Understanding the latent structure of job performance ratings.

Steven E. Scullen, Michael Kelly Mount, Maynard Goff·2000·Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract

This study quantified the effects of 5 factors postulated to influence performance ratings: the ratee's general level of performance, the ratee's performance on a specific dimension, the rater's idiosyncratic rating tendencies, the rater's organizational perspective, and random measurement error. Two large data sets, consisting of managers (n = 2,350 and n = 2,142) who received developmental ratings on 3 performance dimensions from 7 raters (2 bosses, 2 peers, 2 subordinates, and self) were used. Results indicated that idiosyncratic rater effects (62% and 53%) accounted for over half of the rating variance in both data sets. The combined effects of general and dimensional ratee performance (21% and 25%) were less than half the size of the idiosyncratic rater effects. Small perspective-related effects were found in boss and subordinate ratings but not in peer ratings. Average random error effects in the 2 data sets were 11% and 18%.

Cites (6)

  1. Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
    Browne, Michael W., Cudeck, Robert · 1992 · Sociological Methods & Research
  2. Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
    Bentler, P. M. · 1990 · Psychological Bulletin
  3. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
    Campbell, Donald T., Fiske, Donald W. · 1959 · Psychological Bulletin
  4. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification
    Hu, Li-tze, Bentler, Peter M. · 1998 · Psychological Methods
  5. THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
    BARRICK, MURRAY R., MOUNT, MICHAEL K. · 1991 · Personnel Psychology
  6. Test of a latent structure of performance ratings derived from Wherry's (1952) theory of rating
    Lance, C · 1994 · Journal of Management

Show all 6 references

Cited by (9)

  1. On making causal claims: A review and recommendations
    Antonakis, John, Bendahan, Samuel, Jacquart, Philippe, Lalive, Rafael · 2010 · The Leadership Quarterly
  2. Searching for the inverted U-shaped relationship between time and performance: meta-analyses of the experience/performance, tenure/performance, and age/performance relationships
    Sturman, M. C. · 2003 · Journal of Management
  3. Charisma: An ill-defined and ill-measured gift
    Antonakis, John, Bastardoz, Nicolas, Jacquart, Philippe, Shamir, Boas · 2016 · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
  4. Causality and Endogeneity
    Antonakis, John, Bendahan, Samuel, Jacquart, Philippe, Lalive, Rafael · 2014 · Oxford Handbooks Online
  5. Getting rid of performance ratings: Genius or folly? A debate
    Adler, Seymour, Campion, Michael, Colquitt, Alan, Grubb, Amy, Murphy, Kevin, Ollander-Krane, Rob, Pulakos, Elaine D. · 2016 · Industrial and Organizational Psychology

See all 343

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding the latent structure of job performance ratings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0021-9010.85.6.956
The paper
Scullen, S. E., Mount, M. K., & Goff, M. (2000). Understanding the latent structure of job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.85.6.956

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.