Standards for Internet-Based Experimenting
Abstract
This article summarizes expertise gleaned from the first years of Internet-based experimental research and presents recommendations on: (1) ideal circumstances for conducting a study on the Internet; (2) what precautions have to be undertaken in Web experimental design; (3) which techniques have proven useful in Web experimenting; (4) which frequent errors and misconceptions need to be avoided; and (5) what should be reported. Procedures and solutions for typical challenges in Web experimenting are discussed. Topics covered include randomization, recruitment of samples, generalizability, dropout, experimental control, identity checks, multiple submissions, configuration errors, control of motivational confounding, and pre-testing. Several techniques are explained, including “warm-up,” “high hurdle,” password methods, “multiple site entry,” randomization, and the use of incentives. The article concludes by proposing sixteen standards for Internet-based experimenting.
Cites (35)
- On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications.Orne, Martin T. · 1962 · American Psychologist
- Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymityJoinson, Adam N. · 2001 · European Journal of Social Psychology
- Can You See the Real Me? Activation and Expression of the “True Self” on the InternetBargh, John A., McKenna, Katelyn Y. A., Fitzsimons, Grainne M. · 2002 · Journal of Social Issues
- Experimenter Effects in Behavioral Research.Titchener, James L. · 1967 · Archives of Internal Medicine
- World-Wide Web survey research: Benefits, potential problems, and solutionsSchmidt, William C. · 1997 · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers
- Response Effects in the Electronic SurveyKiesler, Sara, Sproull, Lee S. · 1986 · Public Opinion Quarterly
- Social Influence in Computer-Mediated Communication: The Effects of Anonymity on Group BehaviorPostmes, Tom, Spears, Russell, Sakhel, Khaled, de Groot, Daphne · 2001 · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- The Web Experiment MethodReips, Ulf-Dietrich · 2000 · Psychological Experiments on the Internet
- Social Science Computer Review1987 · Social Science Microcomputer Review
- Validity of Web-Based Psychological ResearchKrantz, John H., Dalal, Reeshad · 2000 · Psychological Experiments on the Internet
Cited by (37)
- Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical TurkMason, Winter, Suri, Siddharth · 2012 · Behavior Research Methods
- Evaluating amazon’s mechanical turk as a tool for experimental behavioral researchCrump, Matthew J. C., McDonnell, John V., Gureckis, Todd M. · 2013 · PLoS ONE
- The world of emotions is not two-dimensionalFontaine, Johnny R.J., Scherer, Klaus R., Roesch, Etienne B., Ellsworth, Phoebe C. · 2007 · Psychological Science
- Conducting Clinical Research Using Crowdsourced Convenience SamplesChandler, Jesse, Shapiro, Danielle · 2016 · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
- The viability of crowdsourcing for survey researchBehrend, Tara S., Sharek, David J., Meade, Adam W., Wiebe, Eric N. · 2011 · Behavior Research Methods
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Standards for Internet-Based Experimenting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1026//1618-3169.49.4.243
- The paper
- Reips, U.-D. (2002). Standards for Internet-Based Experimenting. Experimental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1026//1618-3169.49.4.243
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.