The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Science and Technology Studies scholar Sheila Jasanoff discusses the fabricated and performative nature of 'human pretensions of control over technological systems'. 44”
From Proceduralizing control and discretion: Human oversight in artificial intelligence policy (2020) · cites this paper as [44]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,001
Jæger, K. (2018) · Higher Education Policy · doi:10.1057/s41307-018-00126-w · Cited by 17
Repairing the Broken Earth: N.K. Jemisin on race and environment in transitions
Iles, A. (2019) · Elementa Science of the Anthropocene · doi:10.1525/elementa.364 · Cited by 17
Nikkels, M. J., Kumar, S., & Meinke, H. (2019) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2019.09.001 · Cited by 17
Hidalgo, E. S., & Morell, M. F. (2019) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-019-0364-0 · Cited by 32
Increasing Engagement in Regulatory Science: Reflections from the Field of Risk Assessment
Dendler, L., & Böl, G. (2020) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243920944499 · Cited by 19
Duke, S. A. (2022) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-022-09627-0 · Cited by 17
Mejlgaard, N., & Stares, S. (2012) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662512446560 · Cited by 17
A failed platform: The Citizen Consensus Conference travels to Chile
Ureta, S. (2015) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662514561940 · Cited by 17
Review: Beyond participation: Opening up political theory in STS
Moore, A. (2010) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312710383070 · Cited by 17
Ayllón, L. M. S., Jenkins, K. E. H., & Kerr, S. (2025) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2025.103998 · Cited by 16
Campbell, P. (2021) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113880 · Cited by 16
Limits and benefits of participatory agenda setting for research and innovation
Gudowsky, N. (2021) · European Journal of Futures Research · doi:10.1186/s40309-021-00177-0 · Cited by 16
Addressing climate services in SouthAmerican Chaco region through a knowledge coproduction process
Hernández, V. A., Riglos, M. F. F., & Vera, C. S. (2021) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102443 · Cited by 16
König, A. (2015) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2015.08.006 · Cited by 16
Models and visions of science-policy interaction: Remarks from a Delphi study in Italy
Valente, A., Castellani, T., Larsen, M., & Aro, A. R. (2014) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/scu039 · Cited by 16
Ethical Reflection Must Always be Measured
Braun, K., Herrmann, S. L., Könninger, S., & Moore, A. (2010) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243909357917 · Cited by 16
Bhaduri, S., & Sharma, A. (2012) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662512452231 · Cited by 16
Vidal, F. (2018) · Science in Context · doi:10.1017/s026988971800008x · Cited by 16
Chepkwony, R. K. T., van Bommel, S., & van Langevelde, F. (2018) · NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.njas.2018.07.007 · Cited by 20
Mission Impossible? Socio-Technical Integration of Nuclear Waste Geological Disposal Systems
Diaz-Maurin, F., & Ewing, R. C. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10124390 · Cited by 16
Social justice, fairness and exclusion in the South Korean electricity sector
Kim, J. D.-Y., Choi, E., & Lee, E. (2019) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.12.002 · Cited by 16
Experiential Learning Processes Informing Climate Change Decision Support
Kalafatis, S. E., Neosh, J., Libarkin, J. C., Whyte, K. P., & Caldwell, C. (2019) · Weather Climate and Society · doi:10.1175/wcas-d-19-0002.1 · Cited by 16
Pereira, A. N. M., & Ribeiro, F. D. M. (2021) · Waste Management & Research The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy · doi:10.1177/0734242x211048128 · Cited by 16
From Knowledge to Action? Re-embedding Science Learning Within the Planet’s Web
Colucci‐Gray, L., & Camino, E. (2014) · Cultural studies of science education · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4360-1_9 · Cited by 17
Kim, J. (2014) · East Asian Science Technology and Society An International Journal · doi:10.1215/18752160-2650927 · Cited by 17
Support for the Development of Technological Innovations: Promoting Responsible Social Uses
Legault, G. A., Verchère, C., & Patenaude, J. (2017) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-017-9911-5 · Cited by 18
Saito, H. (2020) · Science, Technology and Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243920905000 · Cited by 11
Riesch, H. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_4 · Cited by 16
The epistemic tensions of nuclear waste siting in a nuclear landscape
Bell, M. Z. (2022) · Environment and Planning E Nature and Space · doi:10.1177/25148486221117947 · Cited by 15
Citizen science in Latin America and the Global South, Part 1
Piña-Romero, J., Reyes-Galindo, L. I., & Vallejo, A. (2022) · Tapuya Latin American Science Technology and Society · doi:10.1080/25729861.2022.2145040 · Cited by 15
How Neurotech Start-Ups Envision Ethical Futures: Demarcation, Deferral, Delegation
Knopf, S., Frahm, N., & Pfotenhauer, S. M. (2023) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-022-00421-1 · Cited by 15
Conceptualising the Link between Citizen Science and Climate Governance: A Systematic Review
Freschi, G., Menegatto, M., & Zamperini, A. (2024) · Climate · doi:10.3390/cli12050060 · Cited by 15
Plenty as a response to austerity? Big Data expertise, cultures and communities
Bassett, C. (2015) · European Journal of Cultural Studies · doi:10.1177/1367549415577394 · Cited by 15
Citizen science at the roots and as the future of forensic genetic genealogy
Granja, R. (2023) · International Journal of Police Science & Management · doi:10.1177/14613557231164901 · Cited by 19
Shelley‐Egan, C., & Davies, S. R. (2013) · Review of Policy Research · doi:10.1111/ropr.12032 · Cited by 15
Looking North and South: Ideals and realities of inclusive environmental governance
Delgado, A. M., & Strand, R. (2009) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.09.008 · Cited by 15
Anthropocentrism and Well‐being: A Way Out of the Lobster Pot?
McIntyre-Mills, J. J. (2012) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/sres.2131 · Cited by 16
Reconstructing the citizen: Disaster, citizenship, and expertise in racial Guyana
Vaughn, S. E. (2012) · Critique of Anthropology · doi:10.1177/0308275x12467718 · Cited by 15
Technical standards in nanotechnology as an instrument of subordinated governance: Mexico case study
Montoya, M. A., & Chauvet, M. (2016) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2016.1196098 · Cited by 15
Nowcasting GDP Growth by Reading Newspapers
Bortoli, C., Combes, S., & Renault, T. (2019) · Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics · doi:10.24187/ecostat.2018.505d.1964 · Cited by 16
Interactive learning and action: realizing the promise of synthetic biology for global health
Betten, A. W., Roelofsen, A., & Broerse, J. E. W. (2013) · Systems and Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1007/s11693-013-9113-7 · Cited by 15
Visioneering and the Role of Active Engagement and Assessment
Trujillo, L. Y. C. (2014) · NanoEthics · doi:10.1007/s11569-014-0199-5 · Cited by 14
The moral economies of natural disasters insurance: solidarity or individual responsibility?
Barry, L. (2023) · Journal of Cultural Economy · doi:10.1080/17530350.2023.2258909 · Cited by 15
Public engagement in biosciences and biotechnologies: Reflections on the role of sociology and STS
Marks, N. J., & Russell, A. W. (2015) · Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1177/1440783314562503 · Cited by 15
What role for social scientists in risk expertise?
Wendling, C. (2012) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2011.636837 · Cited by 14
Hype After Hype: From Bio to Nano to AI
Seifert, F., & Fautz, C. (2021) · NanoEthics · doi:10.1007/s11569-021-00399-3 · Cited by 14
Kovacic, Z., & Benini, L. (2022) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2022.102984 · Cited by 17
Knowledge claims in European Union energy policies: Unknown knowns and uncomfortable awareness
Giampietro, M., & Bukkens, S. G. F. (2022) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2022.102739 · Cited by 17
Bernstein, M. J., Franssen, T., Smith, R., & de Wilde, M. (2022) · AMBIO · doi:10.1007/s13280-022-01802-3 · Cited by 17
Wickson, F. (2009) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669870802533233 · Cited by 14
Li, F., Owen, R., & Simakova, E. (2015) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.1002059 · Cited by 14
It’s about Time: Adaptive Resource Management, Environmental Governance, and Science Studies
Whitney, K. (2018) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243918794035 · Cited by 16
Parotte, C. (2020) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101761 · Cited by 14
Ethics or Politics?:The Emergence of ELSI Discourse in Canada*
López, J. J., & Robertson, A. R. R. (2007) · Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie · doi:10.1111/j.1755-618x.2007.tb01134.x · Cited by 14
Risk and Distributive Justice: The Case of Regulating New Technologies
Ferretti, M. P. (2009) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-009-9172-z · Cited by 14
Heinsch, M., Cootes, H., & Tickner, C. (2023) · Health Sociology Review · doi:10.1080/14461242.2023.2174897 · Cited by 15
Cianci‐Gaskill, J. A., Klug, J. L., Merrell, K., Millar, E., Wain, D., Kramer, L., van Wijk, D., Paule‐Mercado, M. C., Finlay, K. P., Glines, M. R., et al. (2024) · Lake and Reservoir Management · doi:10.1080/10402381.2023.2299868 · Cited by 13
Exploring procedural justice in stakeholder identification using a systematic mapping approach
Lemke, L. K.-G., Beier, J., & Hanger-Kopp, S. (2024) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103900 · Cited by 13
Politics of The Ring: Limits to Public Participation in Engineering Practice
Hillier, J. (2018) · International Journal of Urban and Regional Research · doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12523 · Cited by 13
Framing the uncertainty of risk: Models of governance for genetically modified foods
Clark, L. F. (2013) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/sct001 · Cited by 13
The limits of associative democracy: a comment on an actor-relational approach in planning
Webb, D. A. (2010) · Planning Theory · doi:10.1177/1473095210381566 · Cited by 13
A Participatory Approach to Evaluating Strategies for Forest Carbon Mitigation in British Columbia
St‐Laurent, G. P., Hoberg, G., & Sheppard, S. R. J. (2018) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f9040225 · Cited by 13
Stem Cell-Derived Human Gametes: The Public Engagement Imperative
Adashi, E. Y., Cohen, I. G., Hanna, J. H., Surani, M. A., & Hayashi, K. (2019) · Trends in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2019.01.005 · Cited by 13
Ruggiu, D. (2019) · NanoEthics · doi:10.1007/s11569-019-00337-4 · Cited by 13
Jorm, C. M., Iedema, R. A. M., Piper, D. A., Goodwin, N., & Searles, A. (2021) · Journal of Health Organization and Management · doi:10.1108/jhom-06-2020-0218 · Cited by 12
The role of expectations, hype and ethics in neuroimaging and neuromodulation futures
Rusconi, E., & Mitchener-Nissen, T. (2014) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2014.00214 · Cited by 13
Public Engagement in Science and Technology
Broerse, J. E. W., & de Cock, T. B. (2012) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-373932-2.00017-x · Cited by 13
Proposal for a Critical Neuroscience
Slaby, J., & Choudhury, S. (2011) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781444343359.ch1 · Cited by 15
Simple techniques for a complex problem: Sampling malaria vectors in Africa
Charlwood, J. D., Kampango, A., Omari, M. J., & Okumu, F. O. (2024) · Acta Tropica · doi:10.1016/j.actatropica.2023.107104 · Cited by 12
Integrating Social Scientific Perspectives on the Quantified Employee Self
Calvard, T. (2019) · The social science · doi:10.3390/socsci8090262 · Cited by 9
Science Communication at a Time of Crisis: Emergency, Democracy, and Persuasion
Davies, S. R. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14095103 · Cited by 19
Malpass, A., Breel, A., Stubbs, J., Stevens, T., Maravala, P. J., Shipman, E., Gross, Z. B., & Farr, M. (2023) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-023-00512-8 · Cited by 12
Brunet, L., & Müller, R. (2023) · Minerva · doi:10.1007/s11024-023-09518-8 · Cited by 12
Schulte, I., Yowargana, P., Nielsen, J. Ø., Kraxner, F., & Fuss, S. (2022) · Global Sustainability · doi:10.1017/sus.2023.26 · Cited by 18
Science communication in a diverse world
Lewenstein, B. V. (2024) · Journal of Science Communication · doi:10.22323/2.23050401 · Cited by 12
Nawaz, S., & Belotti, G. (2025) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2025.104080 · Cited by 12
Yang, R., Horstman, K., & Penders, B. (2020) · Journal of Chinese Governance · doi:10.1080/23812346.2020.1796160 · Cited by 12
Klintman, M., Jönsson, A., Grafström, M., & Torgilsson, P. (2022) · Environment Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-022-02564-4 · Cited by 14
Heltzel, A., Schuijer, J. W., Willems, W., Kupper, F., & Broerse, J. E. W. (2022) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2022.2040779 · Cited by 12
Citizen Science in News Media: Boundary Mediation of Public Participation in Health Expertise
Mayes, E. (2023) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/01622439221112458 · Cited by 12
Translating tools and indicators in territorial RRI
Völker, T., Mazzonetto, M., Slaattelid, R. T., & Strand, R. (2023) · Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics · doi:10.3389/frma.2022.1038970 · Cited by 12
Understanding stakeholder experiences with visual communication in environmental impact assessment
de Oliveira, A. R., Bento, S., Partidärio, M. R., & Morrison‐Saunders, A. (2023) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107210 · Cited by 12
Leith, P., & Vanclay, F. M. (2015) · Sociologia Ruralis · doi:10.1111/soru.12124 · Cited by 12
Leino, H., Karppi, I., & Jokinen, A. (2015) · Planning Theory · doi:10.1177/1473095215617985 · Cited by 12
Barnett, A. J., & Wiber, M. G. (2018) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243918781269 · Cited by 15
Challenges and opportunities from a paradigm shift in groundwater governance
Simpson, H. C., & de Loë, R. C. (2019) · Hydrogeology Journal · doi:10.1007/s10040-019-02064-2 · Cited by 12
Public Trust, Deliberative Engagement and Health Data Projects: Beyond Legal Provisions
Bharti, N., O’Donovan, C., Smallman, M., & Wilson, J. (2021) · Engaging Science Technology and Society · doi:10.17351/ests2021.1197 · Cited by 12
Enabling Sustainable Production-Consumption Systems
Lebel, L., & Lorek, S. (2008) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.33.022007.145734 · Cited by 12
Reynolds, J. L., Kennedy, E. B., & Symons, J. (2022) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2022.2129543 · Cited by 11
Limiting open science? Three approaches to bottom-up governance of dual-use research of concern
Yoshizawa, G., Shinomiya, N., Kawamoto, S., Kawahara, N., Kiga, D., Hanaki, K., & Minari, J. (2023) · Pathogens and Global Health · doi:10.1080/20477724.2023.2265626 · Cited by 11
Competing Agendas in Upstream Engagement Meetings Between Celiac Disease Experts and Patients
Veen, M., Molder, H. T., Gremmen, B., & van Woerkum, C. (2011) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547011427975 · Cited by 11
Future value change: Identifying realistic possibilities and risks
Hopster, J. K. G. (2022) · Prometheus · doi:10.13169/prometheus.38.1.0113 · Cited by 12
New Democratic Sciences, Ethics, and Proper Publics
Giordano, S. B. (2017) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243917723078 · Cited by 12
Visualizing Energy Participation: A Method for Practitioners and Researchers
Morales-Guerrero, J., & Karwat, D. M. A. (2020) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101496 · Cited by 11
Baek, P., & Kim, T. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13063237 · Cited by 11
Sawai, T., Hatta, T., Akatsuka, K., & Fujita, M. (2021) · Future Science OA · doi:10.2144/fsoa-2021-0066 · Cited by 11
Rural Solutions for Threats to Urban Areas: The Contest over Calamity Polders
Roth, D., & Warner, J. F. (2009) · Built Environment · doi:10.2148/benv.35.4.545 · Cited by 12
On Being Responsible: Multiplicity in Responsible Development
Davies, S. R., Glerup, C., & Horst, M. (2014) · The International library of ethics, law and technology · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9103-8_9 · Cited by 11
A framework for exploring futures of complex urban energy systems
Basu, S., & Bale, C. S. E. (2023) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2023.1145277 · Cited by 10
Beyond precautionary principle: policy-making under uncertainty and complexity
Wu, X., Ma, L., Low, D., Sharma, S., & Papyshev, G. (2023) · Policy Design and Practice · doi:10.1080/25741292.2023.2229090 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Jasanoff, S.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jasanoff, Sheila
- ORCID
- Jasanoff, Sheila
- Venue
- Minerva
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 223-244
- ISSN
- 0026-4695 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1871
- OpenAlex
- W4240413791
- Cited by
- 1,004
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 77 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 38
- FWCI
- 13.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Minerva (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Research, Science, and Academia
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Social Science and Policy Research
- Keywords
- citizen participation, science in society, uncertainty analysis, expert decision-making, technology governance, framing, vulnerability, distribution, learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review