Cited by 57Bone Metabolism and DiseasesPhagocytosis and Immune RegulationCell death mechanisms and regulation

Combined TUNEL and TRAP methods suggest that apoptotic bone cells are inside vacuoles of alveolar bone osteoclasts in young rats

Cerri, P. S., Boabaid, F., Katchburian, E.·2003·Journal of Periodontal Research

Abstract

Although it is generally accepted that osteoclasts breakdown and resorb bone matrix, the possibility that they may also be able to engulf apoptotic osteoblasts/lining cells and/or osteocytes remains controversial. Apoptosis of osteoblasts/ lining cells and/or osteocytes and interactions between these cells and osteoclasts are extremely rapid events that are difficult to observe in vivo. A suitable in vivo model for studying these events is the alveolar bone of young rats because it is continuously undergoing intense resorption/remodeling. Thus, sections of aldehyde fixed alveolar bone of young rats were stained by the combined terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase‐mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) method and the tartrate‐resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) method for the simultaneous visualization of apoptotic cells and osteoclasts in the same section. The combined TUNEL and TRAP reactions, in the same section, greatly facilitated visualization of relationship between osteoclasts and apoptotic bone cells during alveolar bone remodeling. Our results showed that several TRAP‐positive osteoclasts exhibited large vacuoles containing TUNEL positive apoptotic structures, probably derived from osteoblasts/lining cells and/or osteocytes. These results support the idea that alveolar bone osteoclasts are able to internalize dying apoptotic bone cells.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1034/j.1600-0765.2003.02006.x

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cerri, P. S., Boabaid, F., & Katchburian, E.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
  • Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Corresponding author
Katchburian, E.
Venue
Journal of Periodontal Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-02-28
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
223-226
ISSN
  • 0022-3484 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0765
OpenAlex
W2040948512
Cited by
57
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Periodontal Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Acervo Digital da Universidade Estadual Paulista (Universidade Estadual Paulista) (submittedVersion)
  • UNESP Institutional Repository (São Paulo State University) (submittedVersion)
  • UNIFESP Institutional Repository (Universidade Federal de São Paulo) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Phagocytosis and Immune Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
Keywords
osteoclasts, apoptosis, alveolar bone, bone remodeling, osteoblasts, osteocytes, vacuoles, TUNEL, traps, bone resorption
MeSH terms
Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase, Acid Phosphatase, Alveolar Process, Animals, Bone Resorption, Coloring Agents, Isoenzymes, Osteoblasts, Osteoclasts, Osteocytes, Phagocytosis, Vacuoles, Biomarkers, Bone Remodeling, Rats, Wistar, Apoptosis, In Situ Nick-End Labeling, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review