Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 295

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence of mild cognitive impairment: a population-based study in elderly subjects

Hänninen, T., Hallikainen, M., Tuomainen, S., Vanhanen, M., Soininen, H.·2002·Acta Neurologica Scandinavica

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) has been suggested as a term for a boundary area between normal aging and dementia, especially Alzheimer's disease (AD). In follow-up studies, more than 50% of MCI subjects have been converted to dementia in 3-4 years. However, the epidemiology of MCI is not well known. This study was designed to determine the prevalence of MCI in an elderly population. METHODS: A total of 806 subjects (60-76 years of age) from a population-based random sample of 1150 subjects living in the city of Kuopio in eastern Finland were evaluated. Neuropsychological tests and a structured interview including the modified Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) were used to apply the diagnostic criteria of MCI as proposed by Mayo Clinic Alzheimer's Disease Research Centre. Thus, subjects having a test score more than 1.5 SDs below the age appropriate mean in memory tests and a CDR score of 0.5 but no dementia, were diagnosed as having MCI. RESULTS: A total of 43 subjects, 5.3%, met the MCI criteria. MCI was more prevalent in older and less-educated subjects, but no difference was found between men and women. The CDR appeared to be the most important part of the criteria. The memory tests had less impact on prevalence variables. CONCLUSIONS: The low prevalence of MCI indicate that in a population-based study design its criteria may identify a more homogeneous group of subjects at the lower end of the cognitive continuum as contrasted with various other criteria of cognitive impairment in the elderly population. This is compatible with follow-up studies showing a high probability of dementia in the MCI group. Thus, probable candidates for trials of preventive intervention for dementia can be screened from the elderly population using these diagnostic criteria.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1034/j.1600-0404.2002.01225.x

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 295

Metadata

Authors
Hänninen, T., Hallikainen, M., Tuomainen, S., Vanhanen, M., & Soininen, H.
Venue
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
Published
2002-08-09
Volume
106
Issue
3
Pages
148-154
ISSN
0001-6314 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137730858
Cited by
295
References
7
FWCI
6.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of mild cognitive impairment: a population-based study in elderly subjects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1600-0404.2002.01225.x
The paper
Hänninen, T., Hallikainen, M., Tuomainen, S., Vanhanen, M., & Soininen, H. (2002). Prevalence of mild cognitive impairment: a population-based study in elderly subjects. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0404.2002.01225.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.