The psychology of science: Review and integration of a nascent discipline.

Feist, Gregory J., Gorman, Michael E.·1998·Review of General Psychology

Abstract

Disciplines that study science are relatively well established in philosophy, history, and sociology. Psychology of science, by comparison, is a late bloomer but has recently shown signs of codification. The authors further this codification by integrating and reviewing the growing literature in the developmental, cognitive, personality, and social psychology of science. Only by integrating the findings from each of these perspectives can the basic questions in the study of scientific behavior be answered: Who becomes a scientist and what role do biology, family, school, and gender play? Are productivity, scientific reasoning, and theory acceptance influenced by age? What thought processes and heuristics lead to successful discovery? What personality characteristics distinguish scientists from nonscientists and eminent from less eminent scientists? Finally, how do intergroup relations and social forces influence scientific behavior? A model that integrates the consensual empirical findings from the psychology of science is proposed.

Cites (13)

  1. Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority
    Asch, Solomon E. · 1956 · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied
  2. Pygmalion in the classroom
    Rosenthal, Robert, Jacobson, Lenore · 1968 · The Urban Review
  3. Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing
    Klayman, Joshua, Ha, Young-won · 1987 · Psychological Review
  4. Dual space search during scientific reasoning
    Klahr, David, Dunbar, Kevin · 1988 · Cognitive Science
  5. Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system
    Mahoney, Michael J. · 1977 · Cognitive Therapy and Research
  6. Children and adults as intuitive scientists.
    Kuhn, Deanna · 1989 · Psychological Review
  7. Genius: The Natural History of Creativity
    Eysenck, H. J. · 1995
  8. The effect of experimenter bias on the performance of the albino rat
    Rosenthal, Robert, Fode, Kermit L. · 2007 · Behavioral Science
  9. The perpetuation of an arbitrary tradition through several generations of a laboratory microculture.
    Jacobs, Robert C., Campbell, Donald T. · 1961 · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
  10. Formal assessment of problem-solving and planning processes in preschool children
    Klahr, David, Robinson, Mitchell · 1981 · Cognitive Psychology

Show all 13 references

Cited by (9)

  1. A Meta-Analysis of Personality in Scientific and Artistic Creativity
    Feist, Gregory J. · 1998 · Personality and Social Psychology Review
  2. Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships
    Mumford, Michael D, Scott, Ginamarie M, Gaddis, Blaine, Strange, Jill M · 2002 · The Leadership Quarterly
  3. The Effectiveness of Creativity Training: A Quantitative Review
    Scott, Ginamarie, Leritz, Lyle E., Mumford, Michael D. · 2004 · Creativity Research Journal
  4. Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, person, and process perspectives.
    Simonton, Dean Keith · 2003 · Psychological Bulletin
  5. A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge
    Dienes, Zoltan, Perner, Josef · 1999 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences

See all 191

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The psychology of science: Review and integration of a nascent discipline. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//1089-2680.2.1.3
The paper
Feist, G. J., & Gorman, M. E. (1998). The psychology of science: Review and integration of a nascent discipline. Review of General Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//1089-2680.2.1.3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.