Category and stereotype activation: Is prejudice inevitable?

Lepore, Lorella, Brown, Rupert·1997·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Three experiments tested the hypothesis that people high and low in prejudice respond similarly to direct stereotype activation but differently to category activation. Study 1 (N=40) showed that high- and low-prejudice people share the same knowledge of the stereotype of Black people. In Study 2, (N=51) high-prejudice participants formed a more negative and less positive impression of the target person after subliminal priming of the category Blacks than did participants in the no-prime condition. Low-prejudice people tended in the opposite direction. In Study 3 (N=45), both high- and low-prejudice people increased negative ratings when valenced stereotype content was also primed. These findings support a distinction between automatic stereotype activation resulting from direct priming and that consequent upon category activation, implying that the relations among categorization, stereotyping, and prejudice are more flexible than it is often assumed.

Cites (128)

  1. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
    Festinger, Leon · 1957
  2. Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
    2022 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
  3. Untitled work
    1954
  4. The Handbook of Social Psychology
    Gravatt, Arthur E., Lindzey, G., Aronson, F. · 1969 · The Family Coordinator
  5. A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.
    Collins, Allan M., Loftus, Elizabeth F. · 1975 · Psychological Review
  6. Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods
    MacKinnon, David P., Lockwood, Chondra M., Williams, Jason · 2004 · Multivariate Behavioral Research
  7. Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory
    Shiffrin, Richard M., Schneider, Walter · 1977 · Psychological Review
  8. The Architecture of Cognition
    Anderson, John R. · 2013
  9. Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes
    Greenwald, Anthony G., Banaji, Mahzarin R. · 1995 · Psychological Review
  10. Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components
    Devine, Patricia G. · 1989 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Show all 128 references

Cited by (49)

  1. Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action.
    John A. Bargh, Mark I-Cheng Chen, Lara Burrows · 1996 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  2. A model of dual attitudes.
    Wilson, Timothy D., Lindsey, Samuel, Schooler, Tonya Y. · 2000 · Psychological Review
  3. Untitled work
    2003 · 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225
  4. Social identity theory: past achievements, current problems and future challenges
    Brown, Rupert · 2000 · European Journal of Social Psychology
  5. Social Cognition: Thinking Categorically about Others
    Macrae, C. Neil, Bodenhausen, Galen V. · 2000 · Annual Review of Psychology

See all 615

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Category and stereotype activation: Is prejudice inevitable? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.72.2.275
The paper
Lepore, L., & Brown, R. (1997). Category and stereotype activation: Is prejudice inevitable? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.72.2.275

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.