Category and stereotype activation: Is prejudice inevitable?
Abstract
Three experiments tested the hypothesis that people high and low in prejudice respond similarly to direct stereotype activation but differently to category activation. Study 1 (N=40) showed that high- and low-prejudice people share the same knowledge of the stereotype of Black people. In Study 2, (N=51) high-prejudice participants formed a more negative and less positive impression of the target person after subliminal priming of the category Blacks than did participants in the no-prime condition. Low-prejudice people tended in the opposite direction. In Study 3 (N=45), both high- and low-prejudice people increased negative ratings when valenced stereotype content was also primed. These findings support a distinction between automatic stereotype activation resulting from direct priming and that consequent upon category activation, implying that the relations among categorization, stereotyping, and prejudice are more flexible than it is often assumed.
Cites (128)
- A Theory of Cognitive DissonanceFestinger, Leon · 1957
- Advances In Experimental Social Psychology2022 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
- Untitled work1954
- The Handbook of Social PsychologyGravatt, Arthur E., Lindzey, G., Aronson, F. · 1969 · The Family Coordinator
- A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.Collins, Allan M., Loftus, Elizabeth F. · 1975 · Psychological Review
- Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling MethodsMacKinnon, David P., Lockwood, Chondra M., Williams, Jason · 2004 · Multivariate Behavioral Research
- Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theoryShiffrin, Richard M., Schneider, Walter · 1977 · Psychological Review
- The Architecture of CognitionAnderson, John R. · 2013
- Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypesGreenwald, Anthony G., Banaji, Mahzarin R. · 1995 · Psychological Review
- Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled componentsDevine, Patricia G. · 1989 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Cited by (49)
- Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action.John A. Bargh, Mark I-Cheng Chen, Lara Burrows · 1996 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- A model of dual attitudes.Wilson, Timothy D., Lindsey, Samuel, Schooler, Tonya Y. · 2000 · Psychological Review
- Untitled work2003 · 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225
- Social identity theory: past achievements, current problems and future challengesBrown, Rupert · 2000 · European Journal of Social Psychology
- Social Cognition: Thinking Categorically about OthersMacrae, C. Neil, Bodenhausen, Galen V. · 2000 · Annual Review of Psychology
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Category and stereotype activation: Is prejudice inevitable? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.72.2.275
- The paper
- Lepore, L., & Brown, R. (1997). Category and stereotype activation: Is prejudice inevitable? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.72.2.275
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.