Cited by 157Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPsychological Testing and Assessment

Interpretation revealed in the blink of an eye: depressive bias in the resolution of ambiguity

Lawson, Clair, MacLeod, Colin, Hammond, Geoff·2002·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

Self-report measures of interpretation have been criticized on methodological grounds. An approach is introduced in this article that enables the assessment of interpretive bias with a greater degree of methodological rigor than previously has been the case. Psychophysiological researchers have established that the magnitude of the human blink reflex is augmented when elicited during negative rather than neutral imagery. The 1st experiment demonstrates that the blink reflex is sensitive to the emotional valence of imagery evoked by interpretations imposed on ambiguous stimuli. In the 2nd experiment, this measure is used to assess interpretations imposed on ambiguous stimuli by individuals who differ in depression levels. The findings are consistent with the hypothesis that depression is associated with a negative interpretive bias.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-843x.111.2.321

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lawson, C., MacLeod, C., & Hammond, G.
Affiliations
The University of Western Australia (AU)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2002-05
Volume
111
Issue
2
Pages
321-328
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2067592459
Cited by
157
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
interpretation bias, depression, ambiguity resolution, blink reflex, ambiguous stimuli
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Concept Formation, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Paired-Associate Learning, Semantics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review