Cited by 123Astro and Planetary ScienceFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsHigh-pressure geophysics and materials

Zonal flow driven by deep convection in the major planets

Open access
Christensen, Ulrich R.·2001·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

The cause of the fast zonal winds on the large gas planets is disputed. To investigate their possible origin by convection in the planets' molecular hydrogen layer, I study simple numerical models of thermal convection in a rotating sphere at low Ekman numbers for Rayleigh numbers up to 100 times critical. With stress‐free boundaries and high Rayleigh number it is possible to reproduce the observed magnitudes of the zonal and non‐zonal flow components at the surfaces of Jupiter and Saturn. While only three flow bands are found for a thick convecting shell, the number increases to seven for a shell with an inner‐to‐outer radius of 0.6.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2000gl012643

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Alternating jets on gas giant planets are either shallow, existing above about 10 bars, or deep, extending to tens of thousands of bars.

    “on one hand, the alternating jets on gas giant planets are 'shallow', existing above 10 bars or so [15-17]; on the other hand, zonal jets are 'deep', extending to tens of thousands of bars [18-22].”

    From Deep rotating convection generates the polar hexagon on Saturn (2020) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Abstract and Introduction support a deep-convection explanation for alternating zonal jets on Jupiter and Saturn, including models with multiple flow bands. They do not express the jets’ depth in bars or establish that they extend to tens of thousands of bars. The shallow, roughly 10-bar alternative is cited to other sources in the citing sentence, not to this paper. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Christensen, U. R.
Affiliations
University of Göttingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Christensen, Ulrich R.
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2001-07
Volume
28
Issue
13
Pages
2553-2556
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W2004337164
Cited by
123
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
  • GRO (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › High-pressure geophysics and materials
Keywords
zonal flows, deep convection, gas giant planets, Jupiter, Saturn, thermal convection, rotating sphere, Rayleigh number, stress-free boundary conditions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review