Cited by 552Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPsychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

Emotion and Rationality: A Critical Review and Interpretation of Empirical Evidence

Pham, Michel Tuan·2007·Review of General Psychology

Abstract

The relation between emotion and rationality is assessed by reviewing empirical findings from multiple disciplines. Two types of emotional phenomena are examined—incidental emotional states and integral emotional responses—and three conceptions of rationality are considered—logical, material, and ecological. Emotional states influence reasoning processes, are often misattributed to focal objects, distort beliefs in an assimilative fashion, disrupt self-control when intensely negative, but do not necessarily increase risk-taking. Integral emotional responses are often used as proxies for values, and valuations based on these responses exhibit distinct properties: efficiency, consistency, polarization, myopia, scale- insensitivity, and reference-dependence. Emotions seem to promote social and moral behavior. Conjectures about the design features of the affective system that give rise to seeming sources of rationality or irrationality are proposed. It is concluded that any categorical statement about the overall rationality or irrationality of emotion would be misleading.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1089-2680.11.2.155

Cites

231 of 231 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pham, M. T.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Pham, Michel Tuan
Venue
Review of General Psychology
Published
2007-06
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
155-178
ISSN
  • 1089-2680 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1552
OpenAlex
W2097740601
Cited by
552
References
231
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 27
FWCI
14.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Review of General Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Columbia University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Keywords
reason and emotion, emotional state, belief distortion, self-control, risk-taking, values, affective valuation, reference dependence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review