The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Science and Technology Studies scholar Sheila Jasanoff discusses the fabricated and performative nature of 'human pretensions of control over technological systems'. 44”
From Proceduralizing control and discretion: Human oversight in artificial intelligence policy (2020) · cites this paper as [44]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,001
Learning from Incidents and Incident Reporting
Rossignol, N., & Oudheusden, M. V. (2016) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243916686168 · Cited by 6
Lost in delegation? (Dis)organizing for sustainability
Allen, S. A., Brigham, M., & Marshall, J. (2018) · Scandinavian Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2017.11.002 · Cited by 6
Exploring the degree of delegated authority for the peer review of societal impact
Derrick, G., & Samuel, G. N. (2017) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/scx091 · Cited by 9
Sustainability and engagement: strange bedfellows in the undergraduate textbook
Larkins, M. L., Wright, W., & Dann, S. L. (2018) · International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/ijshe-09-2017-0152 · Cited by 6
Biomedicine, self and society: An agenda for collaboration and engagement
Pickersgill, M. D., Chan, S., Haddow, G., Laurie, G. T., Sridhar, D., Sturdy, S., & Cunningham‐Burley, S. (2019) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15043.1 · Cited by 6
Quantification – Affordances and Limits
Carson, J. (2020) · Scholarly Assessment Reports · doi:10.29024/sar.24 · Cited by 6
Blue, G., & Davidson, D. J. (2020) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abbf14 · Cited by 6
Contextualizing Security Innovation: Responsible Research and Innovation at the Smart Border?
Klimburg-Witjes, N., & Huettenrauch, F. C. (2021) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-021-00292-y · Cited by 6
Pellizzoni, L., & Centemeri, L. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning · doi:10.1080/1523908x.2021.2022467 · Cited by 6
Gouet, C., Rodríguez, D. S., Maulén, W. R., Almarza, A. R., & Bunster, D. O. (2022) · Tapuya Latin American Science Technology and Society · doi:10.1080/25729861.2022.2117492 · Cited by 6
Humility and Modesty in Leadership - a Bibliometric Perspective
Žiaran, P., Kučerová, R., Melasová, K., & Pokorná, H. (2015) · Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis · doi:10.11118/actaun201563062221 · Cited by 6
A dignidade das pertenças e os limites do neoliberalismo: catástrofes, capitalismo, Estado e vítimas
Mendes, J. M. (2016) · Sociologias · doi:10.1590/15174522-018004303 · Cited by 6
Responsible Research and Innovation and the Governance of Human Enhancement
Gorgoni, G. (2018) · NanoEthics · doi:10.1007/s11569-018-0326-9 · Cited by 6
Franzen, M. (2019) · Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie · doi:10.1007/s11614-019-00345-4 · Cited by 6
Dimensions of Medialization. Concluding Remarks
Weingart, P., Rödder, S., & Franzen, M. (2011) · Sociology of the sciences/Sociology of the sciences yearbook · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2085-5_19 · Cited by 6
Actors’ Perceptions and Strategies: Forests and Pathways to Sustainability
Lindahl, K. B. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-14218-0_8 · Cited by 6
Engaging nanotechnologies: a case study of 'upstream' public engagement
Macnaghten, P. (2009) · Ambiente & sociedade · doi:10.1590/s1414-753x2009000100002 · Cited by 6
Gjefsen, M. D. (2016) · Innovation The European Journal of Social Science Research · doi:10.1080/13511610.2016.1214819 · Cited by 6
New Science Institutions for Global Sustainability
van der Hel, S. (2020) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · doi:10.33540/39 · Cited by 7
Sample, M., & Racine, E. (2021) · Advances in Neuroethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-64590-8_7 · Cited by 5
Shifting tides: How public perceptions of GPT regulation evolved before and after GPT-4 on Quora
Xi, Y., & Ngan, L. H. M. (2025) · Telecommunications Policy · doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103001 · Cited by 5
Nguyen, A. T. T., & Pham, V. K. (2025) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.70267 · Cited by 5
Sarku, R., & Kranjac-Berisavljevic, G. (2025) · Cogent Food & Agriculture · doi:10.1080/23311932.2025.2588880 · Cited by 5
Beyond Deliberation: Alternative Forms of Public (Dis)engagement With Science
Losi, L. (2024) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/10755470241269998 · Cited by 5
Skarlatidou, A., Moreu, M., & Haklay, M. (2024) · Annals of the American Association of Geographers · doi:10.1080/24694452.2024.2426714 · Cited by 5
Transnational Science Cooperation for Sustainable Development
Schwachula, A. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-57938-8_4 · Cited by 5
Machado, H., Neiva, L., Granja, R., & Silva, S. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-99144-5.09001-6 · Cited by 5
Sardo, A. M., & Laggan, S. (2024) · Research for All · doi:10.14324/rfa.08.1.04 · Cited by 5
Let’s Talk About… Synthetic Biology—Emerging Technologies and the Public
Seitz, S. B. (2015) · Ethics of science and technology assessment/Wissenschaftsethik und Technikfolgenbeurteilung · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21088-9_8 · Cited by 5
Preparing for the worst: public perceptions of risk management innovations
Liu, B. F., Roberts, H. A., Petrun, E. L., Ackerman, G. A., Smith, D., & Iles, I. A. (2016) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2016.1153508 · Cited by 5
Implementing Responsible Research and Innovation for Care Robots through BS 8611
Stahl, B. C. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-22698-5_10 · Cited by 5
Shkaruba, A., & Skryhan, H. (2018) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2018.11.024 · Cited by 5
Davies, S. R. (2018) · Cultural Politics an International Journal · doi:10.1215/17432197-7093366 · Cited by 6
Bird, S. J. (2019) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-019-00159-3 · Cited by 5
Aubert, P., Ruat, R., Treyer, S., & Rankovic, A. (2020) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.008 · Cited by 5
Law, Environment, and the “Nondismal” Social Sciences
Boyd, W., Kysar, D. A., & Rachlinski, J. J. (2011) · Annual Review of Law and Social Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102510-105408 · Cited by 5
The Sublime and the Pale Blue Dot: Reclaiming the Cosmos for Earthly Nature
Harvey, M. (2022) · Environmental Values · doi:10.3197/096327122x16569260361832 · Cited by 5
Data Practices and Sustainable Development Goals: Organising Knowledge for Sustainable Futures
Beaulieu, A. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-7084-8_18 · Cited by 5
Luthra, A., Cunningham, K., Fraser, A. M., Pandey, A., Rana, S., & Singh, V. (2022) · Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes · doi:10.1111/cag.12799 · Cited by 5
Towards Governance of Energy Security
Valkenburg, G., & Gracceva, F. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-802970-1.00008-5 · Cited by 5
Matters of Dwelling: Releasing the Genetically Engineered Aedes Aegypti Mosquito in Key West
Herndl, C. G., & Zarlengo, T. (2017) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2017.1397799 · Cited by 5
Viglio, J. E., Monteiro, M. S. A., & Ferreira, L. D. C. (2018) · Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais · doi:10.1590/339808/2018 · Cited by 5
Smith, D., Mulhall, P. J., Hart, C., & Gunstone, R. (2018) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-018-9765-0 · Cited by 5
Laurans, Y., Leflaive, X., & Rankovic, A. (2020) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.007 · Cited by 5
Transforming scholarship to co-create sustainable futures
Chabay, I., Renn, O., van der LEEUW, S., & Droy, S. (2021) · Global Sustainability · doi:10.1017/sus.2021.18 · Cited by 5
Synthetic biology: Too early for assessments? A review of synthetic biology assessments in Germany
van Doren, D., & Heyen, N. B. (2014) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/scu034 · Cited by 5
Dreyer, M., & Renn, O. (2007) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1533/9781845692506.5.534 · Cited by 5
Shifting Climate Sensitivities, Shifting Paradigms: Tree-Ring Science in a Dynamic World
Biermann, C., & Grissino‐Mayer, H. D. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-71461-5_10 · Cited by 5
Interpreting practice: producing practical wisdom from qualitative study of practitioner experience
Nicholas, G., & Foote, J. (2020) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645579.2020.1799635 · Cited by 5
The technology of need: technology of sustainability?
Mercado, A., Córdova, K., & Vessuri, H. (2022) · Tapuya Latin American Science Technology and Society · doi:10.1080/25729861.2022.2041789 · Cited by 5
Waste picker rights and social inclusion: the creation of a university with knowledge democracy
Gutberlet, J., & Vallin, I. D. C. (2024) · Detritus · doi:10.31025/2611-4135/2024.18358 · Cited by 4
Karmakar, G., & Pal, P. (2025) · Journal for Cultural Research · doi:10.1080/14797585.2025.2506048 · Cited by 4
Sharma, V. (2025) · Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences · doi:10.52711/2321-5828.2025.00012 · Cited by 4
Structure of scientific knowledge flows to intergovernmental organizations
Asatani, K., Iwata, Y., Tomokiyo, Y., Mahfouz, B., Yarime, M., & Sakata, I. (2026) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2514861123 · Cited by 8
How to? Co-productionist relational engagement in European Union energy projects
Kools, V. M. E., & Höffken, J. I. (2025) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103911 · Cited by 4
Learning from the Global South: Co-producing Evidence for Climate Change Policy
Calfucoy, P., & Rudnick, A. (2016) · Development · doi:10.1057/s41301-017-0106-9 · Cited by 4
Reexamining Rulemaking in an Era of Internet-Enabled Participation
Jordan, S. R., & Watson, K. L. (2019) · Public Performance & Management Review · doi:10.1080/15309576.2018.1561377 · Cited by 4
Knowledge on Stage: Public Roles of Scientists In Times of Communicative Abundance
Mendonça, R. F., & Castelfranchi, Y. (2022) · Javnost - The Public · doi:10.1080/13183222.2022.2042786 · Cited by 5
Ramachandran, A., Achar, J. C., Green, G., Hanson-Wright, B., Leiter, S., & Öberg, G. (2022) · Engaging Science Technology and Society · doi:10.17351/ests2022.1179 · Cited by 4
Sustainable Development Within Knowledge Democracies: An Emerging Governance Problem
Veld, R. J. I. '. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-28009-2_1 · Cited by 5
The fate of waste in H awaii: Technology assessment and solid waste planning in H awaii, 1968–78
Howell, J. P. (2014) · Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography · doi:10.1111/sjtg.12089 · Cited by 4
Scott, D. (2013) · African Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.2989/1814232x.2013.842932 · Cited by 4
Introduction: The Biotechnology Revolution and Comparative Policy Studies
Allison, C. R. (2009) · Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/13876980903222856 · Cited by 4
Streitkultur and the governance of genetic testing and insurance in Germany
Lander, J., & Hoyweghen, I. V. (2014) · New Genetics and Society · doi:10.1080/14636778.2013.873336 · Cited by 4
Coinquiry for Environmental Sustainability: A Review of the UK Beacons for Public Engagement
Genus, A. (2014) · Environment and Planning C Government and Policy · doi:10.1068/c1174j · Cited by 4
JOINING THE SOCIOMATERIAL DEBATE
Pozzebon, M., Diniz, E. H., Mitev, N., de Vaujany, F., Cunha, M. P. E., & Leca, B. L. (2017) · Revista de Administração de Empresas · doi:10.1590/s0034-759020170602 · Cited by 4
Can Mobile Phone Data Improve the Measurement of International Tourism in France?
Cousin, G., & Hillaireau, F. (2019) · Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics · doi:10.24187/ecostat.2018.505d.1967 · Cited by 7
Gene Editing for the EU Agrifood: Risks and Promises in Science Regulation
Leone, L. (2019) · European Journal of Risk Regulation · doi:10.1017/err.2019.55 · Cited by 4
Bernier, L., Legault, G. A., Daniel, C.-É., Kocsis-Bédard, S., Béland, J.-P., Bellemare, C. A., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, H., Parent, M., & Patenaude, J. (2020) · Canadian Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.7202/1070226ar · Cited by 4
Is mathematical modelling an instrument of knowledge co-production?
Vecchione, E., & Chalabi, Z. (2021) · Interdisciplinary Science Reviews · doi:10.1080/03080188.2020.1855771 · Cited by 4
Missing the outbreak for the germs
Baur, P. (2021) · Elementa Science of the Anthropocene · doi:10.1525/elementa.2021.00041 · Cited by 4
Park, J. K., Bagg, S. E., & Lewis, A. C. F. (2023) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2023.2272918 · Cited by 4
Meneses, D. H. L. (2024) · Climate and Development · doi:10.1080/17565529.2024.2369617 · Cited by 4
The Role of Media References During Public Deliberation Sessions
Capurro, G., Dag, H., Longstaff, H., & Secko, D. M. (2015) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547015574015 · Cited by 4
The Realpolitik of Nuclear Risk: When Political Expediency Trumps Technical Democracy
Saito, H., & Pahk, S.-H. (2016) · Science Technology and Society · doi:10.1177/0971721815627251 · Cited by 4
Official Statistics 4.0: The Era of Digitisation and Globalisation
Radermacher, W. J. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-31492-7_4 · Cited by 4
Geo-scientific Culture and Geoethics
Nagy, G. M., & Bohle, M. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-79028-8_14 · Cited by 4
La démocratie électronique et l’Open Government de Barack Obama sous l’œil critique des STS
Lascoumes, P. (2010) · Presses des Mines eBooks · doi:10.4000/books.pressesmines.751 · Cited by 4
The Microphysics of Accountability
Wieser, B. (2011) · Accountability in Research · doi:10.1080/08989621.2011.575034 · Cited by 4
Contemporary high-profile scientists and their interactions with the community
Smith, D., Mulhall, P. J., Hart, C., & Gunstone, R. (2016) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1201236 · Cited by 4
Nuclear fission technology in Spain: History and social concerns
Urtasun, A. I. A., Luquín, A., & Garrido, J. J. (2016) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662516659035 · Cited by 4
Pesquisa e desenvolvimento responsável? Traduzindo ausências a partir da nanotecnologia em Portugal
Fonseca, P. D. F. C., & Pereira, T. S. (2017) · História Ciências Saúde-Manguinhos · doi:10.1590/s0104-59702017000100005 · Cited by 4
Weinkle, J. (2017) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2017.1378250 · Cited by 4
Use of Google Trends Data in Banque de France Monthly Retail Trade Survey
Robin, F. (2019) · Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics · doi:10.24187/ecostat.2018.505d.1965 · Cited by 5
Uncertain Risks: Salmon Science, Harm, and Ignorance in Canada
Viatori, M. S. (2019) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1111/aman.13241 · Cited by 4
Interstitial Silences in Sociotechnical Change: The Case of Genetically Modified ‘Tearless’ Onions
Edwards, S., Vallance, S., & Montgomery, R. L. (2021) · Science as Culture · doi:10.1080/09505431.2021.2019214 · Cited by 3
When digital technologies stumble: Exnovating for conservation science and practice
Urzedo, D., & Chakori, S. (2025) · Conservation Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/csp2.70112 · Cited by 3
Why embracing uncertainty means rethinking development
Scoones, I. (2025) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2025.107256 · Cited by 3
Bauwens, T., Friant, M. C., Beumer, K., & Velasco‐Herrejón, P. (2026) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2026.105458 · Cited by 4
How Citizens View Science Communication
Castro, C. M., Krzewińska, A., & Dzimińska, M. (2024) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003400943 · Cited by 3
Who engages whom?—Deficit communication in participatory science governance as democratic deficit
Loureiro, P. M., & Horta, H. (2024) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/scae014 · Cited by 3
Cambio climático e incertidumbres dóxicas. Entre el negacionismo y el activismo
Torre, R. R., & Gallego, M. J. C. (2025) · Papers Revista de Sociologia · doi:10.5565/rev/papers.3329 · Cited by 3
When citizens judge science: Crowd evaluations in Mode 2 knowledge production
Franzoni, C., Sauermann, H., & Marco, D. D. (2025) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2025.105214 · Cited by 3
Buning, T. D. C. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-11381-9_17 · Cited by 3
Open risk assessment: methods and expertise
Verloo, D., Meyvis, T., & Smith, A. (2016) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2016.s0505 · Cited by 3
Disaster Management, Disaster Governance, and Disaster Citizenship
Lee, Y. (2014) · 경제와사회 · doi:10.18207/criso.2014..104.56 · Cited by 3
What Is Science? (And Why Does This Matter?)
Halffman, W. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316162514.003 · Cited by 3
Introduction – The Contributions of Big Data
Tassi, P. (2019) · Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics · doi:10.24187/ecostat.2018.505d.1963 · Cited by 3
Involving stakeholders in the risk regulation process: the example of ANSES
Luneau, A., & Fourniau, J.-M. (2019) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2019.1687573 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Jasanoff, S.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jasanoff, Sheila
- ORCID
- Jasanoff, Sheila
- Venue
- Minerva
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 223-244
- ISSN
- 0026-4695 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1871
- OpenAlex
- W4240413791
- Cited by
- 1,004
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 77 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 38
- FWCI
- 13.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Minerva (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Research, Science, and Academia
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Social Science and Policy Research
- Keywords
- citizen participation, science in society, uncertainty analysis, expert decision-making, technology governance, framing, vulnerability, distribution, learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review