Implicit Attitudes towards Homosexuality: Reliability, Validity, and Controllability of the IAT

Abstract

Abstract. Two experiments were conducted to investigate the psychometric properties of an Implicit Association Test (IAT; Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998 ) that was adapted to measure implicit attitudes towards homosexuality. In a first experiment, the validity of the Homosexuality-IAT was tested using a known group approach. Implicit and explicit attitudes were assessed in heterosexual and homosexual men and women (N = 101). The results provided compelling evidence for the convergent and discriminant validity of the Homosexuality-IAT as a measure of implicit attitudes. No evidence was found for two alternative explanations of IAT effects (familiarity with stimulus material and stereotype knowledge). The internal consistency of IAT scores was satisfactory (αs > .80), but retest correlations were lower. In a second experiment (N = 79) it was shown that uninformed participants were able to fake positive explicit but not implicit attitudes. Discrepancies between implicit and explicit attitudes towards homosexuality could be partially accounted for by individual differences in the motivation to control prejudiced behavior, thus providing independent evidence for the validity of the implicit attitude measure. Neither explicit nor implicit attitudes could be changed by persuasive messages. The results of both experiments are interpreted as evidence for a single construct account of implicit and explicit attitudes towards homosexuality.

Cites (23)

1. Journal of personality and social psychology
   Armstrong, J.Scott · 1988 · International Journal of Forecasting
2. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test
   Greenwald, Anthony G., McGhee, Debbie E., Schwartz, Jordan L. K. · 1998 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
3. Untitled work
   1999
4. Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components
   Devine, Patricia G. · 1989 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
5. A model of dual attitudes.
   Wilson, Timothy D., Lindsey, Samuel, Schooler, Tonya Y. · 2000 · Psychological Review
6. Multiple Processes by which Attitudes Guide Behavior: The Mode Model as an Integrative Framework
   Fazio, Russell H. · 1990 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
7. Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline?
   Fazio, Russell H., Jackson, Joni R., Dunton, Bridget C., Williams, Carol J. · 1995 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
8. On the Nature of Prejudice: Automatic and Controlled Processes
   Dovidio, John F., Kawakami, Kerry, Johnson, Craig, Johnson, Brenda, Howard, Adaiah · 1997 · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
9. Psychological Science
   Boneau, C. Alan · 2010 · The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology
10. Heterosexuals' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: Correlates and gender differences
    Herek, Gregory M. · 1988 · Journal of Sex Research

Show all 23 references

Cited by (34)

1. Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm.
   Greenwald, Anthony G., Nosek, Brian A., Banaji, Mahzarin R. · 2003 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
2. Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity.
   Greenwald, Anthony G., Poehlman, T. Andrew, Uhlmann, Eric Luis, Banaji, Mahzarin R. · 2009 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
3. Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change.
   Gawronski, Bertram, Bodenhausen, Galen V. · 2006 · Psychological Bulletin
4. Untitled work
   2003 · 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225
5. A meta-analysis on the correlation between the implicit association test and explicit self-report measures
   Hofmann, Wilhelm, Gawronski, Bertram, Gschwendner, Tobias, Le, Huy, Schmitt, Manfred · 2005 · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

See all 465