Cited by 3,596Anomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Statistical Methods and ModelsImage and Object Detection Techniques

A Survey of Outlier Detection Methodologies

Open access
Hodge, Victoria, Austin, Jim·2004·Artificial Intelligence Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:aire.0000045502.10941.a9

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hodge, V., & Austin, J.
Affiliations
University of York (GB)
Corresponding author
Austin, Jim
Venue
Artificial Intelligence Review
Published
2004-10
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
85-126
ISSN
  • 0269-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7462
OpenAlex
W2137130182
Cited by
3,596
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 95 · 2025: 191 · 2024: 193 · 2023: 197 · 2022: 223 · 2021: 287 · 2020: 316 · 2019: 283 · 2018: 251 · 2017: 219 · 2016: 223 · 2015: 196 · 2014: 186 · 2013: 156 · 2012: 138
FWCI
25.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Artificial Intelligence Review (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Object Detection Techniques
Keywords
outlier detection, anomaly detection, data cleaning, fraud detection, contaminated data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review