Work groups: From the Hawthorne studies to work teams of the 1990s and beyond.

Eric D. Sundstrom, Michael Louis McIntyre, Terry R. Halfhill, Heather Richards·2000·Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice
DOI 10.1037//1089-2699.4.1.44

Cites (8)

  1. Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams
    Edmondson, Amy · 1999 · Administrative Science Quarterly
  2. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias
    James, Lawrence R., Demaree, Robert G., Wolf, Gerrit · 1984 · Journal of Applied Psychology
  3. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict
    Jehn, Karen A. · 1995 · Administrative Science Quarterly
  4. What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite
    Cohen, Susan G., Bailey, Diane E. · 1997 · Journal of Management
  5. Some Social and Psychological Consequences of the Longwall Method of Coal-Getting: An Examination of the Psychological Situation and Defences of a Work Group in Relation to the Social Structure and Technological Content of the Work System
    Trist, E. L., Bamforth, K. W. · 1951 · Human Relations
  6. Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance
    Pelled, Lisa Hope, Eisenhardt, Kathleen M., Xin, Katherine R. · 1999 · Administrative Science Quarterly
  7. Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams
    Barker, James R. · 1993 · Administrative Science Quarterly
  8. The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration.
    Mullen, Brian, Copper, Carolyn · 1994 · Psychological Bulletin

Show all 8 references

Cited by (10)

  1. Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams
    Kozlowski, Steve W.J., Ilgen, Daniel R. · 2006 · Psychological Science in the Public Interest
  2. What Do We Know about Health Care Team Effectiveness? A Review of the Literature
    Lemieux-Charles, Louise, McGuire, Wendy L. · 2006 · Medical Care Research and Review
  3. A century of work teams in the Journal of Applied Psychology.
    Mathieu, John E., Hollenbeck, John R., van Knippenberg, Daan, Ilgen, Daniel R. · 2017 · Journal of Applied Psychology
  4. Does Team Communication Represent A One-Size-Fits-All Approach?: A Meta-Analysis Of Team Communication And Performance
    Marlow, Shannon L., Lacerenza, Christina N., Paoletti, Jensine, Burke, C. Shawn, Salas, Eduardo · 2018 · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
  5. Cohesion and Performance: A Meta-Analytic Review of Disparities Between Project Teams, Production Teams, and Service Teams
    Chiocchio, François, Essiembre, Hélène · 2009 · Small Group Research

See all 342

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Work groups: From the Hawthorne studies to work teams of the 1990s and beyond. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//1089-2699.4.1.44
The paper
Sundstrom, E. D., McIntyre, M. L., Halfhill, T. R., & Richards, H. (2000). Work groups: From the Hawthorne studies to work teams of the 1990s and beyond. Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1037//1089-2699.4.1.44

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.