CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 24Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFace Recognition and PerceptionChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differential influence of safe versus threatening facial expressions on decision‐making during an inhibitory control task in adolescence and adulthood

Open access
Cohen‐Gilbert, J.E., Killgore, W.D.S., White, C.N., Schwab, Z.J., Crowley, D.J., Covell, M.J., Sneider, J.T., Silveri, M.M.·2014·Developmental Science
DOI 10.1111/desc.12123PMC PMC4465543
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Social cognition matures dramatically during adolescence and into early adulthood, supported by continued improvements in inhibitory control. During this time, developmental changes in interpreting and responding to social signals such as facial expressions also occur. In the present study, subjects performed a Go No‐Go task that required them to respond or inhibit responding based on threat or safety cues present in facial expressions. Subjects (N = 112) were divided into three age groups: adolescent (12–15 years), emerging adult (18–25 years) and adult (26–44 years). Analyses revealed a significant improvement in accuracy on No‐Go trials, but not Go trials, during both safe and threat face conditions, with changes evident through early adulthood. In order to better identify the decision‐making processes responsible for these changes in inhibitory control, a drift diffusion model (DDM) was fit to the accuracy and reaction time data, generating measures of caution, response bias, nondecision time (encoding + motor response), and drift rate (face processing efficiency). Caution and nondecision time both increased significantly with age while bias towards the Go response decreased. Drift rate analyses revealed significant age‐related improvements in the ability to map threat faces to a No‐Go response while drift rates on all other trial types were equivalent across age groups. These results suggest that both stimulus‐independent and stimulus‐dependent processes contribute to improvements in inhibitory control in adolescence with processing of negative social cues being specifically impaired by self‐regulatory demands. Findings from this novel investigation of emotional responsiveness integrated with inhibitory control may provide useful insights about healthy development that can be applied to better understand adolescent risk‐taking behavior and the elevated incidence of related forms of psychopathology during this period of life.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/desc.12123

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior research examining motivational and social influences on cognitive capacities in young adults as a unique age group has produced mixed results.

    “Prior research examining motivational and social influences on cognitive capacities in young adults as a unique age group has produced mixed results (Chein et al., 2011; Cohen-Gilbert et al., 2014; Silva et al., 2015; Steinberg et al., 2009).”

    From When Is an Adolescent an Adult? Assessing Cognitive Control in Emotional and Nonemotional Contexts (2016) · cites this paper as Cohen-Gilbert et al., 2014

  • Prior research examining motivational and social influences on cognitive capacities in young adults has used varying age ranges and experimental manipulations that have produced mixed results.

    “Prior research examining motivational and social influences on cognitive capacities in young adults has used varying age ranges and experimental manipulations that have produced mixed results (Chein et  al., 2011; Cohen-Gilbert et al., 2014; Silva, Shulman, Chein, & Steinberg, 2015; Steinberg et al., 2009).”

    From When Is an Adolescent an Adult? Assessing Cognitive Control in Emotional and Nonemotional Contexts (2016) · cites this paper as Cohen-Gilbert et al., 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. 10.1037/0003‐066X.54.5.317 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1037/0003‐066X.55.5.469 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/S0301‐0511(00)00058‐2 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1111/cdev.12085 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1002/cne.10376 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1038/13158 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1037/0096‐3445.136.3.389 · DOI
  8. 10.1162/jocn.2008.20114 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.03.015 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1027/0269‐8803.19.1.11 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.04.064 · DOI
  12. 10.1097/00001756‐200102120‐00047 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1097/00001756‐200108080‐00050 · DOI
  14. 10.2466/PMS.99.5.371‐391 · DOI
  15. 10.1097/01.wnr.0000198951.30939.73 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1469‐7610.2006.01640.x · DOI
  17. 10.1097/01.yco.0000191500.46411.00 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.3.430 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1111/j.1467‐8624.2004.00745.x · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.08.005 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/S0278‐2626(02)00012‐X · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1016/S1053‐8119(03)00355‐0 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.010 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1073/pnas.0805664105 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Parker J., 2006, Developmental psychopathology: Theory and method, 419
  26. 10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.008 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.09.008 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1037/0033‐295X.85.2.59 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1111/j.1467‐8624.2011.01683.x · DOI
  30. 10.1037/0033‐295X.111.2.333 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/j.1530‐0277.2010.01337.x · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.01.33 · DOI
  33. 10.1162/jocn.2010.21572 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1038/13154 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/S0149-7634(00)00014-2 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195306255.003.0001 · DOI
  37. 10.3758/s13423‐011‐0189‐3 · DOI
  38. 10.1111/j.1467‐7687.2007.00614.x · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00039 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1176/appi.ajp.164.4.638 · DOI
  41. 10.1037/a0019474 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.jmp.2010.01.004 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.07.046 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cohen‐Gilbert, J. E., Killgore, W. D. S., White, C. N., Schwab, Z. J., Crowley, D. J., Covell, M. J., Sneider, J. T., & Silveri, M. M.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Syracuse University (US)
  • McLean Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Cohen‐Gilbert, J.E.
ORCID
Venue
Developmental Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-01-04
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
212-223
ISSN
  • 1363-755X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-7687
DOI
10.1111/desc.12123
PMC
PMC4465543
OpenAlex
W2070850968
Cited by
24
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Developmental Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • McLean Hospital
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA018153, K01AA014651)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
inhibitory control, facial expressions, social cognition development, adolescence, emerging adulthood, drift-diffusion model, decision-making, response bias, non-decision time, drift rate, emotional responsiveness, self-regulation, risk-taking
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aging, Cognition, Decision Making, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Reaction Time, Regression Analysis, Time Factors, Caregivers, Prefrontal Cortex, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review