Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science

Science governance and the politics of proper talk: governmental bioethics as a new technology of reflexive government

Braun, K., Moore, A., Herrmann, S. L., & Könninger, S. (2010) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/03085147.2010.510682 · Cited by 28

Commentary: Ackerknecht and 'Anticontagionism': a tale of two dichotomies

Hamlin, C. S. (2009) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyn256 · Cited by 27

Models of Public Engagement: Nanoscientists’ Understandings of Science–Society Interactions

Burri, R. V. (2018) · NanoEthics · doi:10.1007/s11569-018-0316-y · Cited by 26

Transgovernance: The Quest for Governance of Sustainable Development

Veld, R. J. I. '. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-28009-2_8 · Cited by 28

Biomedical Scientists' Perceptions of Ethical and Social Implications: Is There a Role for Research Ethics Consultation?

McCormick, J. B., Boyce, A. M., & Cho, M. K. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004659 · Cited by 26

Policy advice in technology assessment: Shifting roles, principles and boundaries

Bauer, A., & Kastenhofer, K. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.023 · Cited by 28

Gene editing of livestock

Middelveld, S., & Macnaghten, P. (2021) · Elementa Science of the Anthropocene · doi:10.1525/elementa.2020.00073 · Cited by 26

Integrating Public Participation, Transparency and Accountability Into Governance of Marketing Authorisation for Genome Editing Products

Nielsen, J. L., Eckstein, L., Nicol, D., & Stewart, C. L. (2021) · Frontiers in Political Science · doi:10.3389/fpos.2021.747838 · Cited by 29

Two tribes or more? The historical emergence of discourse coalitions of responsible research and innovation (rri) and Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI)

Randles, S., Tancoigne, É., & Joly, P. (2022) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2022.2061306 · Cited by 26

Models at Work—Models in Decision Making

Svetlova, E., & Dirksen, V. (2014) · Science in Context · doi:10.1017/s0269889714000209 · Cited by 25

Culture and the Democratization of Risk Management

Montpetit, É., & Rouillard, C. (2007) · Administration & Society · doi:10.1177/0095399707307310 · Cited by 26

Telecare research

Callén, B., Domènech, M., Gómez, D. L., & Tirado, F. (2009) · Alter · doi:10.1016/j.alter.2009.02.001 · Cited by 26

Futures of science with and for society: towards transformative policy orientations

van Oost, E., Kuhlmann, S., Ordóñez–Matamoros, G., & Stegmaier, P. (2016) · foresight · doi:10.1108/fs-10-2014-0063 · Cited by 25

Ideas, experts and governance

Haas, P. M. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139871365.003 · Cited by 29

Bioenergy experts and their imagined “obligatory publics” in the United States: Implications for public engagement and participation

Eaton, W. M., Burnham, M., Hinrichs, C. C., & Selfa, T. L. (2016) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2016.12.003 · Cited by 25

‘The interface of the future’: Mixed reality, intimate data and imagined temporalities

Egliston, B., & Carter, M. (2022) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517211063689 · Cited by 26

Reconsidering expertise for public policymaking: The challenges of contestability

Head, B. W. (2023) · Australian Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12613 · Cited by 39

Public Bioethics and Deliberative Democracy

Moore, A. (2010) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00836.x · Cited by 25

Engaging with Technologies in Practice: Travelling the Northwest Passage

Bal, R. A., & Mastboom, F. (2007) · Science as Culture · doi:10.1080/09505430701568651 · Cited by 25

Incommensurate risks and the regulator's dilemma: considering culture in the governance of genetically modified organisms

Satterfield, T. A., & Roberts, M. (2008) · New Genetics and Society · doi:10.1080/14636770802326877 · Cited by 24

Knowing wildfire risk: Scientific interactions with risk mitigation policy and practice in Victoria, Australia

Neale, T., Weir, J. K., & McGee, T. K. (2016) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.03.008 · Cited by 25

An Update of Public Perceptions of Synthetic Biology: Still Undecided?

Ancillotti, M., Rerimassie, V., Seitz, S. B., & Steurer, W. (2016) · NanoEthics · doi:10.1007/s11569-016-0256-3 · Cited by 25

But do they deliver? Participatory agenda setting on the test bed

Rosa, A. B., Gudowsky, N., & Warnke, P. (2018) · European Journal of Futures Research · doi:10.1186/s40309-018-0143-y · Cited by 30

Experiences of voluntary early participation in Environmental Impact Assessments in Chilean mining

Ocampo‐Melgar, A., Sagaris, L., & Gironás, J. (2018) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2018.09.004 · Cited by 25

Technologies of Transcendence at Singularity University

Boenig-Liptsin, M., & Hurlbut, J. B. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-11044-4_12 · Cited by 24

Estimating the Residential Population from Mobile Phone Data, an Initial Exploration

Sakarovitch, B., de Bellefon, M.-P., Givord, P., & Vanhoof, M. (2019) · Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics · doi:10.24187/ecostat.2018.505d.1968 · Cited by 23

Indicators are Relational: Navigating Knowledge and Power in the Development and Implementation of Coastal-Marine Indicators

Muhl, E., Armitage, D. R., Silver, J. J., Swerdfager, T., & Thorpe, H. (2022) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-022-01670-3 · Cited by 29

Restoration otherwise: Towards alternative coastal ecologies

Barra, M. P. (2023) · Environment and Planning D Society and Space · doi:10.1177/02637758221146179 · Cited by 28

Forward-looking activities: incorporating citizens’ visions

Gudowsky, N., Peissl, W., Sotoudeh, M., & Bechtold, U. (2012) · Poiesis & Praxis · doi:10.1007/s10202-012-0121-6 · Cited by 24

Subject Positioning and Deliberative Democracy: Understanding Social Processes Underlying Deliberation

O’Doherty, K. C., & DAVIDSON, H. J. (2010) · Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.2009.00429.x · Cited by 24

Mediating Science and Society in the EU and UK: From Information-Transmission to Deliberative Democracy?

Tlili, A., & Dawson, E. (2010) · Minerva · doi:10.1007/s11024-010-9160-0 · Cited by 25

Governance by campaign: the co-constitution of food issues, publics and expertise through new information and communication technologies

Schneider, T., Eli, K., McLennan, A. K., Dolan, C. S., Lezaun, J., & Ulijaszek, S. J. (2017) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2017.1363264 · Cited by 24

Considering expert takeovers in citizen involvement processes

Repo, P., & Matschoss, K. (2019) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2019.1568145 · Cited by 24

Technological Fix or Divisible Object of Collective Concern? Histories of Conflict over the Geological Disposal of Nuclear Waste in Sweden and France

Barthe, Y., Elam, M. J., & Sundqvist, G. (2019) · Science as Culture · doi:10.1080/09505431.2019.1645108 · Cited by 24

The paradox of deliberative democracy: The National Action Committee on the Status of Women and Canada's policy on reproductive technology

Montpetit, É., Scala, F., & Fortier, I. (2004) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1023/b:olic.0000048531.47103.3a · Cited by 24

Perfecting the Human: Posthuman Imaginaries and Technologies of Reason

Jasanoff, S. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-11044-4_4 · Cited by 23

Public and Stakeholder Engagement in Developing Human Heritable Genome Editing Policies: What Does it Mean and What Should it Mean?

Iltis, A. S., Hoover, S., & Matthews, K. R. W. (2021) · Frontiers in Political Science · doi:10.3389/fpos.2021.730869 · Cited by 29

Anticipation and modal power: Opening up and closing down the momentum of sociotechnical systems

López, S. U. (2022) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/03063127221111469 · Cited by 23

Interdisciplinary research in hazards and disaster risk

Donovan, A. R., Morin, J., & Walshe, R. A. (2023) · Progress in Environmental Geography · doi:10.1177/27539687231183448 · Cited by 23

Public attitudes and emotions toward novel carbon removal methods in alternative sociotechnical scenarios

Cox, E., Bellamy, R., & Waller, L. (2024) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ad5dd0 · Cited by 23

Beyond Conversation: Some Lessons for Nanoethics

Ferrari, A., & Nordmann, A. (2010) · NanoEthics · doi:10.1007/s11569-010-0098-3 · Cited by 23

Opening Up for Participation in Agro-Biodiversity Conservation: The Expert-Lay Interplay in a Brazilian Social Movement

Delgado, A. M. (2008) · Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10806-008-9117-6 · Cited by 23

Protecting the rain barrel: Discourses and the roles of science in a suburban environmental controversy

Bocking, S. (2005) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644010500257896 · Cited by 23

The concept of risk society as a model for risk regulation – its hidden and not so hidden ambitions, side effects, and risks

Bergkamp, L. (2016) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2016.1153500 · Cited by 23

Conducting fit‐for‐purpose food safety risk assessments

Devos, Y., Elliott, K. C., Macdonald, P., McComas, K. A., Parrino, L., Vrbos, D., Robinson, T. P., Spiegelhalter, D. J., & Gallani, B. (2019) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170707 · Cited by 22

Evolving scientific research governance in Australia: a case study of engaging interested publics in nanotechnology research

Katz, E., Solomon, F., Mee, W., & Lovel, R. R. (2009) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662507082016 · Cited by 22

The public perception of climate change in Taiwan and its paradigm shift

Chou, K.-T. (2013) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.016 · Cited by 22

Acknowledging Risk, Trusting Expertise, and Coping With Uncertainty: Citizens' Deliberations on Spraying an Insect Population

Gustafsson, K. M., & Lidskog, R. (2011) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920.2011.620598 · Cited by 22

An overview of the role of society and risk in xenotransplantation

Sobbrio, P., & Jorqui, M. (2014) · Xenotransplantation · doi:10.1111/xen.12120 · Cited by 22

A twenty-first century Citizens’ POLIS: introducing a democratic experiment in electronic citizen participation in science and technology decision-making

Williams, S. N. (2009) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662509104726 · Cited by 22

A collaborative approach to groundwater protection: The Rural Water Quality Program for Waterloo Region

Simpson, H. C., & de Loë, R. C. (2014) · Canadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques · doi:10.1080/07011784.2014.914789 · Cited by 27

From responsibilization to responsiveness through metrics: Smart meter deployment in Australia

Chandrashekeran, S. (2020) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.07.014 · Cited by 23

Inside Deliberative Experiments: Dynamics of Subjectivity in Science Policy Deliberations

Görsdorf, A. (2006) · Policy and Society · doi:10.1016/s1449-4035(06)70078-9 · Cited by 22

Rationalising a volcanic crisis through literature: Montserratian verse and the descriptive reconstruction of an island

Donovan, A. R., Oppenheimer, C., & Bravo, M. T. (2011) · Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research · doi:10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2011.03.010 · Cited by 21

Public participation and democratization: effects on the production and consumption of science and technology

Invernizzi, N. (2020) · Tapuya Latin American Science Technology and Society · doi:10.1080/25729861.2020.1835225 · Cited by 21

Bespoke Regulation for Bespoke Medicine? A Comparative Analysis of Bioprinting Regulation in Europe, the USA and Australia

Nielsen, J. L., Kaldor, J. C., Irwin, A., Stewart, C. L., & Nicol, D. (2021) · Journal of 3D Printing in Medicine · doi:10.2217/3dp-2021-0011 · Cited by 21

Non‐experts’ participation in processes of scientific knowledge creation: The case of Citizen Science

Giardullo, P. (2023) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.13100 · Cited by 21

Ethical Perspectives on Synthetic Biology

Bensaude‐Vincent, B. (2013) · Biological Theory · doi:10.1007/s13752-013-0137-8 · Cited by 21

From Knowledge Co-production to Transdisciplinary Research: Lessons from the Quest to Produce Socially Robust Knowledge

Weichselgartner, J., & Truffer, B. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16477-9_5 · Cited by 21

Public prophylaxis: Pandemic influenza, pharmaceutical prevention and participatory governance

Caduff, C. (2010) · BioSocieties · doi:10.1057/biosoc.2010.1 · Cited by 20

Wissensgesellschaft und wissenschaftliche Politikberatung

Weingart, P. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-03483-2_2 · Cited by 20

Disentangling the social complexities of assisted migration through deliberative methods

Hagerman, S., & Kozak, R. A. (2021) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.13667 · Cited by 20

The Value of Citizen Participation in Technology Assessment, Responsible Research and Innovation, and Sustainable Development

Weinberger, N., Woll, S., Kyba, C. C. M., & Schulte-Römer, N. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132111613 · Cited by 20

The Challenge of Quantification: An Interdisciplinary Reading

Fiore, M. D., Kuc-Czarnecka, M. E., Piano, S. L., Puy, A., & Saltelli, A. (2022) · Minerva · doi:10.1007/s11024-022-09481-w · Cited by 21

Who engages with science, and how? An empirical typology of Europeans’ science engagement

Losi, L. (2023) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/09636625231164340 · Cited by 20

Doing co-creation: power and critique in the development of a European health data infrastructure

Felt, U., Öchsner, S., Rae, R., & Osipova, E. (2023) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2023.2235931 · Cited by 23

Part 2: Transformation from Wall Street to Well‐being

McIntyre-Mills, J. J., & de Vries, D. (2012) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/sres.2133 · Cited by 21

The limits of policy: Public acceptance and the reform of science and technology governance

Todt, O. (2011) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.02.007 · Cited by 20

Science to the people! (and experimental politics): Searching for the roots of participatory discourse in science and technology in the 1970s in France

Quet, M. (2013) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662512469011 · Cited by 20

Creating ‘Local Publics’: Responsibility and Involvement in Decision-Making on Technologies with Local Impacts

Pesch, U., Huijts, N. M. A., Bombaerts, G. J. T., Doorn, N., & Hunka, A. D. (2020) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-020-00199-0 · Cited by 25

Linking deliberative evaluation with integrated assessment and modelling: A methodological framework and its application to agricultural water management

Allain, S., Plumecocq, G., & Leenhardt, D. (2020) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2020.102566 · Cited by 20

Taming the wild life of genes by law? Genes reconfiguring solidarity in private insurance

Hoyweghen, I. V. (2010) · New Genetics and Society · doi:10.1080/14636778.2010.528190 · Cited by 20

Why public dismissal of nutrition science makes sense

Penders, B. (2018) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-10-2017-0558 · Cited by 20

Governing Risky Technologies

Macnaghten, P., & Chilvers, J. (2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119962748.ch6 · Cited by 20

Resistencias epistémico-políticas frente a la privatización de las semillas y los saberes colectivos

Vidal, N. H., & Escobar, L. G. (2019) · Revista Colombiana de Antropología · doi:10.22380/2539472x.798 · Cited by 19

Imagined futures for livestock gene editing: Public engagement in the Netherlands

Middelveld, S., Macnaghten, P., & Meijboom, F. L. B. (2022) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/09636625221111900 · Cited by 19

Extractive sector governance: does a nexus of accountability render local extractive industries transparency initiatives ineffective?

Moses, O., Ehalaiye, D., Sorola, M., & Lassou, P. J. C. (2023) · Meditari Accountancy Research · doi:10.1108/medar-08-2021-1426 · Cited by 19

What Constitutes Adequate Public Consultation? Xenotransplantation Proceeds in Australia

Cook, P. (2010) · Journal of Bioethical Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s11673-010-9269-8 · Cited by 19

Heads in the clouds: knowledge democracy as a Utopian dream

Turnhout, E. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-11381-9_3 · Cited by 19

Resilience and ‘technicity’: challenges and opportunities for new knowledge practices in disaster planning

Jon, I. (2018) · Resilience · doi:10.1080/21693293.2018.1461481 · Cited by 19

Embedding European citizen visions in sustainability transition: Comparative analysis across 30 European countries

Matschoss, K., Repo, P., & Timonen, P. (2019) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2019.102437 · Cited by 19

Political Dimensions of Environmental Citizenship

Levinson, R., Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, D., Bedsted, B., Manov, B. F., & Hadjichambis, A. C. (2020) · Environmental discourses in science education · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-20249-1_2 · Cited by 19

Re-visioning public engagement with emerging technology: A digital methods experiment on ‘vertical farming’

Waller, L., & Gugganig, M. (2021) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662521990977 · Cited by 19

Health and medical research funding agencies’ promotion of public engagement within research: a qualitative interview study exploring the United Kingdom context

van Bekkum, J. E., Fergie, G., & Hilton, S. (2016) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-016-0093-4 · Cited by 19

Revealing a paradox in scientific advice to governments: the struggle between modernist and reflexive logics within the PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency

Kunseler, E.-M. (2016) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/palcomms.2016.29 · Cited by 18

Balancing authority and meaning in global environmental assessment: An analysis of organisational logics and modes in IPBES

Montana, J. (2020) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.017 · Cited by 18

Situated Ethics in Development: STS Insights for a Pragmatic Approach to Development Policy and Practice

Ransom, E., Grady, C., Broyles, L. M. T., & Bain, C. (2021) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/01622439211052685 · Cited by 21

Experimentation, learning, and dialogue: an RRI-inspired approach to dual-use of concern

Ulnicane, I., Mahfoud, T., & Salles, A. L. F. (2022) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2022.2094071 · Cited by 18

How Can Psychology Contribute to Climate Change Governance? A Systematic Review

Freschi, G., Menegatto, M., & Zamperini, A. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su151914273 · Cited by 20

No easy way out: towards a framework concept of long-term governance

Scheer, D., Venghaus, S., Sardo, S., Stark, S., Kuppler, S., Schmidt, M., & Hoyer-Klick, C. (2025) · Energy Sustainability and Society · doi:10.1186/s13705-025-00513-3 · Cited by 27

Seeking policy-relevant knowledge: a comparative study of the contextualisation of participatory scenarios for the Narew River and Lake Peipsi

Kaljonen, M., Varjopuro, R., Giełczewski, M., & Iital, A. (2011) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2011.10.006 · Cited by 18

Fukushima: probing the analytical and epistemological limits of risk analysis

Hagmann, J. (2012) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2012.657223 · Cited by 18

Actions towards the joint production of knowledge: the risk of salmon aquaculture on American Lobster

Maillet, D. C., Wiber, M. G., & Barnett, A. J. (2017) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2017.1351471 · Cited by 18

Social forestry movements and science-policy networks: The politics of the forestry incentives program in Guatemala

Aguilar‐Støen, M. (2018) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.01.014 · Cited by 20

Heartware as a driver for campus sustainability: Insights from an action-oriented exploratory case study

Mohamad, Z. F., Kadir, S. N. A., Nasaruddin, A., Sakai, N., Zuki, F. M., Hussein, H., Sulaiman, A. H., & Salleh, M. S. A. M. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.111 · Cited by 18

Narrative as a resource for inclusive governance: a UK–Brazil comparison of public responses to nanotechnology

Macnaghten, P., & Guivant, J. S. (2020) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2020.1842643 · Cited by 18

Examining the Role of Carbon Capture and Storage Through an Ethical Lens

Medvecky, F., Lacey, J., & Ashworth, P. (2013) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-013-9474-z · Cited by 19

Governance of genetic biocontrol technologies for invasive fish

Gilna, B., Kuzma, J., & Otts, S. S. (2013) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1007/s10530-012-0367-x · Cited by 17

Governance of EU research policy: Charting forms of scientific democracy in the European Research Area

Ryan, L. (2014) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/scu047 · Cited by 17

“Fixing” climate change through carbon capture and storage: Situating industrial risk cultures

Kuch, D. (2017) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2017.02.001 · Cited by 20

Tecnologias da humildade: participação cidadã na governança da ciência*

Jasanoff, S. (2019) · Sociedade e Estado · doi:10.1590/s0102-6992-201934020009 · Cited by 7

Framing Technology Assessment: Risk, Vulnerability and Sustainable Development

Metzner-Szigeth, A. (2008) · Open Research (University of Surrey)

The Role of Laypeople in the Governance of Science and Technology

Bakuwa, J. (2014) · Cited by 1

In the democracies of DNA: ontological uncertainty and political order in three states

Jasanoff, S. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203113820-9

Gobernabilidad en la sociedad del conocimiento.

de Oviedo, J. A. L. C. U. (2007) · Memorias