The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychological status of the script concept.
Abstract
Suggests that there has been growing interest within several subfields of psychology in the schematic nature of mental representations of real-world objects and events. One simple form of schema is the “script,” embodying knowledge of stereotyped event sequences. The present author traces applicatio
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Moreover, students' claim to have successfully used the skill in other similar situations to guess the meaning of unfamiliar vocabulary could also be attributed to learning since similar situations activate scripts-concepts learned and rehearsed through an understanding of goals, causation, and plans of action (Abelson, 1981;Schank & Abelson, 1977).”
From Readers, Players, and Watchers: EFL Students’ Vocabulary Acquisition through Digital Video Games (2017) · cites this paper as Abelson, 1981
Citations
Cites
Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888 · Cited by 7,611
Bem, D. J. (1972) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60024-6 · Cited by 5,241
LaPiere, R. T. (1934) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2570339 · Cited by 1,720
Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique.
Freedman, J. L., & Fraser, S. C. (1966) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0023552 · Cited by 1,637
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science
Clark, A. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12000477 · Cited by 5,924
Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135231 · Cited by 3,915
Ouellette, J. A., & Wood, W. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.1.54 · Cited by 3,480
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.110.3.403 · Cited by 3,006
Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content.
Austin, J. T., & Vancouver, J. B. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.120.3.338 · Cited by 2,319
Metadata
- Authors
- Abelson, R. P.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Abelson, Robert P.
- Venue
- American Psychologist
- Published
- 1981-07
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 715-729
- ISSN
- 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-990X
- OpenAlex
- W2051017435
- Cited by
- 1,743
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 92 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 49
- FWCI
- 51.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cognitive and psychological constructs research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- scripts, schemas, mental representation, event knowledge, cognitive psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review