on hybridity and humility

Urbinatti, A. M., Fontana, M. D., Stirling, A., & Giatti, L. L. (2020) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140945 · Cited by 53

Econometrics and Machine Learning

Arthur Charpentier, A., Flachaire, E., & Ly, A. (2019) · Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics · doi:10.24187/ecostat.2018.505d.1970 · Cited by 928

POLICY DESIGN FOR LEGITIMACY: EXPERT KNOWLEDGE, CITIZENS, TIME AND INCLUSION IN THE UNITED KINGDOM’S BIOTECHNOLOGY SECTOR

Montpetit, É. (2007) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00698.x · Cited by 51

Power and politics in framing bias in Artificial Intelligence policy

Ulnicane, I., & Aden, A. (2023) · Review of Policy Research · doi:10.1111/ropr.12567 · Cited by 59

Recasting Participation in Drug Policy

Lancaster, K., Ritter, A. J., & Diprose, R. (2018) · Contemporary Drug Problems · doi:10.1177/0091450918776024 · Cited by 51

Procedurally Robust Risk Assessment Framework for Novel Genetically Engineered Organisms and Gene Drives

Kuzma, J. (2019) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.12245 · Cited by 50

The Mutability of Biotechnology Patents

Carolan, M. (2010) · Theory Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0263276409350360 · Cited by 49

A synthetic review of the trust-participation nexus: Towards a relational concept of trust in energy system transformations to net zero

Otto, D., Chilvers, J., & Trdlicova, K. (2023) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2023.103140 · Cited by 53

Assessing the Participatory Potential of Systems Mapping

Király, G., Köves, A., Pataki, G., & Kiss, G. (2015) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/sres.2374 · Cited by 49

Geoengineering Justice: The Role of Recognition

Hourdequin, M. (2018) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243918802893 · Cited by 48

Innovation regimes based on collaborative and global tinkering: Synthetic biology and nanotechnology in the hackerspaces

Kera, D. (2013) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2013.07.004 · Cited by 48

Citizen Projects and Consensus-Building at the Danish Board of Technology

Jensen, C. B. (2005) · Acta Sociologica · doi:10.1177/0001699305056564 · Cited by 47

Narratives of Wildfire: Coverage in Four U.S. Newspapers, 1999-2003

Morehouse, B. J., & Sonnett, J. (2010) · Organization & Environment · doi:10.1177/1086026610385901 · Cited by 48

Environmental problem-solving in South Africa: harnessing creative imaginaries to address ‘wicked’ challenges and opportunities

Vogel, C. H., Scott, D., Fatti, C. C., & Sutherland, C. (2016) · South African Geographical Journal · doi:10.1080/03736245.2016.1217256 · Cited by 52

Solar Geoengineering: Social Science, Legal, Ethical, and Economic Frameworks

Flegal, J. A., Hubert, A., Morrow, D. R., & Moreno‐Cruz, J. (2019) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102017-030032 · Cited by 49

Responsible research and innovation: hopes and fears in the scientific community in Europe

CARRIER, M. J., & Gartzlaff, M. (2019) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2019.1692571 · Cited by 48

People of the sun: Local resistance and solar energy (in)justice in southern Portugal

Brás, O. R., Ferreira, V., & Carvalho, A. (2024) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103529 · Cited by 47

Public Involvement Designed to Circumvent Public Concern? The “Participatory Turn” in European Nuclear Activities

Sundqvist, G., & Elam, M. J. (2010) · Risk Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy · doi:10.2202/1944-4079.1046 · Cited by 47

Who knows best? Understanding the use of research-based knowledge in conservation conflicts

Hodgson, I. D., Redpath, S. M., Fischer, A., & Young, J. C. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.023 · Cited by 47

The role of learning in farmer-led innovation

Ensor, J., & de Bruin, A. (2022) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103356 · Cited by 65

Creating relevant knowledge in transdisciplinary research projects - Coping with inherent tensions

Schikowitz, A. (2019) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2019.1653154 · Cited by 46

De-centering environmental governance: A short history and analysis of democratic processes in the forest sector of Alberta, Canada

Parkins, J. R. (2006) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11077-006-9015-6 · Cited by 46

Framings of science-policy interactions and their discursive and institutional effects: examples from conservation and environmental policy

Pregernig, M. (2014) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-014-0806-3 · Cited by 49

Process, outcomes, virtues: the normative strategies of responsible research and innovation and the challenge of moral pluralism

Pellé, S. (2016) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2016.1258945 · Cited by 45

Conflicts in Transdisciplinary Research: Reviewing Literature and Analysing a Case of Climate Adaptation in Northwestern Germany

Siebenhüner, B. (2018) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.07.011 · Cited by 45

Toward Legitimate Governance of Solar Geoengineering Research: A Role for Sub-State Actors

Jinnah, S., Nicholson, S., & Flegal, J. A. (2018) · Ethics Policy & Environment · doi:10.1080/21550085.2018.1562526 · Cited by 44

Dis-inviting the Unruly Public

de Saille, S. (2014) · Science as Culture · doi:10.1080/09505431.2014.986323 · Cited by 44

Co-created citizen science: challenging cultures and practice in scientific research

Gunnell, J. L., Golumbic, Y. N., Hayes, T., & Cooper, M. (2021) · Journal of Science Communication · doi:10.22323/2.20050401 · Cited by 45

Why does pesticide pollution in water persist?

Hüesker, F., & Lepenies, R. (2021) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2021.11.016 · Cited by 44

Tecnologias da humildade: participação cidadã na governança da ciência*

Jasanoff, S. (2019) · Sociedade e Estado · doi:10.1590/s0102-6992-201934020009 · Cited by 7

Framing Technology Assessment: Risk, Vulnerability and Sustainable Development

Metzner-Szigeth, A. (2008) · Open Research (University of Surrey)

The Role of Laypeople in the Governance of Science and Technology

Bakuwa, J. (2014) · Cited by 1

In the democracies of DNA: ontological uncertainty and political order in three states

Jasanoff, S. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203113820-9

Gobernabilidad en la sociedad del conocimiento.

de Oviedo, J. A. L. C. U. (2007) · Memorias