Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories.
Abstract
Three possible determinants of graded structure (typicality) were observed in common taxonomic categories and goal-derived categories: (1) an exemplar's similarity to ideals associated with goals its category serves; (2) an exemplar's similarity to the central tendency of its category (family resemblance); and (3) an exemplar's frequency of instantiation (people's subjective estimates of how often it is encountered as a category member). Experiment 1 found that central tendency did not predict graded structure in goal-derived categories, although it did predict graded structure in common taxonomic categories. Ideals and frequency of instantiation predicted graded structure in both category types to sizeable and equal extents. A fourth possible determinant--familiarity--did not predict typicality in either common taxonomic or goal-derived categories. Experiment 2 demonstrated that both central tendency and ideals causally determine graded structure, and work showing that frequency causally determines graded structure is discussed. Experiment 2 also demonstrated that the determinants of a particular category's graded structure can change with context. Whereas ideals may determine a category's graded structure in one context, central tendency may determine a different graded structure in another. It is proposed that graded structures do not reflect invariant structures associated with categories but instead reflect people's dynamic ability to construct concepts.
Cites (4)
- Basic objects in natural categoriesRosch, Eleanor, Mervis, Carolyn B, Gray, Wayne D, Johnson, David M, Boyes-Braem, Penny · 1976 · Cognitive Psychology
- Automatic and effortful processes in memory.Hasher, Lynn, Zacks, Rose T. · 1979 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
- Ad hoc categoriesBarsalou, Lawrence W. · 1983 · Memory & Cognition
- Repetition and MemoryHintzman, Douglas L. · 1976 · Psychology of Learning and Motivation
Cited by (32)
- Perceptual symbol systemsBarsalou, Lawrence W. · 1999 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Dimensions of Consumer ExpertiseAlba, Joseph W., Hutchinson, J. Wesley · 1987 · Journal of Consumer Research
- Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.Kahneman, Daniel, Frederick, Shane · 2002 · Heuristics and Biases
- The Affect HeuristicSlovic, Paul, Finucane, Melissa, Peters, Ellen, MacGregor, Donald G. · 2002 · Heuristics and Biases
- “Clinical versus Actuarial Judgment.”Dawes, Robyn M., Faust, David, Meehl, Paul E. · 1989 · Science
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0278-7393.11.1-4.629
- The paper
- Barsalou, L. W. (1985). Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.11.1-4.629
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.