Social judgeability: The impact of meta-informational cues on the use of stereotypes.

Yzerbyt, Vincent Y., Schadron, Georges, Leyens, Jacques-Philippe, Rocher, Stephan·1994·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

According to a social judgeability analysis, a crucial determinant of impression formation is the extent to which people feel entitled to judge a target person. Two experiments tested the impact of the subjective availability of individuating information on a social judgment independent of its actual presence. In Experiment 1, people made a stereotypical judgement when they believed individuating information was present even if no information was in fact given. In Experiment 2, Ss who thought they received individuating information made more extreme and confident judgments than Ss who thought they received category information. This indicates that Ss' judgments were not simply a function of implicit demand: The illusion of receiving individuating information led Ss to believe they possessed the necessary evidence for legitimate decision making. This result supports the existence of rules in the social inference process.

Cites (5)

  1. Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components
    Devine, Patricia G. · 1989 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  2. Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: Biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm.
    Ross, Lee, Lepper, Mark R., Hubbard, Michael · 1975 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  3. A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception.
    Reeder, Glenn D., Brewer, Marilynn B. · 1979 · Psychological Review
  4. The dilution effect: Nondiagnostic information weakens the implications of diagnostic information
    Nisbett, Richard E., Zukier, Henry, Lemley, Ronald E. · 1981 · Cognitive Psychology
  5. Accountability and the Perseverance of First Impressions
    Tetlock, Philip E. · 1983 · Social Psychology Quarterly

Show all 5 references

Cited by (17)

  1. A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice.
    Crandall, Christian S., Eshleman, Amy · 2003 · Psychological Bulletin
  2. The Emotional Side of Prejudice: The Attribution of Secondary Emotions to Ingroups and Outgroups
    Leyens, Jacques-Philippe, Paladino, Paola M., Rodriguez-Torres, Ramon, Vaes, Jeroen, Demoulin, Stéphanie, Rodriguez-Perez, Armando, Gaunt, Ruth · 2000 · Personality and Social Psychology Review
  3. Reactions to Counterstereotypic Behavior: The Role of Backlash in Cultural Stereotype Maintenance.
    Rudman, Laurie A., Fairchild, Kimberly · 2004 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  4. Understanding implicit and explicit attitude change: A systems of reasoning analysis.
    Rydell, Robert J., McConnell, Allen R. · 2006 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  5. The White standard: racial bias in leader categorization
    Rosette, Ashleigh Shelby, Leonardelli, Geoffrey J., Phillips, Katherine W. · 2008 · Journal of Applied Psychology

See all 223

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social judgeability: The impact of meta-informational cues on the use of stereotypes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.66.1.48
The paper
Yzerbyt, V. Y., Schadron, G., Leyens, J.-P., & Rocher, S. (1994). Social judgeability: The impact of meta-informational cues on the use of stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.66.1.48

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.