Cited by 1,004Research, Science, and AcademiaRisk Perception and ManagementSocial Science and Policy Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science

Jasanoff, Sheila·2003·Minerva

DOI 10.1023/a:1025557512320

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1025557512320

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Still being checked.

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 1,001

Nature, Sociology, and Social Justice
Rudy, A. P., & Konefal, J. (2007) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764207307739 · Cited by 10
Guiding the guides: Doing ‘Constructive Innovation Assessment’ as part of innovating forest ecosystem service governance
Aukes, E. J., Stegmaier, P., & Schleyer, C. (2022) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101482 · Cited by 10
Risk discourses and governance of high-level radioactive waste storage in Taiwan
Fan, M. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2017.1418303 · Cited by 10
Constructing global data: Automated techniques in ecological monitoring, precaution and reification of risk
Thayyil, N. (2018) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951718779407 · Cited by 10
No one solution to the “new demarcation problem”?: A view from the trenches
Wagner, W. E. (2022) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2022.02.001 · Cited by 10
(Re)making matter: design and selection
Kearnes, M. (2007) · Area · doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00744.x · Cited by 10
Public Engagement and the Governance of Gain-of-Function Research
Schoch‐Spana, M. (2015) · Health Security · doi:10.1089/hs.2015.0005 · Cited by 10
Deadlock in transition to a net-zero socially robust knowledge
Chou, K.-T., Lin, M.-X., & Walther, D. (2023) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2023.04.022 · Cited by 9
Citizen Data and Trust in Official Statistics
Ruppert, E. S., Grommé, F., Ustek‐Spilda, F., & Cakici, B. (2019) · Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics · doi:10.24187/ecostat.2018.505d.1971 · Cited by 9
Inescapable Frameworks: Ethics of Care, Ethics of Rights and the Responsible Research and Innovation Model
Ruggiu, D. (2019) · Philosophy of Management · doi:10.1007/s40926-019-00119-8 · Cited by 9
‘That would break the containment’: the co-production of responsibility and safety-by-design in xenobiology
Aparicio, A. (2021) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2021.1877479 · Cited by 9
Actors and Audiences: Negotiating Fisheries Management
Boucquey, N. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning · doi:10.1080/1523908x.2015.1116377 · Cited by 9
“We Can Help the People Who Can Make a Difference”: Motivations, Goals, and Outcomes in Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring
McCauley, J. (2016) · Sociological Focus · doi:10.1080/00380237.2017.1251748 · Cited by 9
Futures of new post-truth: new research frontiers on disturbingly fascinating pathologies affecting information dissemination and knowledge production
Ahen, F. (2019) · foresight · doi:10.1108/fs-10-2018-0088 · Cited by 11
Together Alone: Going Online during COVID-19 Is Changing Scientific Conferences
Bray, H. J., Stone, J., Litchfield, L., Britt, K. L., Hopper, J. L., & Ingman, W. V. (2022) · Challenges · doi:10.3390/challe13010007 · Cited by 9
Does “Precision” Matter? A Q Study of Public Interpretations of Gene Editing in Agriculture
Nawaz, S., Satterfield, T., & Phurisamban, R. (2022) · Science, Technology, & Human Values · doi:10.1177/01622439221112460 · Cited by 9
Creating a developmental framework for evaluating RRI implementation in research organisations
Schmidt, E. K. (2023) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102350 · Cited by 9
Reflecting on the Science in Science Communication
Bronson, K. (2014) · Canadian Journal of Communication · doi:10.22230/cjc.2014v39n4a2751 · Cited by 9
Evaluating Interactive Policy Making on Biotechnology: The Case of the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport
Broerse, J. E. W., Buning, T. D. C., Roelofsen, A., & Bunders, J. (2009) · Bulletin of Science Technology & Society · doi:10.1177/0270467609349595 · Cited by 9
Strong Will in a Messy World. Ethics and the Government of Technoscience
Pellizzoni, L. (2012) · NanoEthics · doi:10.1007/s11569-012-0159-x · Cited by 9
Conflicting Futures
Kokotovich, A. E., & Kuzma, J. (2014) · Bulletin of Science Technology & Society · doi:10.1177/0270467614565695 · Cited by 9
Contemporary Scientists Discuss the Need for Openness and Open-Mindedness in Science and Society
Mulhall, P. J., Smith, D., Hart, C., & Gunstone, R. (2016) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-016-9554-6 · Cited by 9
Regional-scale brine migration along vertical pathways due to CO 2 injection – Part 1: The participatory modeling approach
Scheer, D., Konrad, W., Class, H., Kissinger, A., Knopf, S., & Noack, V. (2017) · Hydrology and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-21-2739-2017 · Cited by 9
Anticipatory Policy as a Design Challenge: Experiments with Stakeholders Engagement in Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technologies (BDLTs)
Kera, D. (2019) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-23813-1_11 · Cited by 9
Anthropocenic Limitations to Climate Engineering
Oomen, J. (2019) · Humanities · doi:10.3390/h8040186 · Cited by 9
Rediscovering a risky ideology: technocracy and its effects on technology governance
Sadowski, J. (2020) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2020.1816345 · Cited by 9
Misconceptions Still Drive Citizens’ Scepticism Towards Biotechnologically Produced Food
Spreen, N., & Klimmt, C. (2024) · Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society · doi:10.1177/02704676241258060 · Cited by 8
The limits of co-production: linking regulatory capacity to co-production of authoritative knowledge for environmental policy
Large, D. (2024) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/scae038 · Cited by 8
Deciphering a Meal through Open Source Standards
Dolejšová, M. (2016) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/2851581.2892586 · Cited by 8
Risco, catástrofes e a questão das vítimas
Mendes, J. M., & Araújo, P. (2016) · e-cadernos CES · doi:10.4000/eces.2029 · Cited by 8
Empires built on sand: On the fundamental implausibility of reactor safety assessments and the implications for nuclear regulation
Downer, J., & Ramana, M. (2020) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.12300 · Cited by 5
Undermining Neo-liberal Orthodoxies in School Science: Telling the Story of Aluminium
Levinson, R. (2014) · Cultural studies of science education · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4360-1_21 · Cited by 8
From Anti-Pollution to Climate Change Risk Movement: Reshaping Civic Epistemology
Chou, K.-T. (2015) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su71114574 · Cited by 8
Involving stakeholders in policymaking: tensions emerging from a public dialogue with knowledge-based entrepreneurs
Dutrénit, G., & Suárez, M. (2017) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/scx043 · Cited by 8
Genetically Engineered Animals, Drugs, and Neoliberalism: The Need for a New Biotechnology Regulatory Policy Framework
Meghani, Z. (2017) · Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10806-017-9696-1 · Cited by 8
Situating Expertise: Lessons from the HIV/AIDS Epidemic
Paremoer, L. (2018) · Global Challenges · doi:10.1002/gch2.201700076 · Cited by 7
Materials sovereignty: Pathways for shaping nanotechnology design
Kokai, A., & Iles, A. (2020) · Elementa Science of the Anthropocene · doi:10.1525/elementa.410 · Cited by 8
Public Engagement Practices in EC-Funded RRI Projects: Fostering Socio-Scientific Collaborations
Michali, M., & Eleftherakis, G. (2022) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci12030104 · Cited by 9
Aiming at the good life in the datafied world: A co-productionist framework of ethics
Boenig-Liptsin, M. (2022) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517221139782 · Cited by 9
The Value of Science and Technology Studies (STS) to Sustainability Research: A Critical Approach Toward Synthetic Biology Promises
Pauwels, E. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19202-9_9 · Cited by 8
Benefit or Burden? Environmental Justice and Community-Scale Biomass Energy Systems in Vermont
Mittlefehldt, S., & Tedford, C. (2014) · Environmental Justice · doi:10.1089/env.2014.0019 · Cited by 8
Different roles of electromagnetic field experts when giving policy advice: an expert consultation
Spruijt, P., Knol, A. B., Petersen, A. C., & Lebret, E. (2015) · Environmental Health · doi:10.1186/1476-069x-14-7 · Cited by 8
Defining Stem Cells? Scientists and Their Classifications of Nature
Marks, N. J. (2010) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-954x.2010.01910.x · Cited by 8
Virtually Expert: Modes of Environmental Computer Simulation Modeling
Landström, C., & Whatmore, S. J. (2014) · Science in Context · doi:10.1017/s0269889714000210 · Cited by 8
Science’s disparate responsibilities: Patterns across European countries
Mejlgaard, N. (2017) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662517724645 · Cited by 12
Mosaic glimpses: Serious games, generous constraints, and sustainable futures in Kandal, Cambodia
Venot, J., Jensen, C. B., Delay, É., & Daré, W. (2022) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105779 · Cited by 8
The Landscape of Public Participation on Biotechnology
Einsiedel, E. F. (2012) · Acatech-Diskussion · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33994-3_13 · Cited by 8
Compatibility of the SAFE FOODS Risk Analysis Framework with the legal and institutional settings of the EU and the WTO
König, A. (2009) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.11.018 · Cited by 8
Taking value conflicts seriously: Technological pluralism as an approach to hydrogen governance
Popa, E. O., & Melnyk, A. (2025) · Energy Strategy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.esr.2025.101734 · Cited by 7
An Epistemic Governance of European Education
Normand, R. (2016) · Educational governance research · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31776-2_2 · Cited by 7
“What Was That Word? It’s Part of Ensuring Its Future Existence” Exploring Engagement Collectives at the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre
Völker, T., & Pereira, Â. G. (2021) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/01622439211046049 · Cited by 7
Understanding people
Patel, M. (2019) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170716 · Cited by 7
Flipping the Power Dynamics in Measurement and Evaluation: International Aid and the Potential for a Grounded Accountability Model
Urwin, E., Botoeva, A., Arias, R., Vargas, O., & Firchow, P. (2023) · Negotiation Journal · doi:10.1111/nejo.12448 · Cited by 7
Beyond the security paradox: Ten criteria for a socially informed security policy
Pavone, V., Ball, K. S., Esposti, S. D., Dibb, S., & Gomez, E. (2017) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662517702321 · Cited by 7
Doing advisory work: the role of expert advisers in national reviews of teacher education
Hulme, M., Beauchamp, G., & Clarke, L. (2019) · Journal of Further and Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0309877x.2019.1580687 · Cited by 7
Nowcasting and the Use of Big Data in Short-Term Macroeconomic Forecasting: A Critical Review
Richardson, P. (2019) · Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics · doi:10.24187/ecostat.2018.505d.1966 · Cited by 7
Trans-science as a vocation
Eyal, G. (2019) · Journal of Classical Sociology · doi:10.1177/1468795x19851377 · Cited by 7
Responsible Innovation: Moving Towards a Culturally Sensitive Approach
Setiawan, A. D., Singh, R., & Romijn, H. (2019) · Studies in Asian Social Science · doi:10.5430/sass.v6n2p46 · Cited by 20
Private Issues in Public Spaces: Regimes of Engagement at a Citizen Conference
Aceros, J. C., & Domènech, M. (2020) · Minerva · doi:10.1007/s11024-020-09423-4 · Cited by 7
Eliminating Human Agency: Why Does Japan Abandon Predictive Simulations?
Sugawara, S. (2021) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/01622439211051777 · Cited by 7
Community science and the design of climate governance
Barry, L. (2022) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-021-03295-7 · Cited by 7
El Acuerdo de Escazú, la democracia ambiental y la ecologización de los derechos humanos
Roa-García, M. C., & Riaño, D. M. M. (2021) · Naturaleza y Sociedad Desafíos Medioambientales · doi:10.53010/nys1.02 · Cited by 7
How institutional solutions meant to increase diversity in science fail
Koskinen, I. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03959-6 · Cited by 7
Understanding Everyday Travel Experiences and Transportation Infrastructure Challenges of People with Disabilities in Denver, CO
Wagner, M., Shirgaokar, M., & Marshall, W. E. (2023) · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.1177/03611981231174400 · Cited by 7
Resonanz der Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft
Weingart, P. (2010) · VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-531-92425-0_6 · Cited by 7
Using the Lens of “Social Construction of Technology” to Understand the Design and Implementation of Aadhaar (UID) Project
Sivamalai, L. (2013) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-38862-0_45 · Cited by 7
Expert involvement in science development: (re-)evaluation of an early screening tool for carbon storage site characterization
Scheer, D., Konrad, W., Class, H., Kissinger, A., Knopf, S., & Noack, V. (2015) · International journal of greenhouse gas control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.03.023 · Cited by 7
Participatory Approaches in Science and Technology
Lengwiler, M. (2009) · Museums & Social Issues · doi:10.1179/msi.2009.4.1.67 · Cited by 7
Processos de governação da ciência: O debate em torno do modelo de financiamento das unidades de investigação em Portugal
Pereira, T. S. (2004) · Revista crítica de ciências sociais/Revista crítica de ciências sociais · doi:10.4000/rccs.1044 · Cited by 7
New Technological Interventions in Conservation Conflicts: Countering Emotions and Contested Knowledge
Verma, A., van der Wal, R., & Fischer, A. (2017) · Human Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10745-017-9936-z · Cited by 8
NOT ALL GLITTERS IN THE BLACK GOLD: UNCERTAINTIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL THREATS OF THE BRAZILIAN PRE-SALT
Viglio, J. E., Giulio, G. M. D., & Ferreira, L. D. C. (2017) · Ambiente & sociedade · doi:10.1590/1809-4422asoc58r3v2032017 · Cited by 8
The contract between science and society: A South African case study
Kahn, M. (2018) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/scy042 · Cited by 7
Ethics to Intersect Civic Participation and Formal Guidance
Bohle, M., Nauen, C. E., & Marone, E. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11030773 · Cited by 10
The Politics of Participatory Sustainability Assessments: An Analysis of Power
Fritz, L., & Meinherz, F. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108574334.006 · Cited by 7
Making differences legible: Incommensurability as a vehicle for sustainable landscape management
Allain, S., & Salliou, N. (2021) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107240 · Cited by 7
“How are you vulnerable?”: Using participation for vulnerability analysis in emergency planning
Rossignol, N., Turcanu, C., Fallon, C., & Zwetkoff, C. (2014) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2014.961522 · Cited by 7
Equitable technology development: A framework and methods for scientists and engineers
Ensor, J., Johnson, S., Vorbach, D., & MOIR, J. W. B. (2025) · Sustainable Futures · doi:10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100451 · Cited by 6
New Organs on Command: The Regulatory Prospects of 3D Bioprinting Technology in the European Union
Đuković, M. (2025) · Law Technology and Humans · doi:10.5204/lthj.3817 · Cited by 6
Innovation systems and co-evolutionary development: A systematic literature review
Satalkina, L., & Steiner, G. (2025) · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2025.100808 · Cited by 7
‘It's like these scientists own the rains’: indigenous knowledge, disaster warnings, and the politics of legitimacy in Malawi
Kita, S. M. (2025) · Disasters. The Journal of Disaster Studies, Policy and Management · doi:10.1111/disa.70028 · Cited by 6
Narrative, Nanotechnology and the Accomplishment of Public Responses: a Response to Thorstensen
Kearnes, M., Macnaghten, P., & Davies, S. R. (2014) · NanoEthics · doi:10.1007/s11569-014-0209-7 · Cited by 6
Public Involvement and Narrative Fallacies of Nanotechnologies
Thorstensen, E. (2014) · NanoEthics · doi:10.1007/s11569-014-0202-1 · Cited by 6
‘Nexus’ Narratives in Urban Vulnerable Places: Pathways to Sustainability via Municipal Health Programs in Brazil
Urbinatti, A. M., Honda, S. L. O., de Carvalho, C. M., Frey, K., Jacobi, P. R., & Giatti, L. L. (2023) · World · doi:10.3390/world4010002 · Cited by 6
STEM CELLS, SCIENCE, AND PUBLIC REASONING
Hurlbut, J. B., & Robert, J. S. (2012) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.1002/pam.21611 · Cited by 6
The Wickedness and Complexity of Decision Making in Geoengineering
Zhang, Y., & Posch, A. (2014) · Challenges · doi:10.3390/challe5020390 · Cited by 6
Models of Science Policy: From the Linear Model to Responsible Research and Innovation
Macnaghten, P. (2022) · Studies in history and philosophy of science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-91597-1_5 · Cited by 6
Sociologiska perspektiv på coronakrisen
Danielsson, E., Liljeros, F., Mulinari, S., Soneryd, L., & Forskning, S. (2020) · Sociologisk Forskning · doi:10.37062/sf.57.21539 · Cited by 6
Drawing Lines in the Sand? Paths Forward for Triggering Regulation of Gene-Edited Crops
Nawaz, S., & Kandlikar, M. (2021) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/scab014 · Cited by 6
Goodbye Expert-Based Policy Advice? Challenges in Advising Governmental Institutions in Times of Transformation
Kehl, C., Albrecht, S., Riousset, P., & Sauter, A. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132313442 · Cited by 6
The Problem of Trust Without Intimacy: Education for Handling Expert Knowledge in a Neoliberal Marketplace
Smith, D. (2022) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-022-00329-z · Cited by 6
Wissenschaftskommunikation als kommunikative Figuration. Ein konzeptioneller Rahmen für die empirische Untersuchung von Domänen der Wissenschaftskommunikation
Broer, I., & Hasebrink, U. (2022) · Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft · doi:10.5771/1615-634x-2022-3-234 · Cited by 6
Mistrust: Community engagement in global health research in coastal Kenya
Sariola, S. (2023) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/03063127231162082 · Cited by 6
Reasoning by analogy and the transdisciplinarian’s circle: on the problem of knowledge transfer across cases in transdisciplinary research
Eigi, J., & Koskinen, I. (2023) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-023-01315-2 · Cited by 6
Safe and purposeful genome editing under harmonized regulation for responsible use: views of research experts
Ramos, P. D., Almeida, M. S., & Olsson, I. A. S. (2023) · New Genetics and Society · doi:10.1080/14636778.2023.2237177 · Cited by 6
Supporting Activism in Latin America: The Role of Science Communication, Science Journalism, and NGOs in Socio-environmental Conflicts
de Oliveira, D. L., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2023) · Journalism Studies · doi:10.1080/1461670x.2023.2241076 · Cited by 6
The emergence of ethical issues in artificial intelligence software experiments
Gaglio, G., Loute, A., & Domingues‐Montanari, S. (2023) · Réseaux · doi:10.3917/res.240.0145 · Cited by 6
Landscape Urbanism—Retrospective on Development, Basic Principles and Application
Balon, N., Hrdalo, I., Mrđa, A., Kamenečki, M., Reljić, D. T., & Pereković, P. (2023) · Architecture · doi:10.3390/architecture3040040 · Cited by 6
Anticipation and its degrees of critical-reflective radicality: opening up the affordances of engaging with futures to problematize STI
López, S. U. (2024) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2023.2294537 · Cited by 6
Conceptualizing participation: Defining and analyzing public participation in policymaking processes
Schwartz, M., & Schejter, A. M. (2024) · Telecommunications Policy · doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2024.102796 · Cited by 6
Voting for stem cells: How local conditions tempered moral opposition to Proposition 71
Dragojlovic, N. (2013) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/sct066 · Cited by 6

Authors: Jasanoff, S.
Affiliations: Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author: Jasanoff, Sheila
ORCID: Jasanoff, Sheila
Venue: Minerva
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 2003-09
Volume: 41
Issue: 3
Pages: 223-244
ISSN: 0026-4695 (ISSN-L)
1573-1871
DOI: 10.1023/a:1025557512320
OpenAlex: W4240413791
Cited by: 1,004
References: 0
Citations by year: 2026: 77 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 38
FWCI: 13.71
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining (tdm)
www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining (vor)
Locations: Minerva (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Research, Science, and Academia
Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Social Science and Policy Research
Keywords: citizen participation, science in society, uncertainty analysis, expert decision-making, technology governance, framing, vulnerability, distribution, learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks