Gender differences in aggression as a function of provocation: A meta-analysis.
Abstract
In this article, we meta-analytically examine experimental studies to assess the moderating effect of provocation on gender differences in aggression. Convergent evidence shows that, whereas unprovoked men are more aggressive than women, provocation markedly attenuates this gender difference. Gender differences in appraisals of provocation intensity and fear of danger from retaliation (but not negative affect) partially mediate the attenuating effect of provocation. However, they do not entirely account for its manipulated effect. Type of provocation and other contextual variables also affect the magnitude of gender differences in aggression. The results support a social role analysis of gender differences in aggression and counter A. H. Eagly and V. Steffen's (1986) meta-analytic inability to confirm an attenuating effect of provocation on gender differences in aggression.
Cites (6)
- Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.Shrout, Patrick E., Fleiss, Joseph L. · 1979 · Psychological Bulletin
- The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statementGouldner, Alvin W. · 1960 · American Sociological Review
- A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children's social adjustmentCrick, Nicki R., Dodge, Kenneth A. · 1994 · Psychological Bulletin
- Frustration-aggression hypothesis: Examination and reformulation.Berkowitz, Leonard · 1989 · Psychological Bulletin
- Does affect induce self-focused attention?Wood, Joanne V., Saltzberg, Judith A., Goldsamt, Lloyd A. · 1990 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Effect of resource class on retaliation to injustice in interpersonal exchangeDonnenwerth, Gregory V., Foa, Uriel G. · 1974 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Cited by (44)
- Human AggressionAnderson, Craig A., Bushman, Brad J. · 2002 · Annual Review of Psychology
- The gender similarities hypothesis.Hyde, Janet Shibley · 2005 · American Psychologist
- Personality Development: Stability and ChangeCaspi, Avshalom, Roberts, Brent W., Shiner, Rebecca L. · 2005 · Annual Review of Psychology
- Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation.Bussey, Kay, Bandura, Albert · 1999 · Psychological Review
- Sex Differences in Aggression in Real-World Settings: A Meta-Analytic ReviewArcher, John · 2004 · Review of General Psychology
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gender differences in aggression as a function of provocation: A meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0033-2909.119.3.422
- The paper
- Bettencourt, B. A., & Miller, N. (1996). Gender differences in aggression as a function of provocation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.119.3.422
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.