The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stratospheric temperature trends: Observations and model simulations
Abstract
Trends and variations in global stratospheric temperatures are an integral part of the changes occurring in the Earth's climate system. Data sets for analyzing long‐term (a decade and more) changes in the stratospheric temperatures consist of radiosonde, satellite, lidar, and rocketsonde measurements; meteorological analyses based on radiosonde and/or satellite data; and products based on assimilating observations using a general circulation model. Each of these contain varying degrees of uncertainties that influence the interpretation and significance of trends. We review the long‐term trends from approximately the mid‐1960s to the mid‐1990s period. The stratosphere has, in general, undergone considerable cooling over the past 3 decades. At northern midlatitudes the lower stratosphere (∼16–21 km) cooling over the 1979–1994 period is strikingly coherent among the various data sets with regard to magnitude and statistical significance. A substantial cooling occurs in the polar lower stratosphere during winter‐spring; however, there is a large dynamical variability in the northern polar region. The vertical profile of the annual‐mean stratospheric temperature change in the northern midlatitudes over the 1979–1994 period is robust among the different data sets, with ∼0.75 K/decade cooling in the ∼20‐ to 35‐km region and increasing cooling above (e.g., ∼2.5 K/decade at 50 km). Model investigations into the cause or causes of the observed temperature trends are also reviewed. Simulations based on the known changes in species' concentrations indicate that the depletion of lower stratospheric ozone is the major radiative factor in accounting for the 1979–1990 cooling trend in the global, annual‐mean lower stratosphere (∼0.5 to 0.6 K/decade), with a substantially lesser contribution by the well‐mixed greenhouse gases. Ozone loss is also an important causal factor in the latitude‐month pattern of the lower stratospheric cooling trend. Uncertainties arise due to incomplete knowledge of the vertical profile of ozone loss near the tropopause. In the middle and upper stratosphere, both well‐mixed greenhouse gases and ozone changes contribute in an important manner to the cooling, but model simulations underestimate the observed decadal‐scale trend. While there is a lack of reliable information on water vapor changes over the 1980s decade, satellite measurements in the early to middle 1990s indicate increases in water vapor that could be a significant contributor to the cooling of the global lower stratosphere.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans
Efron, B. (1982) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970319 · Cited by 8,120
Radiative forcing and climate response
Hansen, J., Sato, M., & Ruedy, R. (1997) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/96jd03436 · Cited by 2,241
Radiative forcing of climate by changes in the vertical distribution of ozone
Lacis, A. A., Wuebbles, D. J., & Logan, J. A. (1990) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/jd095id07p09971 · Cited by 556 · cited 1×
“It is noted that some ozone loss has been reported for the 1970s [Lacis et al., 1990] which would have contributed to the small observed cooling during that decade (e.”
BackgroundRadiative forcing and temperature trends from stratospheric ozone changes
de F. Forster, P. M., & Shine, K. P. (1997) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/96jd03510 · Cited by 382
Self-citationMount Agung Eruption Provides Test of a Global Climatic Perturbation
Hansen, J. E., Wang, W.-C., & Lacis, A. A. (1978) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.199.4333.1065 · Cited by 193
Cited by
Eyring, V., Butchart, N., Waugh, D. W., Akiyoshi, H., Austin, J., Bekki, S., Bodeker, G. E., Boville, B. A., Brühl, C., Chipperfield, M. P., et al. (2006) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2006jd007327 · Cited by 429
Manzini, E., Giorgetta, M. A., Esch, M., Kornblueh, L., & Roeckner, E. (2006) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli3826.1 · Cited by 386
Changes in biologically active ultraviolet radiation reaching the Earth’s surface
McKenzie, R. L., Björn, L. O., Bais, A., & Ilyasd, M. (2003) · Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences · doi:10.1039/b211155c · Cited by 350
Arctic ozone loss and climate change
Rex, M., Salawitch, R. J., von der Gathen, P., Harris, N. R. P., Chipperfield, M. P., & Naujokat, B. (2004) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2003gl018844 · Cited by 347
Santer, B. D., Sausen, R., Wigley, T. M. L., Boyle, J. S., AchutaRao, K., Doutriaux, C., Hansen, J. E., Meehl, G. A., Roeckner, E., Ruedy, R., et al. (2003) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2002jd002258 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Ramaswamy, V., Chanin, M. ‐., Angell, J., Barnett, J., Gaffen, D., Gelman, M., Keckhut, P., Koshelkov, Y., Labitzke, K., Lin, J. ‐. R., O'Neill, A., Nash, J., Randel, W., Rood, R., Shine, K., Shiotani, M., & Swinbank, R.
- Venue
- Reviews of Geophysics
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2001-02
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-122
- ISSN
- 0096-1043 (ISSN-L)
- 8755-1209
- 1944-9208
- OpenAlex
- W4211109694
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 14.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stratospheric temperature trends: Observations and model simulations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1999rg000065
- The paper
- Ramaswamy, V., Chanin, M. ‐., Angell, J., Barnett, J., Gaffen, D., Gelman, M., Keckhut, P., Koshelkov, Y., Labitzke, K., Lin, J. ‐. R., O'Neill, A., Nash, J., Randel, W., Rood, R., Shine, K., Shiotani, M., & Swinbank, R. (2001). Stratospheric temperature trends: Observations and model simulations. Reviews of Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999rg000065
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.