The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Empirical studies of cloud effects on UV radiation: A review
Open accessAbstract
The interest in solar ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the scientific community and the general population has risen significantly in recent years because of the link between increased UV levels at the Earth's surface and depletion of ozone in the stratosphere. As a consequence of recent research, UV radiation climatologies have been developed, and effects of some atmospheric constituents (such as ozone or aerosols) have been studied broadly. Correspondingly, there are well‐established relationships between, for example, total ozone column and UV radiation levels at the Earth's surface. Effects of clouds, however, are not so well described, given the intrinsic difficulties in properly describing cloud characteristics. Nevertheless, the effect of clouds cannot be neglected, and the variability that clouds induce on UV radiation is particularly significant when short timescales are involved. In this review we show, summarize, and compare several works that deal with the effect of clouds on UV radiation. Specifically, works reviewed here approach the issue from the empirical point of view: Some relationship between measured UV radiation in cloudy conditions and cloud‐related information is given in each work. Basically, there are two groups of methods: techniques that are based on observations of cloudiness (either from human observers or by using devices such as sky cameras) and techniques that use measurements of broadband solar radiation as a surrogate for cloud observations. Some techniques combine both types of information. Comparison of results from different works is addressed through using the cloud modification factor (CMF) defined as the ratio between measured UV radiation in a cloudy sky and calculated radiation for a cloudless sky. Typical CMF values for overcast skies range from 0.3 to 0.7, depending both on cloud type and characteristics. Despite this large dispersion of values corresponding to the same cloud cover, it is clear that the cloud effect on UV radiation is 15–45% lower than the cloud effect on total solar radiation. The cloud effect is usually a reducing effect, but a significant number of works report an enhancement effect (that is increased UV radiation levels at the surface) due to the presence of clouds. The review concludes with some recommendations for future studies aimed to further analyze the cloud effects on UV radiation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change
Seinfeld, J. H., Pandis, S. N., & Noone, K. (1998) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.882420 · Cited by 8,731
Griggs, D. J., & Noguer, M. (2002) · Weather · doi:10.1256/004316502320517344 · Cited by 5,754
Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from air pollution to climate change
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-5721 · Cited by 4,944
Some Comments on the Evaluation of Model Performance
Willmott, C. J. (1982) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1982)063<1309:scoteo>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 3,736
An Introduction to Solar Radiation
(1983) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-373750-2.x5001-0 · Cited by 3,473
Optical Properties of Aerosols and Clouds: The Software Package OPAC
Hess, M., Koepke, P., & Schult, I. (1998) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<0831:opoaac>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 2,909
An Introduction to Atmospheric Radiation
Liou, K. N., & Bohren, C. F. (1981) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.2914664 · Cited by 1,292
The wavelengths in sunlight effective in producing skin cancer: a theoretical analysis
Setlow, R. B. (1974) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.71.9.3363 · Cited by 1,125
Ozone Depletion: Ultraviolet Radiation and Phytoplankton Biology in Antarctic Waters
Smith, R. C., Prézelin, B. B., Baker, K. S., Bidigare, R. R., Boucher, N. P., Coley, T., Karentz, D., MacIntyre, S., Matlick, H. A., Menzies, D., et al. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1546292 · Cited by 947
An Introduction to Atmospheric Radiation
(1980) · International Geophysics · doi:10.1016/s0074-6142(08)x6038-3 · Cited by 930
Cited by
Roberts, M. R., & Paul, N. D. (2006) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01707.x · Cited by 332
Qu, Z., Oumbe, A., Blanc, P., Espinar, B., Gesell, G., Gschwind, B., Klüser, L., Lefèvre, M., Saboret, L., Schroedter-Homscheidt, M., et al. (2017) · Meteorologische Zeitschrift · doi:10.1127/metz/2016/0781 · Cited by 257
Wang, J., Liu, L., Wang, X., & Chen, Y. (2015) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12812 · Cited by 124
Determinants of hypovitaminosis D in pregnant women and their newborns in a sunny region
Kelishadi, R., Sharifi-Ghazvini, F., Poursafa, P., Mehrabian, F., Farajian, S., Yousefy, H., Movahedian, M., & Sharifi-Ghazvini, S. (2013) · International Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1155/2013/460970 · Cited by 22
Aun, M., Eerme, K., Ansko, I., & Aun, M. (2019) · Theoretical and Applied Climatology · doi:10.1007/s00704-019-02865-1 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Calbó, J., Pagès, D., & González, J.
- Venue
- Reviews of Geophysics
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0096-1043 (ISSN-L)
- 8755-1209
- 1944-9208
- OpenAlex
- W1846317343
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 68
- FWCI
- 8.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Empirical studies of cloud effects on UV radiation: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2004rg000155
- The paper
- Calbó, J., Pagès, D., & González, J. (2005). Empirical studies of cloud effects on UV radiation: A review. Reviews of Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004rg000155
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.