On being happy and mistaken: Mood effects on the fundamental attribution error.
Abstract
Does temporary mood influence the occurrence of the fundamental attribution error (FAE)? Based on recent affect-cognition theorizing and research on attributions, 3 experiments predicted and found that negative moods decrease and positive moods increase the FAE, because of the information-processing consequences of these affective states. In Experiment 1, happy mood enhanced and sad mood reduced dispositional attributions based on coerced essays advocating unpopular opinions. Experiment 2 replicated this effect using an unobtrusive mood induction in a field study. Experiment 3 further confirmed these results and also showed that changes in the FAE were linked to mood-induced differences in processing style, as indicated by memory data and confirmed by mediational analyses. The results are discussed in terms of the cognitive processing strategies that mediate mood effects on attributions. The implications of the findings for everyday inferences and for contemporary theories of affect and cognition are considered.
Cites (9)
- Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.Nisbett, Richard E., Wilson, Timothy D. · 1977 · Psychological Review
- Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation.Abramson, Lyn Y., Seligman, Martin E., Teasdale, John D. · 1978 · Journal of Abnormal Psychology
- Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM).Forgas, Joseph P. · 1995 · Psychological Bulletin
- From acts to dispositions the attribution process in person perceptionJones, Edward E., Davis, Keith E. · 1965 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
- An Experimental Study of Apparent BehaviorHeider, Fritz, Simmel, Marianne · 1944 · The American Journal of Psychology
- The correspondence bias.Gilbert, Daniel T., Malone, Patrick S. · 1995 · Psychological Bulletin
- The attribution of attitudesJones, Edward E, Harris, Victor A · 1967 · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
- Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: Biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm.Ross, Lee, Lepper, Mark R., Hubbard, Michael · 1975 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Perceiver-induced constraint: Interpretations of self-generated reality.Gilbert, Daniel T., Jones, Edward E. · 1986 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Cited by (18)
- Fear, anger, and risk.Lerner, Jennifer S., Keltner, Dacher · 2001 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- The nature of awe: elicitors, appraisals, and effects on self-conceptShiota, Michelle N., Keltner, Dacher, Mossman, Amanda · 2007 · Cognition and Emotion
- Social class, sense of control, and social explanation.Kraus, Michael W., Piff, Paul K., Keltner, Dacher · 2009 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Affective Influences on Judgments and Behavior in Organizations: An Information Processing PerspectiveForgas, Joseph P., George, Jennifer M. · 2001 · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
- Emotion and Rationality: A Critical Review and Interpretation of Empirical EvidencePham, Michel Tuan · 2007 · Review of General Psychology
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On being happy and mistaken: Mood effects on the fundamental attribution error. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.75.2.318
- The paper
- Forgas, J. P. (1998). On being happy and mistaken: Mood effects on the fundamental attribution error. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.75.2.318
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.