Individual differences in reading to summarize expository text: Evidence from eye fixation patterns.

Jukka Hyönä, Jr. Lorch Robert F., Johanna K. Kaakinen·2002·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

Eye fixation patterns were used to identify reading strategies of adults as they read multiple-topic expository texts. A clustering technique distinguished 4 strategies that differed with respect to the ways in which readers reprocessed text. The processing of fast linear readers was characterized by the absence of fixations returning to previous text. Slow linear readers made lots of forward fixations and reinspected each sentence before moving to the next. The reading of nonselective reviewers was characterized by look backs to previous sentences. The distinctive feature of topic structure processors was that they paid close attention to headings. They also had the largest working-memory capacity and wrote the most accurate text summaries. Thus, qualitatively distinct reading strategies are observable among competent, adult readers.

Cites (2)

  1. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research
    Rayner, Keith · 1998 · Psychological Bulletin
  2. Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: A test of four hypotheses.
    Engle, Randall W., Cantor, Judy, Carullo, Julie J. · 1992 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

Show all 2 references

Cited by (4)

  1. How many words do we read per minute? A review and meta-analysis of reading rate
    Brysbaert, Marc · 2019 · Journal of Memory and Language
  2. Aging and self-regulated language processing.
    Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A. L., Miller, Lisa M. Soederberg, Hertzog, Christopher · 2006 · Psychological Bulletin
  3. Inferring mindful cognitive‐processing of peer‐feedback via eye‐tracking: role of feedback‐characteristics, fixation‐durations and transitions
    Bolzer, M., Strijbos, J.W., Fischer, F. · 2015 · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
  4. When and how learners engage with source information in digital multiple-text reading: effects of task instruction and text trustworthiness from eye-tracking technology
    Guan, Zheng-Hong, Lin, Sunny S.J. · 2025 · Computers & Education

See all 343

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Individual differences in reading to summarize expository text: Evidence from eye fixation patterns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-0663.94.1.44
The paper
Hyönä, J., Jr. Lorch Robert, F., & Kaakinen, J. K. (2002). Individual differences in reading to summarize expository text: Evidence from eye fixation patterns. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.94.1.44

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.