Cited by 412Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesCognitive Abilities and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adolescents' Performance on the Iowa Gambling Task: Implications for the Development of Decision Making and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex.

Abstract

Healthy adolescents (79 girls, 66 boys), ages 9-17, completed the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT; A. Bechara, A. R. Damasio, H. Damasio, & S. W. Anderson, 1994) as well as working memory (digit span) and behavioral inhibition (go/no-go) tasks. Cross-sectional age-related changes were seen on all 3 tasks. Gender differences were seen in IGT deck preference and attentional variables (i.e., go/no-go hit rate and forward digit span). After age, gender, and general intellectual abilities were controlled for, IGT performance was not predicted by working memory or behavioral inhibition scores. Findings suggest that the ventromedial prefrontal cortex or its connections are functionally maturing during adolescence in a manner that can be distinguished from maturation of other prefrontal regions. Development of these functions may continue into young adulthood.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0012-1649.40.6.1148

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 70 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Luciana, 2003, The neural and functional development of human prefrontal cortex., 157

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 409

Metadata

Authors
Hooper, C. J., Luciana, M., Conklin, H. M., & Yarger, R. S.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
2004
Volume
40
Issue
6
Pages
1148-1158
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2105218783
Cited by
412
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 20
FWCI
7.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
Iowa Gambling Task, decision-making, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, adolescent brain development, working memory, behavioral inhibition, gender differences, age-related changes, emotional decision-making, prefrontal cortex maturation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Child, Child Development, Cross-Sectional Studies, Decision Making, Female, Gambling, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Memory, Psychometrics, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review