Cited by 28Advanced Aircraft Design and TechnologiesAtmospheric aerosols and cloudsMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations

Sensitivity of contrail cirrus radiative forcing to air traffic scheduling

Open access
Newinger, Christina, Burkhardt, Ulrike·2012·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

Air traffic effects high cloudiness and therefore the Earth's radiation budget by producing contrail cirrus. Contrail cirrus comprise of line‐shaped contrails and irregularly shaped ice clouds that originate from them. The warming effect of contrail cirrus is disproportionally large at night, since at daytime the cooling due to the short wave cloud albedo effect acts toward compensating the long wave warming effect. Therefore it has been suggested to restrict air traffic to daytime in order to reduce its climate impact. The potential for reducing the contrail cirrus radiative forcing by shifting air traffic to daytime depends on the diurnal cycle of contrail cirrus coverage which is in turn determined by the diurnal cycle of air traffic and the contrail cirrus lifetimes. Simulations with a global atmospheric general circulation model indicate that the annual mean contrail cirrus coverage may be almost constant over the day even in areas where air traffic is close to zero at night. A conceptual model describing the temporal evolution of contrail cirrus coverage reveals that this is due to the large variability in contrail cirrus lifetimes in combination with the spreading of contrail cirrus. This large variability of lifetimes is consistent with observational evidence but more observations are needed to constrain the contrail lifetime distribution. An idealized mitigation experiment, shifting nighttime flights to daytime, indicates that contrail cirrus radiative forcing is not significantly changed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2011jd016736

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The uncertainty in the lifetime of contrail cirrus has only a small impact on the estimated contrail cirrus RF.

    “The uncertainty in the lifetime of contrail cirrus, affecting the day-/night-time contrail cover, has only a small impact on the estimated contrail cirrus RF”

    From The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018 (2021) · cites this paper as Newinger and Burkhardt, 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Newinger, C., & Burkhardt, U.
Affiliations
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
Corresponding author
Burkhardt, Ulrike
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2012-05-27
Volume
117
Issue
D10
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999894009
Cited by
28
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
  • elib (German Aerospace Center) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Keywords
contrail cirrus, radiative forcing, air traffic scheduling, diurnal cycle, aviation climate impact, cloud albedo

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review