Understanding the latent structure of job performance ratings.
Abstract
This study quantified the effects of 5 factors postulated to influence performance ratings: the ratee's general level of performance, the ratee's performance on a specific dimension, the rater's idiosyncratic rating tendencies, the rater's organizational perspective, and random measurement error. Two large data sets, consisting of managers (n = 2,350 and n = 2,142) who received developmental ratings on 3 performance dimensions from 7 raters (2 bosses, 2 peers, 2 subordinates, and self) were used. Results indicated that idiosyncratic rater effects (62% and 53%) accounted for over half of the rating variance in both data sets. The combined effects of general and dimensional ratee performance (21% and 25%) were less than half the size of the idiosyncratic rater effects. Small perspective-related effects were found in boss and subordinate ratings but not in peer ratings. Average random error effects in the 2 data sets were 11% and 18%.
Cites (6)
- Alternative Ways of Assessing Model FitBrowne, Michael W., Cudeck, Robert · 1992 · Sociological Methods & Research
- Comparative fit indexes in structural models.Bentler, P. M. · 1990 · Psychological Bulletin
- Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Campbell, Donald T., Fiske, Donald W. · 1959 · Psychological Bulletin
- Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecificationHu, Li-tze, Bentler, Peter M. · 1998 · Psychological Methods
- THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSISBARRICK, MURRAY R., MOUNT, MICHAEL K. · 1991 · Personnel Psychology
- Test of a latent structure of performance ratings derived from Wherry's (1952) theory of ratingLance, C · 1994 · Journal of Management
Cited by (9)
- On making causal claims: A review and recommendationsAntonakis, John, Bendahan, Samuel, Jacquart, Philippe, Lalive, Rafael · 2010 · The Leadership Quarterly
- Searching for the inverted U-shaped relationship between time and performance: meta-analyses of the experience/performance, tenure/performance, and age/performance relationshipsSturman, M. C. · 2003 · Journal of Management
- Charisma: An ill-defined and ill-measured giftAntonakis, John, Bastardoz, Nicolas, Jacquart, Philippe, Shamir, Boas · 2016 · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
- Causality and EndogeneityAntonakis, John, Bendahan, Samuel, Jacquart, Philippe, Lalive, Rafael · 2014 · Oxford Handbooks Online
- Getting rid of performance ratings: Genius or folly? A debateAdler, Seymour, Campion, Michael, Colquitt, Alan, Grubb, Amy, Murphy, Kevin, Ollander-Krane, Rob, Pulakos, Elaine D. · 2016 · Industrial and Organizational Psychology
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding the latent structure of job performance ratings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0021-9010.85.6.956
- The paper
- Scullen, S. E., Mount, M. K., & Goff, M. (2000). Understanding the latent structure of job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.85.6.956
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.