Cited by 672Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceEpistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsMemory Processes and Influences

A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge

Open access
Dienes, Zoltan, Perner, Josef·1999·Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Abstract

The implicit-explicit distinction is applied to knowledge representations. Knowledge is taken to be an attitude towards a proposition which is true. The proposition itself predicates a property to some entity. A number of ways in which knowledge can be implicit or explicit emerge. If a higher aspect is known explicitly then each lower one must also be known explicitly. This partial hierarchy reduces the number of ways in which knowledge can be explicit. In the most important type of implicit knowledge, representations merely reflect the property of objects or events without predicating them of any particular entity. The clearest cases of explicit knowledge of a fact are representations of one's own attitude of knowing that fact. These distinctions are discussed in their relationship to similar distinctions such as procedural-declarative, conscious-unconscious, verbalizable-nonverbalizable, direct-indirect tests, and automatic-voluntary control. This is followed by an outline of how these distinctions can be used to integrate and relate the often divergent uses of the implicit-explicit distinction in different research areas. We illustrate this for visual perception, memory, cognitive development, and artificial grammar learning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0140525x99002186

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dienes, Z., & Perner, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Sussex (GB)
  • University of Salzburg (AT)
Venue
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Published
1999-10
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
735-808
ISSN
  • 0140-525X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1825
OpenAlex
W2001098248
Cited by
672
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 34
FWCI
20.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioral and Brain Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
tacit knowledge, explicit knowledge, knowledge representation, knowledge hierarchies, visual perception, memory, cognitive development, artificial grammar learning
MeSH terms
Cognition, Humans, Learning, Linguistics, Memory, Psychological Theory, Visual Perception, Knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review