The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reciprocation of perceived organizational support.
Abstract
Four hundred thirteen postal employees were surveyed to investigate reciprocation's role in the relationships of perceived organizational support (POS) with employees' affective organizational commitment and job performance. The authors found that (a) POS was positively related to employees' felt obligation to care about the organization's welfare and to help the organization reach its objectives; (b) felt obligation mediated the associations of POS with affective commitment, organizational spontaneity, and in-role performance; and (c) the relationship between POS and felt obligation increased with employees' acceptance of the reciprocity norm as applied to work organizations. Positive mood also mediated the relationships of POS with affective commitment and organizational spontaneity. The pattern of findings is consistent with organizational support theory's assumption that POS strengthens affective commitment and performance by a reciprocation process.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Perceived organizational support reduces burnout and enhances job satisfaction, thereby supporting teachers' wellbeing.
“Studies underline the critical role of perceived support in supporting teachers’ wellbeing by reducing burnout and enhancing job satisfaction (Eisenberger et al., 2001; Collie et al., 2015).”
From Exploring the impact of workload, organizational support, and work engagement on teachers' psychological wellbeing: a structural equation modeling approach (2024) · cites this paper as Eisenberger et al., 2001
Perceived organizational support is positively correlated with teacher wellbeing; teachers perceiving higher organizational support report lower stress, burnout, and job dissatisfaction.
“Extensive research consistently indicates a positive correlation between POS and teacher wellbeing. Teachers perceiving higher organizational support levels report lower stress, burnout, and job dissatisfaction (Eisenberger et al., 2001; Rhoades and Eisenberger, 2002).”
From Exploring the impact of workload, organizational support, and work engagement on teachers' psychological wellbeing: a structural equation modeling approach (2024) · cites this paper as Eisenberger et al., 2001
Perceived organizational support is crucial in fostering work engagement among educators.
“The role of POS emerges as crucial in fostering work engagement among educators. A supportive organizational environment enhances teachers’ feelings of value and engagement in their professional roles (Eisenberger et al., 2001; Bakker and Demerouti, 2008; Bakker et al., 2011; Derakhshan et al., 2023).”
From Exploring the impact of workload, organizational support, and work engagement on teachers' psychological wellbeing: a structural equation modeling approach (2024) · cites this paper as Eisenberger et al., 2001
Perceived organizational support positively influences teachers' job satisfaction, commitment, and overall wellbeing.
“When educators perceive robust support from their educational institutions, it positively influences their job satisfaction, commitment, and overall wellbeing (Eisenberger et al., 2001; Sudibjo and Manihuruk, 2022).”
From Exploring the impact of workload, organizational support, and work engagement on teachers' psychological wellbeing: a structural equation modeling approach (2024) · cites this paper as Eisenberger et al., 2001
Perceived organizational support influences educators' work engagement, fostering a constructive work-related state.
“Perceived organizational support profoundly influences educators’ work engagement, fostering a constructive work-related state (Eisenberger et al., 2001; Xanthopoulou et al., 2009; Sudibjo and Manihuruk, 2022; Journell, 2023).”
From Exploring the impact of workload, organizational support, and work engagement on teachers' psychological wellbeing: a structural equation modeling approach (2024) · cites this paper as Eisenberger et al., 2001
Citations
Cites
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement
Gouldner, A. W. (1960) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092623 · Cited by 12,001
A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-z · Cited by 11,049
Perceived organizational support.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500 · Cited by 10,023
Self-citationPsychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements
Rousseau, D. (1995) · doi:10.4135/9781452231594 · Cited by 3,453
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 51
- Aiken, 1991, Multiple regression: Testing and interpretinginteractions.
- Allen. The measurement and antecedents of affective,continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. 53 337 1990 · DOI
- 10.1006/jvbe.1996.0043 · DOI
- Arbuckle, 1997, AMOS users' guide version3.6.
- 10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.288 · DOI
- 10.2307/258189 · DOI
- Batson, 1993, Communal and exchange relationships: What is thedifference?, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 677, 10.1177/0146167293196002 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0024198 · DOI
- Blau, 1964, Exchange and power in sociallife.
- 10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1091 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.45.5.1045 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.53.4.743 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.812 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.75.1.51 · DOI
- Foa, 1974, Societal structures of the mind.
- 10.1037/0021-9010.76.2.299 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.310 · DOI
- 10.2307/256516 · DOI
- Greenberg, 1976, Indebtedness as a motive for acquisition of“helpful” information., Representative Research in Social Psychology, 7, 19
- 10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.617 · DOI
- Hutchison, 1997, A path model of perceived organizational support., Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 159
- 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb00075.x · DOI
- James, 1982, Causal analysis: Assumptions, models,and data.
- 10.2307/255757 · DOI
- Kline, 1998, Principles and practices of structural equationmodeling.
- 10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.961 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.84.4.467 · DOI
- Mael, 1992, Identifying organizational identification., Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 813, 10.1177/0013164492052004002 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.277 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.171 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.79.6.836 · DOI
- Meyer, 1997, Commitment in the workplace: Theory,research, and application., 10.4135/9781452231556 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/256913 · DOI
- Mowday, 1982, Employee-organizational linkages: Thepsychology of commitment, absenteeism, andturnover.
- 10.1016/0001-8791(79)90072-1 · DOI
- Robinson, 1995, Psychological contracts and OCB: The effect of unfulfilledobligations on civic virtue behavior., Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 289, 10.1002/job.4030160309 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01384942 · DOI
- Rousseau, 1990, New hire perceptions of their own and their employer'sobligations: a study of psychological contracts., Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11, 389, 10.1002/job.4030110506 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0021-9010.81.3.219 · DOI
- Shore, 1995, Perceived organizational support and organizationaljustice., 149
- 10.1037/0021-9010.76.5.637 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0021-9010.78.5.774 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.68.4.653 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0042782 · DOI
- 10.2307/256928 · DOI
- 10.2307/256600 · DOI
- 10.2307/257021 · DOI
- 10.1177/014920639101700305 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00483.x · DOI
- Zimbardo, 1991, The psychology of attitude change and socialinfluence.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206305279602 · Cited by 10,068
Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.909 · Cited by 2,606
Emotional intelligence: An integrative meta-analysis and cascading model
Joseph, D. L., & Newman, D. A. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017286 · Cited by 1,722
Psychological Antecedents of Promotive and Prohibitive Voice: A Two-Wave Examination
Liang, J., Farh, C. I. C., & Farh, J.-L. (2012) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0176 · Cited by 1,647
Eisenberger, R., Karagonlar, G., Stinglhamber, F., Neves, P., Becker, T. E., Gonzalez-Morales, M. G., & Steiger-Mueller, M. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0020858 · Cited by 652
Self-citationThriving at work: A meta‐analysis
Kleine, A., Rudolph, C. W., & Zacher, H. (2019) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2375 · Cited by 606
Sturman, M. C. (2003) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/s0149-2063_03_00028-x · Cited by 578
Chamberlin, M., Newton, D. W., & Lepine, J. A. (2017) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12185 · Cited by 532
Mulki, J. P., Jaramillo, F., & Locander, W. B. (2006) · Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management · doi:10.2753/pss0885-3134260102 · Cited by 319
Gillet, N., Gagné, M., Sauvagère, S., & Fouquereau, E. (2013) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2012.665228 · Cited by 295
Scale indicators of social exchange relationships: A comparison of relative content validity.
Colquitt, J. A., Baer, M. D., Long, D. M., & Halvorsen-Ganepola, M. D. K. (2014) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0036374 · Cited by 238
Leader Self‐Reported Emotional Intelligence and Perceived Employee Creativity: An Exploratory Study
Rego, A., Sousa, F., Pina e Cunha, M., Correia, A., & Saur‐Amaral, I. (2007) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00435.x · Cited by 218
Suazo, M. M. (2009) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940910928856 · Cited by 210
Hill, N. S., Seo, M.-G., Kang, J. H., & Taylor, M. S. (2012) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0662 · Cited by 203
Zhang, S. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3966-3 · Cited by 180
Wells, D. L., Moorman, R. H., & Werner, J. M. (2007) · Human Resource Development Quarterly · doi:10.1002/hrdq.1194 · Cited by 117
Basit, A. A. (2017) · The Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00223980.2017.1372350 · Cited by 100
Wang, Y. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1345740 · Cited by 104
Supported Supervisors Are More Supportive, but Why? A Multilevel Study of Mechanisms and Outcomes
Frear, K. A., Donsbach, J., Theilgard, N., & Shanock, L. R. (2018) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-016-9485-2 · Cited by 53
Soh, M., Zarola, A., Palaiou, K., & Furnham, A. (2016) · Health Psychology Open · doi:10.1177/2055102916628380 · Cited by 48
Sudibjo, N., & Manihuruk, A. M. (2022) · Psychology Research and Behavior Management · doi:10.2147/prbm.s361881 · Cited by 42
Why Am I Willing to Speak Up? The Impact of Spiritual Leadership on Employee Voice Behavior
Yang, X., Meng, Y., Qiu, Y., & Feng, Y. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02718 · Cited by 24
Feng, G., Shi, K., Huang, Q., & Ma, J. (2024) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0310078 · Cited by 6
İçsel pazarlamanın yaratıcı çalışan performansı üzerindeki etkisinde narsist liderliğin rolü
KAYNAK, İ., AKILLIBAŞ, E., & ÇİÇEK, B. (2022) · Business & Management Studies: An International Journal · doi:10.15295/bmij.v10i2.2014 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P. D., & Rhoades, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Delaware (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 2001-02
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 42-51
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W2032427428
- Cited by
- 3,106
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 158 · 2025: 161 · 2024: 203 · 2023: 204 · 2022: 250 · 2021: 205 · 2020: 198 · 2019: 179 · 2018: 185 · 2017: 152 · 2016: 153 · 2015: 168 · 2014: 158 · 2013: 121 · 2012: 116
- FWCI
- 40.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Management
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
- Keywords
- perceived organizational support, reciprocity, affective commitment, employee performance, felt obligation, positive mood, reciprocity norms, postal workers, organizational support theory
- MeSH terms
- Affect, Employment, Humans, Perception, Surveys and Questionnaires, Organizational Culture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
