Cited by 115Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Suicidality in Autistic Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review

Open access

Abstract

Abstract. Background: It is suggested that people with autistic spectrum disorders (ASD) may be at increased risk of suicide; however, research on this topic has been minimal and there are conflicting reports in existing studies. Aim: To bring together research investigating the prevalence, risk factors, and comorbid factors of suicidality in ASD. Method: A systematic search was performed of Medline, Psych Info, Embase, and the Web of Science following PRISMA guidelines. After exclusion criteria were applied, 70 full-text articles were screened. The final review contained 12 papers with a total sample size of 2,651. Results: Prevalence of suicide attempts varied between 7% and 47%, while suicidal ideation was reported in up to 72% of cases. Being male and having a history of self-harm and depression were cited as significant risk factors. Limitations: Papers were cross sectional and contained a number of limitations. Only one paper used the gold standard for diagnosis of ASD and one a standardized measure of suicidal behavior. Conclusion: Suicidal attempts and ideation are increased in ASD; however, the extent of the increase and the risk factors identified within this group remain under-investigated. There is a lack of research on protective factors. The correlation between ASD and suicidality needs further examination with longitudinal research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1027/0227-5910/a000458

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.2174/1745017901107010097 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zahid, S., & Upthegrove, R.
Affiliations
University of Birmingham (GB)
Venue
Crisis
Published
2017-07
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
237-246
ISSN
  • 0227-5910 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-2396
OpenAlex
W2610605440
Cited by
115
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Crisis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
suicidality, autism spectrum disorder, suicide attempts, suicidal ideation, risk factors, self-harm, depression, prevalence, comorbidities, protective factors
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Risk Factors, Suicide, Suicide, Attempted, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review