Cited by 24Workplace Spirituality and LeadershipJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorLeadership and Management in Organizations

Why Am I Willing to Speak Up? The Impact of Spiritual Leadership on Employee Voice Behavior

Open access
Yang, Xuhua, Meng, Yuchen, Qiu, Yong, Feng, Yaqian·2019·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

The sustainability of organizations highlights the significance of inspiring employees, especially their inner lives or spiritual identities, and leaders play a vital role. Consistent with social cognitive theory, the purpose of this paper is to explore the linking mechanisms and conditional processes underlying the relationship between spiritual leadership and employee voice behavior. Three-wave survey data were collected from 366 full-time employees and their line managers, and a moderated mediation analysis was performed. The results show that career success expectation fully mediates the relationship between spiritual leadership and employee voice behavior. Additionally, felt obligation is found to indirectly strengthen the effect of spiritual leadership on employee voice behavior via career success expectation. In light of the results, practical implications are provided for managers and future researchers to enhance the sustainability of organizations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02718

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prohibitive voice can lead to negative consequences for the speaker, including managerial retaliation, strained workplace relationships, or exclusion from important decision-making processes.

    “prohibitive voice can lead to negative consequences for the speaker, including managerial retaliation, strained workplace relationships, or exclusion from important decision-making processes13–16.”

    From Leader prohibitive voice shapes employee voice through psychological safety moderated by self-efficacy and generational differences (2025) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Introduction (page not provided) says employee voice is risky and may upset workplace relationships, especially with managers who control resources and rewards. The Measures section also says voice may carry high personal costs. Neither passage specifically addresses prohibitive voice or identifies managerial retaliation or exclusion from decision-making as consequences. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Deng Z. (2016). The impact of spiritual leadership on employee’s job engagement. Econ. Manag. 38 181– 189. 10.19616/j.cnki.bmj.2016.04.017 · DOI
  2. Meng Y. Yang X. Qiu Y. (2018). From “external constraints” to “intrinsic motivation”: research on mechanism of spiritual leadership influences employees’ voice behaviors. Hum. Resour. Dev. 35 6– 17. 10.16471/j.cnki.11-2822/c.2018.03.000 · DOI
  3. Qiu Y. Meng Y. Yang X. (2019). How does spiritual leadership inspire innovation?-the study on the Chain mediating effect of leader-member exchange and organizational identification. East China Econ. Manag. 33 44– 50. 10.19629/j.cnki.34-1014/f.180209007 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, X., Meng, Y., Qiu, Y., & Feng, Y.
Affiliations
  • Capital University of Economics and Business (CN)
  • Beijing Technology and Business University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Meng, Yuchen
  • Qiu, Yong
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2019-12-05
Volume
10
Pages
2718-2718
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2992592066
Cited by
24
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation (9184020)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
Keywords
spiritual leadership, employee voice behavior, felt obligation, spiritual identity, social cognitive theory, moderated mediation, organizational sustainability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review