Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers.

Laurie Ann Rudman, Peter Glick·1999·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Women who display masculine, agentic traits are viewed as violating prescriptions of feminine niceness (L. A. Rudman, 1998). By legitimizing niceness as an employment criterion, "feminization" of management (requiring both agentic and communal traits for managers) may unintentionally promote discrimination against competent women. Participants made hiring recommendations for a feminized or masculine managerial job. Agentic female job applicants were viewed as less socially skilled than agentic males, but this perception only resulted in hiring discrimination for the feminized, not the masculine, job. Communal applicants (regardless of sex) invariably received low hiring ratings. Thus, women must present themselves as agentic to be hireable, but may therefore be seen as interpersonally deficient. Ironically, the feminization of management may legitimize discrimination against competent, agentic women.

Cites (5)

  1. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations
    Baron, Reuben M., Kenny, David A. · 1986 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  2. The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism.
    Glick, Peter, Fiske, Susan T. · 1996 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  3. Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management.
    Rudman, Laurie A. · 1998 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  4. Gender Stereotypes and Attitudes Toward Women and Men
    Eagly, Alice H., Mladinic, Antonio · 1989 · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  5. What mediates sex discrimination in hiring decisions?
    Glick, Peter, Zion, Cari, Nelson, Cynthia · 1988 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Show all 5 references

Cited by (35)

  1. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.
    Eagly, Alice H., Karau, Steven J. · 2002 · Psychological Review
  2. The gender similarities hypothesis.
    Hyde, Janet Shibley · 2005 · American Psychologist
  3. Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms
    Koenig, Anne M., Eagly, Alice H., Mitchell, Abigail A., Ristikari, Tiina · 2011 · Psychological Bulletin
  4. What Women and Men Should Be, Shouldn't be, are Allowed to be, and don't Have to Be: The Contents of Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes
    Prentice, Deborah A., Carranza, Erica · 2002 · Psychology of Women Quarterly
  5. Penalties for Success: Reactions to Women Who Succeed at Male Gender-Typed Tasks.
    Heilman, Madeline E., Wallen, Aaron S., Fuchs, Daniella, Tamkins, Melinda M. · 2004 · Journal of Applied Psychology

See all 865

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.77.5.1004
The paper
Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.77.5.1004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.