Cited by 15Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFree Will and AgencyNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Altered Response Evaluation: Monitoring of Late Responses After Administration of D-Amphetamine

de Bruijn, Ellen R.A., Hulstijn, Wouter, Verkes, Robbert J., Ruigt, Gé S.F., Sabbe, Bernard G.C.·2005·Journal of Psychophysiology

Abstract

Abstract: Recently, D-amphetamine was shown to increase the error negativity, the so-called “response Ne/ERN,” after incorrect choices of hand. We investigated whether this stimulation of action monitoring would also be present in the monitoring of late responses, reflected in the “late Ne/ERN.” Twelve healthy volunteers performed a speeded choice-reaction task on two separate occasions on which either D-amphetamine or a placebo was administered. The results showed a clear late Ne/ERN following too late (TL) responses, but the amplitude of this late Ne/ERN was not affected by treatment condition. An error positivity (Pe) was present after the late Ne/ERN in the placebo condition, but not in the amphetamine condition. Also, P2a amplitudes following TL feedback were larger after administration of amphetamine compared to placebo. Questionnaires filled in by participants showed that they overrated their own speed and accuracy after administration of amphetamine. Overall, this suggests that the stimulating aspects of amphetamine lead to changes in affective and motivational evaluation of errors and performance in general. Therefore, along with the established cognitive contributions, the current results provide evidence for an important role of affective processes in action monitoring and the effects they have on accompanying ERP components.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1027/0269-8803.19.4.311

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Bruijn, E. R. A., Hulstijn, W., Verkes, R. J., Ruigt, G. S. F., & Sabbe, B. G. C.
Affiliations
  • Nijmegen Institute for Cognition and Information (NICI), Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Organon (Netherlands) (NL)
Venue
Journal of Psychophysiology
Published
2005-01
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
311-318
ISSN
  • 0269-8803 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-2124
OpenAlex
W2114669493
Cited by
15
References
22
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
error-related negativity, error positivity, P2A, d-amphetamine, action monitoring, choice reaction time, self-assessment of performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review