Cited by 27Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Methylphenidate improves diminished error and feedback sensitivity in ADHD: an evoked heart rate analysis

Groen, Yvonne, Mulder, Lambertus J.M., Wijers, Albertus A., Minderaa, Ruud B., Althaus, Monika·2009·Biological Psychology

Abstract

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a developmental disorder that has previously been related to a decreased sensitivity to errors and feedback. Supplementary to the traditional performance measures, this study uses autonomic measures to study this decreased sensitivity in ADHD and the modulating effects of medication. Children with ADHD, on and off Methylphenidate (Mph), and typically developing (TD) children performed a selective attention task with three feedback conditions: reward, punishment and no feedback. Evoked Heart Rate (EHR) responses were computed for correct and error trials. All groups performed more efficiently with performance feedback than without. EHR analyses, however, showed that enhanced EHR decelerations on error trials seen in TD children, were absent in the medication-free ADHD group for all feedback conditions. The Mph-treated ADHD group showed 'normalised' EHR decelerations to errors and error feedback, depending on the feedback condition. This study provides further evidence for a decreased physiological responsiveness to errors and error feedback in children with ADHD and for a modulating effect of Mph.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.05.004

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All groups (controls, ADHD-unmedicated and ADHD-medicated) were more accurate and gave slower responses in the feedback blocks compared with no feedback, and showed similar post-error slowing, while stimulus-locked HR decelerations were greater on error trials than correct trials in controls and medicated-ADHD, but not in unmedicated ADHD.

    “Also, all groups (controls, ADHD-unmedicated and ADHD-medicated) were more accurate and gave slower responses in the feedback blocks compared with no feedback, and show similar post-error slowing, while stimulus-locked HR decelerations were greater on error trials than correct trials in controls and medicated-ADHD, but not in unmedicated ADHD.”
  • The only study investigating error monitoring found signs of hypoactivation of the ANS in ADHD during a task that required participants to report the global or local shape in a global/local array.

    “The only study investigating error monitoring found signs of hypoactivation of the ANS in ADHD during a task that required participants to report the global or local shape in a global/local array, interpreted as reduced sensitivity to error processing (Groen et al., 2009).”
  • Groen et al. (2009) found HR decelerations to errors and in response to feedback after errors in both children with ADHD on MPH and controls, while these decelerations were not present when the ADHD children were unmedicated.

    “Groen et al. (2009) measured the effect of MPH on HR measures during a cognitive task, and found HR decelerations to errors and in response to feedback after errors in both children with ADHD on MPH and controls, while these decelerations were not present when the ADHD children were unmedicated.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Groen, Y., Mulder, L. J. M., Wijers, A. A., Minderaa, R. B., & Althaus, M.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Groen, Yvonne
Venue
Biological Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-09
Volume
82
Issue
1
Pages
45-53
ISSN
0301-0511 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2031797327
Cited by
27
References
52
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, methylphenidate, error sensitivity, feedback sensitivity, reward feedback, selective attention, children, stimulant medication effects
MeSH terms
Central Nervous System Stimulants, Analysis of Variance, Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Electrocardiography, Feedback, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate, Neuropsychological Tests, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review