Cited by 106Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsAstro and Planetary ScienceOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes

Strong zonal winds from thermal convection in a rotating spherical shell

Open access
Aurnou, Jonathan M., Olson, Peter L.·2001·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

Zonal wind (ZW) generation by thermal convection in rotating spherical shells is studied using numerical calculations. Strong ZW accompany quasi‐geostrophic, high Rayleigh number convection in shells with stress‐free boundaries. In a thin shell (radius ratio 0.75) with stress‐free boundaries, nearly 90% of the total kinetic energy is contained in the ZW at Rayleigh number 10 6 and Taylor number 4.4 × l0 7 . The same parameters in a thicker shell produce weaker convection and weaker ZW. Rigid boundaries reduce the kinetic energy in the ZW to less than 20% of the total. The ZW are eastward (prograde) in the equatorial region and westward at higher latitudes, and are driven by Reynolds stresses associated with the convection. Episodes with strong ZW alternate with episodes of strong convection. Although far from the dynamical regime of Jupiter and Saturn, our results support the interpretation that the prograde equatorial jets on these planets originate from deep convection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2000gl012474

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The absence of momentum injection by eddies might be caused by injection of energy at smaller scales not resolvable by the measurements or might reinforce the idea that the jets are deeply rooted structures driven by internal convection, making them insensitive at tropospheric level to the seasonal cycle.

    “The absence of momentum injection by eddies might be caused by injection of energy at smaller scales not resolvable by the measurements or might reinforce the idea that the jets are in fact deeply rooted structures driven by the internal convection [ Aurnou and Olson, 2001; Kaspi et al. 2009] making them insensitive at tropospheric level to the seasonal cycle”

    From Dynamics of Saturn's polar regions (2015) · cites this paper as Aurnou and Olson, 2001

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Alternating jets on gas giant planets are either shallow, existing above about 10 bars, or deep, extending to tens of thousands of bars.

    “on one hand, the alternating jets on gas giant planets are 'shallow', existing above 10 bars or so [15-17]; on the other hand, zonal jets are 'deep', extending to tens of thousands of bars [18-22].”

    From Deep rotating convection generates the polar hexagon on Saturn (2020) · cites this paper as [20]

    The citation is attached to the deep-jet interpretation, not the separately cited shallow-jet claim. The Abstract supports a deep-convection origin for equatorial jets on Jupiter and Saturn, but says the convection depth is unknown and does not specify tens of thousands of bars. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Christensen, U.R., A numerical model of zonal flow on the ma- jor planets driven by deep convection, Geophys. Res. Lett., in press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aurnou, J. M., & Olson, P. L.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Institution for Science (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2001-07
Volume
28
Issue
13
Pages
2557-2559
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W2091808985
Cited by
106
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NAG510165)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Keywords
zonal wind, thermal convection, rotating spherical shell, high Rayleigh number convection, stress-free boundary conditions, rigid boundary, Reynolds stress, kinetic energy, Jupiter, Saturn, deep convection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review