Cited by 176Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Systematic Review of Suicide in Autism Spectrum Disorder: Current Trends and Implications

Hedley, Darren, Uljarević, Mirko·2018·Current Developmental Disorders Reports

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40474-018-0133-6

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hedley, D., & Uljarević, M.
Affiliations
La Trobe University (AU)
Corresponding author
Hedley, Darren
Venue
Current Developmental Disorders Reports
Published
2018-01-18
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
65-76
ISSN
2196-2987 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2788605551
Cited by
176
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Developmental Disorders Reports (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Cooperative Research Centre for Living with Autism
  • DXC Technology
  • Australian Government Department of Human Services
  • Department of Defence, Australian Government
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, suicide, suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, suicide risk, premature mortality, prevalence estimates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review